UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-24843
AMERICA FIRST TAX EXEMPT INVESTORS, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
47-0810385
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1004 Farnam Street, Suite 400 Omaha, Nebraska
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
68102
(Zip Code) |
(402) 444-1630
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non- accelerated filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
YES o NO þ
INDEX
Forward-Looking Statements
This report (including, but not limited to, the information contained in Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations) contains forward-looking statements
that reflect managements current beliefs and estimates of future economic circumstances, industry
conditions, the Companys performance and financial results. All statements, trend analysis and
other information concerning possible or assumed future results of operations of the Company and
the investments it has made constitute forward-looking statements. Beneficial Unit Certificate
(BUC) holders and others should understand that these forward-looking statements are subject to
numerous risks and uncertainties and a number of factors could affect the future results of the
Company and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the
forward-looking statements contained herein. These factors include general economic and business
conditions such as the availability and credit worthiness of prospective tenants, lease rents,
operating expenses, the terms and availability of financing for properties financed by the
tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds owned by the Partnership, adverse changes in the real estate
markets from governmental or legislative forces, lack of availability and credit worthiness of
counterparties to finance future acquisitions and interest rate fluctuations and other items
discussed under Risk Factors in Item 1A of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 and in Item 1A of Part II of this report.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
AMERICA FIRST TAX EXEMPT INVESTORS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
10,500,019 |
|
|
$ |
8,476,928 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
3,231,447 |
|
|
|
2,131,272 |
|
Interest receivable |
|
|
445,628 |
|
|
|
264,160 |
|
Tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds |
|
|
58,177,478 |
|
|
|
27,103,398 |
|
Other tax-exempt bond |
|
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,800,000 |
|
Real estate assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
10,357,004 |
|
|
|
7,280,555 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
98,594,668 |
|
|
|
77,311,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate assets before accumulated depreciation |
|
|
108,951,672 |
|
|
|
84,591,861 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(29,432,628 |
) |
|
|
(28,381,932 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net real estate assets |
|
|
79,519,044 |
|
|
|
56,209,929 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
3,775,122 |
|
|
|
1,214,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
160,648,738 |
|
|
$ |
100,200,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Partners Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
$ |
7,101,493 |
|
|
$ |
6,117,451 |
|
Distribution payable |
|
|
1,844,731 |
|
|
|
1,566,378 |
|
Mortgage payable |
|
|
19,920,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Debt financing |
|
|
58,940,000 |
|
|
|
45,770,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
87,806,224 |
|
|
|
53,453,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and Contingencies (Note 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority Interest |
|
|
61,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners Capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Partner |
|
|
1,578,339 |
|
|
|
1,526,062 |
|
Beneficial Unit Certificate (BUC) holders |
|
|
117,895,642 |
|
|
|
90,722,467 |
|
Unallocated deficit of variable interest entities |
|
|
(46,693,253 |
) |
|
|
(45,502,169 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Partners Capital |
|
|
72,780,728 |
|
|
|
46,746,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Partners Capital |
|
$ |
160,648,738 |
|
|
$ |
100,200,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
AMERICA FIRST TAX EXEMPT INVESTORS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended, |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended, |
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property revenues |
|
$ |
3,508,156 |
|
|
$ |
3,457,715 |
|
|
$ |
7,084,406 |
|
|
$ |
6,858,152 |
|
Mortgage revenue bond investment income |
|
|
631,855 |
|
|
|
361,318 |
|
|
|
1,054,293 |
|
|
|
626,368 |
|
Other interest income |
|
|
309,101 |
|
|
|
85,456 |
|
|
|
517,875 |
|
|
|
217,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,449,112 |
|
|
|
3,904,489 |
|
|
|
8,656,574 |
|
|
|
7,701,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate operating (exclusive of items
shown below) |
|
|
2,189,457 |
|
|
|
2,197,937 |
|
|
|
4,150,972 |
|
|
|
4,322,135 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
569,503 |
|
|
|
565,654 |
|
|
|
1,056,883 |
|
|
|
1,178,906 |
|
Interest |
|
|
526,099 |
|
|
|
396,461 |
|
|
|
1,054,897 |
|
|
|
780,942 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
402,115 |
|
|
|
311,342 |
|
|
|
693,107 |
|
|
|
719,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,687,174 |
|
|
|
3,471,394 |
|
|
|
6,955,859 |
|
|
|
7,001,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
761,938 |
|
|
|
433,095 |
|
|
|
1,700,715 |
|
|
|
700,175 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
761,938 |
|
|
$ |
644,834 |
|
|
$ |
1,700,715 |
|
|
$ |
1,105,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income allocated to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Partner |
|
$ |
71,945 |
|
|
$ |
12,914 |
|
|
$ |
84,435 |
|
|
$ |
24,214 |
|
BUC holders |
|
|
1,570,876 |
|
|
|
1,278,475 |
|
|
|
2,807,364 |
|
|
|
2,397,222 |
|
Unallocated loss of variable interest entities |
|
|
(880,883 |
) |
|
|
(646,555 |
) |
|
|
(1,191,084 |
) |
|
|
(1,316,067 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
761,938 |
|
|
$ |
644,834 |
|
|
$ |
1,700,715 |
|
|
$ |
1,105,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUC holders interest in net income per unit
(basic and diluted): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, basic and diluted, per unit |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of units
outstanding, basic and diluted |
|
|
13,050,565 |
|
|
|
9,837,928 |
|
|
|
11,453,121 |
|
|
|
9,837,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
AMERICA FIRST TAX EXEMPT INVESTORS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS CAPITAL AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial Unit |
|
|
deficit of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
General |
|
|
Certificate holders |
|
|
variable interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Partner |
|
|
# of Units |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
entities |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Loss |
|
Balance at January 1, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,526,062 |
|
|
|
9,837,928 |
|
|
$ |
90,722,467 |
|
|
$ |
(45,502,169 |
) |
|
$ |
46,746,360 |
|
|
$ |
(722,435 |
) |
Sale of Beneficial Unit Certificates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,675,000 |
|
|
|
27,549,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,549,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
84,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,807,364 |
|
|
|
(1,191,084 |
) |
|
|
1,700,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on securities |
|
|
(499 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,920 |
) |
|
|
(49,920 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,650,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions paid or accrued |
|
|
(31,659 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,134,124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,165,783 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,578,339 |
|
|
|
13,512,928 |
|
|
$ |
117,895,642 |
|
|
$ |
(46,693,253 |
) |
|
$ |
72,780,728 |
|
|
$ |
(772,355 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
AMERICA FIRST TAX EXEMPT INVESTORS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
June
30, 2006 |
|
Operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,700,715 |
|
|
$ |
1,105,369 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,056,883 |
|
|
|
1,313,743 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect from acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) in interest receivable |
|
|
(181,468 |
) |
|
|
(49,634 |
) |
(Increase) in other assets |
|
|
(303,747 |
) |
|
|
(58,545 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(684,316 |
) |
|
|
864,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
1,588,067 |
|
|
|
3,175,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of tax-exempt revenue bonds |
|
|
(55,149,000 |
) |
|
|
(18,800,000 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of other tax-exempt bonds |
|
|
23,800,000 |
|
|
|
19,200,000 |
|
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
(1,100,175 |
) |
|
|
(107,351 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(305,475 |
) |
|
|
(38,639 |
) |
Acquisition of partnerships |
|
|
(9,220,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Principal payments received on tax-exempt revenue bonds |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
(41,950,040 |
) |
|
|
274,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions paid |
|
|
(2,887,430 |
) |
|
|
(2,683,069 |
) |
Proceeds from mortgage payable |
|
|
19,920,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Debt financing costs paid |
|
|
(1,271,266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayment of liabilities assumed |
|
|
(15,112,771 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from debt financing |
|
|
13,300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on debt financing and note payable |
|
|
(130,000 |
) |
|
|
(215,000 |
) |
Acquisition of interest rate cap agreements |
|
|
(83,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increase in deposits and escrowed funds |
|
|
1,100,175 |
|
|
|
107,351 |
|
Sale of additional Beneficial Unit Certificates |
|
|
27,549,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
42,385,064 |
|
|
|
(2,790,718 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
2,023,091 |
|
|
|
659,173 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
8,476,928 |
|
|
|
3,298,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
10,500,019 |
|
|
$ |
3,957,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest |
|
$ |
1,066,431 |
|
|
$ |
1,457,341 |
|
Distributions declared but not paid |
|
$ |
1,824,245 |
|
|
$ |
1,341,535 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing and investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed in the acquisition of partnerships |
|
$ |
15,742,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
4
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2007
(UNAUDITED)
1. Basis of Presentation
America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P. (the Partnership) was formed on April 2, 1998 under the
Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act for the purpose of acquiring, holding, selling and
otherwise dealing with a portfolio of federally tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds which have been
issued to provide construction and/or permanent financing of multifamily residential apartments.
The Partnership will terminate on December 31, 2050 unless terminated earlier under the provisions
of its Agreement of Limited Partnership. The general partner of the Partnership is America First
Capital Associates Limited Partnership Two (the General Partner or AFCA 2).
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Partnership, its wholly-owned
subsidiary, and of the variable interest entities (VIEs) of which the Partnership has been
determined to be the primary beneficiary. In this Form 10-Q, the Partnership refers to America
First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P. and its subsidiary as a consolidated entity and the Company
refers to the Partnership and the VIEs on a consolidated basis. In the Company consolidated
financial statements, all transactions and accounts between the Partnership and the VIEs have been
eliminated in consolidation. The Partnership does not presently believe that the consolidation of
VIEs for reporting under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(GAAP) will impact the Partnerships tax status, amounts reported to Beneficial Unit Certificate
(BUC) holders on IRS Form K-1, the Partnerships ability to distribute tax-exempt income to BUC
holders, the current level of quarterly distributions or the tax-exempt status of the underlying
mortgage revenue bonds.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates. The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
have been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted according to such rules and
regulations, although management believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information
presented not misleading. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. In the opinion of management, all normal and
recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position as of June 30, 2007, and
the results of operations for all periods presented have been made. The results of operations for
the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
2. Partnership Income, Expenses and Cash Distributions
The Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Partnership contains provisions for the distribution of
Net Interest Income, Net Residual Proceeds and Liquidation Proceeds, for the allocation of income
or loss from operations and for the allocation of income and loss arising from a repayment, sale or
liquidation of investments. Income and losses will be allocated to each BUC holder on a periodic
basis, as determined by the General Partner, based on the number of BUCs held by each BUC holder as
of the last day of the period for which such allocation is to be made. Distributions of Net
Interest Income and Net Residual Proceeds will be made to each BUC holder of record on the last day
of each distribution period based on the number of BUCs held by each BUC holder as of such date.
For purposes of the Agreement of Limited Partnership, cash distributions, if any, received by the
Partnership from the Investment in Multifamily Apartment Properties (see Note 4, below) will
5
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2007
(UNAUDITED)
be included in the Partnerships Interest Income and cash distributions received by the Partnership
from the sale of such properties will be included in the Partnerships Residual Proceeds.
The unallocated deficit of the VIEs is primarily comprised of the accumulated historical net losses
of the VIEs as of January 1, 2004 and the VIEs net losses since the adoption of FIN 46R
Accounting for Variable Interest Entities as of January 1, 2004. Such losses are not allocated
to the General Partner and BUC holders as such activity is not contemplated by, or addressed in,
the Agreement of Limited Partnership.
Cash distributions are currently made on a quarterly basis but may be made on a monthly or
semiannual basis at the election of AFCA 2.
3. Investments in Tax-Exempt Bonds
The Company had the following investments in tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds as of the dates
shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gain |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Description of Tax-Exempt Mortgage Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chandler Creek Apartments |
|
$ |
11,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(16,100 |
) |
|
$ |
11,483,900 |
|
Clarkson College |
|
|
6,110,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(630,665 |
) |
|
|
5,480,168 |
|
Bella Vista |
|
|
6,800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(147,560 |
) |
|
|
6,652,440 |
|
Deerfield Apartments |
|
|
3,390,000 |
|
|
|
21,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,411,970 |
|
Woodland Park |
|
|
15,715,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,715,000 |
|
Prairiebrook Village |
|
|
5,862,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,862,000 |
|
Gardens of DeCordova |
|
|
4,870,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,870,000 |
|
Gardens of Weatherford |
|
|
4,702,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,702,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
58,949,833 |
|
|
$ |
21,970 |
|
|
$ |
(794,325 |
) |
|
$ |
58,177,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gain |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Description of Tax-Exempt Mortgage Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chandler Creek Apartments |
|
$ |
11,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(81,650 |
) |
|
$ |
11,418,350 |
|
Clarkson College |
|
|
6,135,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(640,785 |
) |
|
|
5,495,048 |
|
Bella Vista |
|
|
6,800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,800,000 |
|
Deerfield Apartments |
|
|
3,390,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,390,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27,825,833 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(722,435 |
) |
|
$ |
27,103,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains or losses on these tax-exempt bonds are recorded to reflect quarterly changes
in their estimated fair values resulting from market conditions and fluctuations in the present
value of the expected cash flows from the underlying properties. The current unrealized losses on
the bonds are not considered to be other-than-temporary because the Company has the intent and
ability to hold these securities until their value recovers or until maturity, if necessary. The
unrealized gain or loss will continue to fluctuate each reporting period based on the market
conditions and present value of the expected cash flow.
The Chandler Creek bonds are in technical default and interest is being paid on these bonds at a
rate below the stated rate. In April 2006, the Company terminated a forbearance agreement with the
borrower. The termination of the forbearance agreement allows the Company to seek additional
remedies including foreclosure
6
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2007
(UNAUDITED)
of the property, if necessary. The Company does not currently
intend to exercise its right to foreclose on the property as the property continues to pursue
alternatives to ultimately satisfy its obligations to its creditors.
In May 2007, the Company acquired the Woodland Park bonds at par value of $15.1 million series A
and $0.6 million series B, which together represented 100% of the bond issuance. The bonds earn
interest at an annual rate of 6.0% for Series A and 8.0% for Series B with semi-annual interest
payments and a stated maturity date of November 1, 2047. The bonds were issued in order to
construct a 236 unit multifamily apartment complex in Topeka, Kansas. The apartment complex is
currently under construction with an estimated completion date of January 2009. The Company has
determined that the underlying entity that supports the bonds does not meet the definition of a VIE
and will not be required to be consolidated into the Companys consolidated financial statements
under FIN 46R.
In May 2007, the Company acquired the Gardens of DeCordova bonds at par value of $4.9 million,
which represented 100% of the bond issuance. The bonds earn interest at an annual rate of 6.0%
with semi-annual interest payments and a stated maturity date of May 1, 2047. The bonds were
issued in order to construct a 76 unit multifamily apartment complex in Granbury, Texas. The
apartment complex is currently under construction with an estimated completion date of August 2008.
The Company has determined that the underlying entity that supports the bonds does not meet the
definition of a VIE and will not be required to be consolidated into the Companys consolidated
financial statements under FIN 46R.
In May 2007, the Company acquired the Gardens of Weatherford bonds at par value of $4.7 million,
which represented 100% of the bond issuance. The bonds earn interest at an annual rate of 6.0%
with semi-annual interest payments and a stated maturity date of May 1, 2047. The bonds were
issued in order to construct a 76 unit multifamily apartment complex in Weatherford, Texas. The
apartment complex is currently under construction with an estimated completion date of August 2008.
The Company has determined that the underlying entity that supports the bonds does not meet the
definition of a VIE and will not be required to be consolidated into the Companys consolidated
financial statements under FIN 46R.
In June 2007, the Company acquired the Prairiebrook Village bonds at par value of $5.5 million
series A and $0.4 million series B, which together represented 100% of the bond issuance. The
bonds earn interest at an annual rate of 6.0% for the series A and 8.0% for the series B with
semi-annual interest payments and a stated maturity date of June 1, 2047. The bonds were issued in
order to construct a 72 unit multifamily apartment complex in Gardner, Kansas. The apartment
complex is currently under construction with an estimated completion date of September 2008. The
Company has determined that the underlying entity that supports the bonds does not meet the
definition of a VIE and will not be required to be consolidated into the Companys consolidated
financial statements under FIN 46R.
4. Investment in Multifamily Apartment Properties
To facilitate its investment strategy of acquiring additional tax-exempt mortgage bonds secured by
multifamily apartment properties (MF Properties), the Partnership may acquire ownership positions
in apartment properties. The Partnership expects to ultimately restructure the property ownership
through a sale of the MF Properties and a syndication of low income housing tax credits (LIHTCs).
The Partnership expects to provide the tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds to the new property
owners as part of the restructuring. Such restructurings will generally be expected to be
initiated within 36 months of the initial investment in MF Properties and will often coincide with
the expiration of the compliance period relating to LIHTCs previously
7
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2007
(UNAUDITED)
issued with respect to the MF
Property. The Partnership will not acquire LIHTCs in connection with these transactions.
On June 29, 2007, America First LP Holding Corp. (Holding Corp.), a wholly-owned subsidiary of
the Partnership, acquired 99% limited partner interests in six Ohio limited partnerships (the
Property Partnerships) for a cash purchase price of approximately $9.2 million plus assumed debt
and other liabilities of approximately $15.7 million. Each Property Partnership owns a multifamily
apartment property, of which four are located in Ohio and two are located in Kentucky. The cash
portion of the purchase price was funded by cash on hand. In connection with the acquisition, the
Property Partnerships refinanced their existing debt with an aggregate loan of approximately $19.9
million from JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. The interest rate on this mortgage is variable and is
calculated as LIBOR plus 1.55%. As of the transaction date, LIBOR was 5.32% and the interest on
the mortgage was 6.87%. The mortgage matures in July 2009. The Company has guaranteed the payment
of certain exceptions from the nonrecourse provisions and certain environmental obligations, should
they arise, in connection the JP Morgan loan. The 1% general partner interests in the six Property
Partnerships were acquired by Atlantic Development GP Holding Corp., a party unaffiliated with the
Partnership, with the proceeds of an approximately $62,000 loan from
Holding Corp. This 1% ownership interest is reflected in the
consolidated financial statements as minority interest.
SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, requires that the total purchase price be allocated to the
Property Partnerships net tangible and identified intangible assets acquired and liabilities
assumed based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. While the assets and
liabilities of the Property Partnerships are included in the Companys consolidated balance sheet
at June 30, 2007, there were no results of operations from the Property Partnership recorded in the
Companys consolidated statement of operations for the three and six periods ended on that date due
to the fact that the interest in the Property Partnerships was acquired on the last business day of
the period. The table below shows the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated results of
operations of the Company as if the Property Partnerships had been acquired at the beginning of
the period presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
Ended, |
|
Ended, |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
June 30, 2006 |
Revenues |
|
$ |
10,768,209 |
|
|
$ |
9,657,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
1,002,696 |
|
|
|
229,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
allocated to BUC holders |
|
|
2,109,345 |
|
|
|
1,521,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUC holders interest in net income per unit (basic and diluted): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, basic and diluted, per unit |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
The pro forma financial information represents the historical operating results of the
combined company with adjustments for purchase accounting and is not necessarily indicative of the
results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition had taken place at the
beginning of the period presented.
8
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2007
(UNAUDITED)
The Company had the following investments in MF Properties as of June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Value at |
|
Property Name |
|
Location |
|
of Units |
|
|
Land |
|
|
Improvements |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
Eagle Ridge |
|
Erlanger, KY |
|
|
64 |
|
|
$ |
290,763 |
|
|
$ |
2,362,445 |
|
|
$ |
2,653,208 |
|
Meadowview |
|
Highland Heights, KY |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
703,936 |
|
|
|
4,837,044 |
|
|
|
5,540,980 |
|
Crescent Village |
|
Cincinnati, OH |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
353,117 |
|
|
|
4,274,568 |
|
|
|
4,627,685 |
|
Willow Bend |
|
Hilliard, OH |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
580,130 |
|
|
|
2,975,236 |
|
|
|
3,555,366 |
|
Postwoods I |
|
Reynoldsburg, OH |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
572,066 |
|
|
|
3,221,174 |
|
|
|
3,793,240 |
|
Postwoods II |
|
Reynoldsburg, OH |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
576,438 |
|
|
|
3,245,788 |
|
|
|
3,822,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,992,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,992,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
purchase price allocation is preliminary pending the finalization of
the purchase accounting.
5. Debt Financing
The Companys long-term debt is provided by securitization transactions through the Merrill Lynch
P-Float program which are accounted for as secured borrowings and, in effect, provide variable-rate
financing for the acquisition of new, or the securitization of existing, tax-exempt mortgage
revenue bonds. The Companys debt financing of $58.9 million bears interest at a weekly floating
bond rate, including associated remarketing, credit enhancement, liquidity and trustee fees, that
averaged 4.4% per annum and 3.9% per annum during the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively and 4.5% per annum and 3.9% per annum during the three months ended June 30, 2007 and
2006 respectively. Maturity dates for the Companys debt financing range from 2008 through 2038.
6. Issuance of Additional Beneficial Unit Certificates
In April 2007, the Company issued, through an underwritten public offering, a total of 3,675,000
BUCs at a public offering price of $8.06 per BUC. Net proceeds realized by the Company from the
issuance of the additional BUCs were approximately $27.5 million, after payment of an underwriters
discount and other offering costs of approximately $2.1 million. The proceeds were used to acquire
additional tax-exempt revenue bonds and other investments meeting the Partnerships investment
criteria as described in Notes 3 and 4, and for general working capital needs. The offering was
made pursuant to a shelf registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
7. Related Party Transactions
The General Partner is entitled to receive an administrative fee from the Company of up to 0.45% of
the outstanding principal balance of any tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond or other mortgage
investment, unless another third party is required to pay such administrative fee. For the three
and six months ended June 30, 2007, the Companys administrative fees to the General Partner were
$103,000 and $223,000 respectively. For
9
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2007
(UNAUDITED)
the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, the Companys administrative fees to the General
Partner were $118,000 and $196,000, respectively.
An affiliate of the General Partner provides property management services for many of the apartment
communities financed by the Partnerships tax exempt bonds. As of June 30, 2007, this affiliate
was providing property management services for Ashley Square, Ashley Pointe at Eagle Crest, Iona
Lakes Apartments, Bent Tree Apartments, Lake Forest Apartments, Clarkson College, Chandler Creek
Apartments, Deerfield Apartments, and Fairmont Oaks Apartments. The management fees paid by the
property owners to the affiliate of the General Partner amounted to $158,000 for the three months
ended June 30, 2007, and $197,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The management fees
paid by the property owners to the affiliate of the General Partner amounted to $277,000 for the
six months ended June 30, 2007, and $363,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006. These property
management fees are paid by the respective properties prior to the payment of any interest on the
tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds and taxable loans held by the Partnership on these properties.
The property management affiliate of the General Partner also assumed the management of the six MF
Properties described in Note 4 on June 29, 2007, and will receive property management fees from the
Property Partnerships described in Note 4 in connection therewith. No property management fees
were paid to the property management affiliate of the General Partner for the six MF Properties
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2007.
8. Interest Rate Cap Agreements
The Company has four interest rate cap agreements with a combined notional amount of $45.0 million
in order to mitigate its exposure to increases in interest rates on its variable-rate debt
financing. The Property Partnerships described in Note 4 also entered into an interest rate cap
with a notional amount of $19.9 million in conjunction with the variable rate mortgage loan
acquired by the Property Partnerships to finance the six MF Properties described in Note 4. The
terms of the cap agreements are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal of |
|
Effective |
|
Maturity |
|
Purchase |
|
|
Date Purchased |
|
Debt Financing |
|
Capped Rate |
|
Date |
|
Price |
|
Counter party |
July 7, 2006 |
|
$ |
10,000,000 |
|
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
July 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
159,700 |
|
|
US Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 1, 2002 |
|
$ |
10,000,000 |
|
|
|
3.75 |
% (1) |
|
November 1, 2007 |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
Bank of America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2003 |
|
$ |
15,000,000 |
|
|
|
4.25 |
% (2) |
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
608,000 |
|
|
Bank of America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2007 |
|
$ |
10,000,000 |
|
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
May 1, 2012 |
|
$ |
65,500 |
|
|
US Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2007 |
|
$ |
19,920,000 |
|
|
|
8.30 |
% |
|
July 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
17,500 |
|
|
JP Morgan |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The counterparty has the right to convert the cap into a fixed rate swap with an effective
fixed interest rate to the Partnership of 3.50%. |
|
(2) |
|
The counterparty has the right to convert the cap into a fixed rate swap with an effective
fixed interest rate to the Partnership of 3.85%. |
10
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2007
(UNAUDITED)
These interest rate caps do not qualify for hedge accounting; accordingly, they are carried at
fair value, with changes in fair value included in current period earnings within interest expense.
The change in the fair value of the interest rate caps resulted in a reduction of interest expense
of approximately $150,000 and $118,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007,
respectively, and in a reduction of interest expense of approximately $58,000 and $123,000 for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively.
9. Segment Reporting
For financial reporting purposes, effective June 29, 2007 with the acquisition of the MF Properties
described in Note 4, the Company now has three reportable segments: Tax-Exempt Bond Investments, MF
Properties, and the VIEs. In addition to the three reportable segments, the Company also
separately reports its consolidating and eliminating entries since it does not allocate certain
items to the segments.
Tax-Exempt Bond Investments
The Tax-Exempt Bond Investments segment consists of the Companys portfolio of federally tax-exempt
mortgage revenue bonds which have been issued to provide construction and/or permanent financing of
multifamily residential apartments that are not owned by VIEs. Such tax exempt bonds are held as
long-term investments. As of June 30, 2007, the Company held eight tax-exempt bonds not associated
with VIEs. The multifamily apartment properties financed by these tax exempt bonds contain a total
of 1,034 rental units.
MF Properties Segment
The MF Properties segment consists of indirect equity interests in multifamily apartment properties
which are not currently financed by tax-exempt bonds held by the Partnership but which the
Partnership eventually intends to finance by such bonds through a restructuring. In connection
with any such restructuring, the Partnership will be required to dispose of any equity interest
held in such MF Properties. The Partnerships interests in its current MF Properties are not
currently classified as Assets Held for Sale because the Partnership is not actively marketing
their sale, there is no definitive purchase agreement in existence, and no sale is expected in the
next twelve months. During the time the Partnership holds an interest in a MF Property, any net
rental income generated by the MF Properties in excess of debt service will be available for
distribution to the Partnership in accordance with its interest in the MF Property. Any such cash
distribution will contribute to the Partnerships Cash Available for Distribution (CAD). As of
June 30, 2007, the Company held interest in six MF Properties containing a total of 544 rental
units.
The VIE Segment
The VIE segment consists of multifamily apartment properties which are financed with tax-exempt
bonds held by the Partnership, the assets, liabilities and operating results of which are
consolidated with those of the Partnership as a result of its adoption of FIN 46R. The tax exempt
bonds on these VIE properties are eliminated from the Companys financial statements as a result of
such consolidation, however, such bonds are held as long-term investments by the Partnership which
continues to be entitled to receive principal and interest payments on such bonds. The Company
does not actually own an equity position in the VIEs or their underlying properties. As of June
30, 2007, the Company consolidated eight VIE multifamily apartment properties containing a total of
1,764 rental units.
11
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2007
(UNAUDITED)
Management closely monitors and evaluates the financial reporting associated with and the
operations of the VIEs and the MF Properties and performs such evaluation separately from the
operations of the Partnership through interaction with the property management company which
manages the multifamily apartment properties held by the VIEs and the MF Properties.
Managements goals with respect to the properties constituting each of the Companys operating
segments is to generate increasing amounts of net rental income from these properties that will
allow them to (i) make all
payments of base interest, and possibly pay contingent interest, on the properties included in the
Tax Exempt Bond Investments segment and the VIE segment, and (ii) distribute net rental income to
the Partnership from the MF Properties segment until such properties can be refinanced with
additional tax-exempt mortgage bonds meeting the Partnerships investment criteria. In order to
achieve these goal, management of these multifamily apartment properties is focused on: (i)
maintaining high economic occupancy and increasing rental rates through effective leasing, reduced
turnover rates and providing quality maintenance and services to maximize resident satisfaction;
(ii) managing operating expenses and achieving cost reductions through operating efficiencies and
economies of scale generally inherent in the management of a portfolio of multiple properties; and
(iii) emphasizing regular programs of repairs, maintenance and property improvements to enhance the
competitive advantage and value of its properties in their respective market areas.
The following table details certain key financial information for the Companys reportable segments
for the periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Exempt Bond Financing |
|
$ |
2,572,009 |
|
|
$ |
2,002,756 |
|
|
$ |
4,653,118 |
|
|
$ |
3,929,132 |
|
VIEs |
|
|
3,508,156 |
|
|
|
3,457,716 |
|
|
|
7,084,406 |
|
|
|
6,858,152 |
|
Consolidation/eliminations |
|
|
(1,631,053 |
) |
|
|
(1,555,983 |
) |
|
|
(3,080,950 |
) |
|
|
(3,085,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
4,449,112 |
|
|
$ |
3,904,489 |
|
|
$ |
8,656,574 |
|
|
$ |
7,701,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Exempt Bond Financing |
|
$ |
1,637,138 |
|
|
$ |
1,291,389 |
|
|
$ |
2,891,799 |
|
|
$ |
2,421,436 |
|
VIEs |
|
|
(1,456,747 |
) |
|
|
(1,420,806 |
) |
|
|
(2,503,573 |
) |
|
|
(2,862,105 |
) |
Consolidation/eliminations |
|
|
581,547 |
|
|
|
774,251 |
|
|
|
1,312,489 |
|
|
|
1,546,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
761,938 |
|
|
$ |
644,834 |
|
|
$ |
1,700,715 |
|
|
$ |
1,105,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Exempt Bond Financing |
|
$ |
174,856,174 |
|
|
$ |
133,887,842 |
|
MF Properties |
|
|
26,692,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
VIEs |
|
|
60,034,529 |
|
|
|
58,969,966 |
|
Consolidation/eliminations |
|
|
(100,934,449 |
) |
|
|
(92,657,619 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
160,648,738 |
|
|
$ |
100,200,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to the
date of the acquisition, no revenues or income are shown for the MF
Properties segment.
10. Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale
During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006, Northwoods Lake Apartments, a VIE, was
considered a discontinued operation and, accordingly, its results of operations for such periods
were reported as discontinued
12
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2007
(UNAUDITED)
operations and disclosed as a single line item on the Companys
consolidated statements of operations. The sale of Northwoods Lake Apartments was completed in
August of 2006. There were no assets or liabilities of discontinued operations included in the
balance sheet as of June 30, 2007 or December 31, 2006.
The following table presents the revenues and net income for the discontinued operations for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Rental Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,013,761 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,018,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
802,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,613,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
211,739 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
405,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. The interpretation clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in tax positions. The interpretation, effective for the Company beginning in the first
quarter of 2007, did not have a material effect on the Partnerships financial statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, Fair Value
Measurement (SFAS No. 157). This statement does
not require new fair value measurements, however, it provides
guidance on applying fair value and expands required disclosures.
SFAS No. 137 is effective beginning in the first quarter of
2008. The Company is currently assessing the impact SFAS
No. 157 may have on the consolidated financial statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS
No. 159). This statement permits, but does not require,
entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain
other items as fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective for us
beginning in the first quarter of 2008. The Company is currently
assessing the impact SFAS No. 159 may have on the consolidated
financial statements.
In June,
2007, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
issued Statement of Position (SOP) 07-1, Clarification of the
Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide Investment Companies
and Accounting for Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors
for Investments in Investment Companies. This SOP provides
guidance for determining whether an entity is within the scope of the
AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide Investment Companies (the
Guide). Entities that are within the scope of the Guide are
required, among other things, to carry their investments at fair
value, with changes in fair value included in earnings. The
provisions of this SOP are effective for the Company on January 1,
2008. The Company is currently evaluating this new guidance and has
not determined whether it will be required to apply the provisions of
the Guide in presenting its financial statements.
12.
Commitments and Contingencies
The
Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise
in the ordinary course of business. These matters are frequently
covered by insurance. If it has been determined that a loss is
probable to occur, the estimated amount of the loss is accrued in the
consolidated financial statements. While the resolution of these
matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes the
final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect
on the Companys financial statements.
13
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
In this Managements Discussion and Analysis, the Partnership refers to America First Tax Exempt
Investors, L.P. and its subsidiary on a consolidated basis and the Company refers to the
consolidated financial information of the Partnership and certain entities that own multifamily
apartment projects financed with mortgage revenue bonds held by the Partnership that are treated as
variable interest entities (VIEs) because the Partnership has been determined to be the primary
beneficiary of these entities although it does not hold an equity position in them.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Companys critical accounting policies are the same as those described in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Executive Summary
The Partnerships purpose is to acquire and hold as long-term investments a portfolio of federally
tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds which have been issued to provide construction and/or permanent
financing of multifamily residential apartments. At June 30, 2007, the Partnership held 16 tax
exempt mortgage bonds, eight of which are secured by properties held by VIEs and, therefore,
eliminated in consolidation on the Companys financial statements. The properties underlying the
eight non-consolidated tax-exempt mortgage bonds contain a total of 1,034 rental units. At June
30, 2006, the Partnership held four non-consolidated tax-exempt mortgage bonds secured by apartment
properties containing a total of 574 rental units.
To facilitate its investment strategy of acquiring additional tax exempt mortgage bonds secured by
multifamily apartment properties, the Partnership may acquire ownership positions in apartment
properties (MF Properties). The Partnership expects to ultimately restructure the property
ownership through a sale of the MF Properties and a syndication of low income housing tax credits
(LIHTCs). The Partnership expects to provide the tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds to the new
property owners as part of the restructuring. Such restructurings will generally be expected to
be initiated within 36 months of the initial investment in MF Properties and will often coincide
with the expiration of the compliance period relating to LIHTCs previously issued with respect to
the MF Property. The Partnership will not acquire LIHTCs in connection with these transactions. As
of June 30, 2007, the Partnerships wholly-owned subsidiary, America First LP Holding Corp., held
limited partnership interests in six entities that own MF Properties containing a total of 544
rental units.
The VIEs primary operating strategy focuses on multifamily apartment properties as long-term
investments. Each VIE owns one multifamily apartment property that has been financed by a
tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond held by the Partnership. As of June 30, 2007, the Company
consolidated eight VIE multifamily apartment properties containing a total of 1,764 rental units.
As of June 30, 2006, the Company consolidated nine VIE multifamily apartment properties containing
a total of 2,256 rental units.
The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the Partnership and
the VIEs. All significant transactions and accounts between the Partnership and the VIEs have been
eliminated in consolidation. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
14
Information Regarding Apartment Properties
The following table outlines certain information regarding the apartment properties on which the
Partnership holds tax-exempt mortgage bonds (separately identifying those treated as VIEs) and the
MF Properties owned by the Partnership. The narrative discussion that follows provides a more
detailed operating analysis of each property during the first six months of 2007. No narrative is
provided for the MF Properties since they were not acquired until June 29, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Percentage of Occupied |
|
Economic Occupancy (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
of Units |
|
Units as of June 30, |
|
for the period ended June 30, |
Property Name |
|
|
|
Location |
|
of Units |
|
Occupied |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Non-Consolidated Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chandler Creek Apartments |
|
Round Rock, TX |
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
94 |
% |
|
|
93 |
% |
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
66 |
% |
Clarkson College |
|
Omaha, NE |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
84 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
Deerfield Apartments |
|
Blair, NE |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
69 |
% |
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
72 |
% |
Bella Vista Apartments (2) |
|
|
|
Gainesville, TX |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
86 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
Woodland Park (3) |
|
|
|
Topeka, KS |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Prairiebrook Village (3) |
|
|
|
Gardner, KS |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Gardens of DeCordova (3) |
|
|
|
Granbury, TX |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Gardens of Weatherford(3) |
|
|
|
Weatherford, TX |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,034 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
83 |
% |
|
|
82 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
87 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VIEs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashley Pointe at Eagle Crest |
|
Evansville, IN |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
97 |
% |
|
|
97 |
% |
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
88 |
% |
Ashley Square |
|
Des Moines, IA |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
94 |
% |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
84 |
% |
Bent Tree Apartments |
|
Columbia, SC |
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
82 |
% |
|
|
82 |
% |
Fairmont Oaks Apartments |
|
Gainsville, FL |
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
99 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
89 |
% |
Iona Lakes Apartments |
|
Ft. Myers, FL |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
74 |
% |
|
|
96 |
% |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
94 |
% |
Lake Forest Apartments |
|
Daytona Beach, FL |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
99 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
Woodbridge Apts. of Bloomington III |
|
Bloomington, IN |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
89 |
% |
|
|
84 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
93 |
% |
Woodbridge Apts. of Louisville II |
|
Louisville, KY |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
94 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
93 |
% |
|
|
87 |
% |
|
|
87 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MF Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Ridge(4) |
|
|
|
Erlanger, KY |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Meadowview (4) |
|
|
|
Highland Heights, KY |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
94 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Crescent Village(4) |
|
|
|
Cincinnati, OH |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
97 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Willow Bend (4) |
|
|
|
Columbus (Hilliard), OH |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
99 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Postwoods I (4) |
|
|
|
Reynoldsburg, OH |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Postwoods II (4) |
|
|
|
Reynoldsburg, OH |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
94 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
94 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Economic occupancy is presented for the six months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006, and is defined as the net rental income received divided by the maximum amount of
rental income to be derived from each property. This statistic is reflective of rental
concessions, delinquent rents and non-revenue units such as model units and employee units.
Actual occupancy is a point in time measure while economic occupancy is a measurement over the
period presented, therefore, economic occupancy for a period may
exceed the actual occupancy
at any point in time. |
|
(2) |
|
Bella Vista was under initial construction as of June 30, 2006, and therefore has
no occupancy data for that period. |
|
(3) |
|
These properties were under initial construction as of June 30, 2007, and therefore
has no occupancy data. |
|
(4) |
|
Previous period data and economic occupancy percentages are
not available for MF Properties due to date of acquisition. |
Ashley Pointe Ashley Pointe at Eagle Crest is located in Evansville, Indiana. In the first
half of 2007, Net Operating Income (calculated as property revenue less salaries, advertising,
administration, utilities, repair and maintenance, insurance, taxes, and management fee expenses)
was $267,000 as compared to $254,000 in 2006. This slight increase was the result of lower utility
expenses.
15
Ashley Square Ashley Square Apartments is located in Des Moines, Iowa. In the first half of
2007, Net Operating Income was $125,000 as compared to $165,000 in 2006. This decrease was the
result of a decline in rental revenues due to a significant capital improvement project which
resulted in varying numbers of rental
units being unavailable for rent. Operational expenses, primarily snow removal costs, also
contributed to this decline. The capital improvement project was completed in the first quarter of
2007 and property management saw improved occupancy and rental revenue figures in the second
quarter.
Bella Vista Bella Vista Apartments is located in Gainesville, Texas. Construction was completed
in May 2007. June 2007 was the first full month of operations at Bella Vista. Net Operating
income for the month was $56,920.
Bent Tree Bent Tree Apartments is located in Columbia, South Carolina. In the first half of
2007, Net Operating Income was $390,000 as compared to $313,000 in 2006. This increase was the
result of both increased revenues and lower operating expenses. Specifically, total property
revenue increased $28,000 while repair, utility expenses, and general office expenses declined
$27,000.
Chandler Creek Chandler Creek Apartments is located in Round Rock, Texas. In the first half of
2007, the property recognized Net Operating Income of $469,000 as compared to Net Operating Income
of $311,000 in 2006. The gain is primarily attributable to a successful real estate tax
assessments appeal of approximately $141,000 for the period. Partially offsetting the affects of
this appeal were decreases in total revenue and increases in administrative costs for the period.
The Chandler Creek bonds are in technical default and interest is being paid on these bonds at a
rate below the stated rate. Chandler Creek is current on these reduced rate interest payments.
Clarkson College Clarkson College is a 142 bed student housing facility located in Omaha,
Nebraska. In the first half of 2007, Net Operating Income was $457,000 as compared to $341,000 in
2006. The increase is attributable to increases in occupancy resulting in increased property
revenue. Clarkson College is current on its base interest payments on the bond held by the
Partnership on this property.
Deerfield Deerfield Apartments is located in Blair, Nebraska. In the first half of 2007, Net
Operating Income was $64,000. Occupancy, and thereby rental revenues, at Deerfield is the
propertys most significant operating issue. Property management is working diligently on this
issue. Deerfield is current on its base interest payments on the bonds held by the Partnership on
this property.
Fairmont Oaks Fairmont Oaks Apartments is located in Gainesville, Florida. In the first half of
2007, Net Operating Income was $423,000 as compared to $362,000 in 2006. This increase was the
result of increased rental revenues resulting from increased rental rates.
Gardens of DeCordova The Gardens of DeCordova Apartments is currently under construction in
Granbury, Texas and will contain 76 units upon completion. Construction is scheduled to be
complete in August 2008.
Gardens of Weatherford The Gardens of Weatherford Apartments is currently under construction in
Weatherford, Texas and will contain 76 units upon completion. Construction is scheduled to be
complete in August 2008.
Iona Lakes Iona Lakes Apartments is located in Fort Myers, Florida. In the first half of 2007,
Net Operating Income was $686,000 as compared to $822,000 in 2006. This decline is directly
attributable to a decline in occupancy. The decline in occupancy resulted from a number of
month-to-month tenants returning to their hurricane damaged homes where repairs were recently
completed.
16
Lake Forest Lake Forest Apartments is located in Daytona Beach, Florida. In the first half of
2007, Net Operating Income was $573,000 as compared to $600,000 in 2006. This decrease was
attributable to increased real estate taxes and property and liability insurance costs.
Prairiebrook Village Prairiebrook Village Apartments is currently under construction in Gardner,
Kansas and will contain 72 units upon completion. Construction is scheduled to be complete in
September 2008.
Woodbridge at Bloomington Woodbridge Apartments at Bloomington is located in Bloomington,
Indiana. In the first half of 2007, Net Operating Income was $643,000 as compared to $586,000 in
2006. The increase is due to decreased real estate tax expenses as a result of a successful
appeal.
Woodbridge at Louisville Woodbridge Apartments at Louisville is located in Louisville, Kentucky.
In the first half of 2007, Net Operating Income was $405,000 as compared to $398,000 in 2006. The
increase is due to increased rental revenues resulting from increased occupancy.
Woodland Park Woodland Park Apartments is currently under construction in Topeka, Kansas and will
contain 236 units upon completion. Construction is scheduled to be complete in January 2009.
Results of Operations
Consolidated Results of Operations
The following discussion of the Companys results of operations for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006 should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto included in Item 1 of this report as well as the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
17
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 (Consolidated)
Change in Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three |
|
|
For the Three |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property revenues |
|
$ |
3,508,156 |
|
|
$ |
3,457,715 |
|
|
$ |
50,441 |
|
Mortgage revenue bond investment income |
|
|
631,855 |
|
|
|
361,318 |
|
|
|
270,537 |
|
Other interest income |
|
|
309,101 |
|
|
|
85,456 |
|
|
|
223,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,449,112 |
|
|
|
3,904,489 |
|
|
|
544,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate operating (exclusive of items shown below) |
|
|
2,189,457 |
|
|
|
2,197,937 |
|
|
|
(8,480 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
569,503 |
|
|
|
565,654 |
|
|
|
3,849 |
|
Interest |
|
|
526,099 |
|
|
|
396,461 |
|
|
|
129,638 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
402,115 |
|
|
|
311,342 |
|
|
|
90,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,687,174 |
|
|
|
3,471,394 |
|
|
|
215,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
761,938 |
|
|
|
433,095 |
|
|
|
328,843 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,739 |
|
|
|
(211,739 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
761,938 |
|
|
$ |
644,834 |
|
|
$ |
117,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property revenues. Property revenues associated with the apartment properties of the consolidated
VIEs increased due to higher levels of other property income such as fees, charges, and interest
income. Offsetting these increases was a slight decline in rental revenues. Economic occupancy
was 85% in the second quarter of 2007 and 91% in the second quarter of 2006. Average monthly rents
per unit for the second quarter of 2007 were $627 as compared to $650 in 2006.
Mortgage revenue bond investment income. Mortgage revenue bond investment income increased in the
second quarter of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 due largely to the acquisition of $31.1
million of additional tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds in the second quarter of 2007, the
acquisition of the Deerfield tax exempt bond in October 2006, and the acquisition of the Bella
Vista tax exempt bond in April 2006. All base interest payments
due on the mortgage revenue bonds were paid currently during the second quarter of 2007.
Other interest income. The increase in other interest income from the quarter ended June 30, 2006
is attributable to an increase in temporary investments in liquid securities. The proceeds from
the sale of Northwoods Lake during the third quarter of 2006 and the
issuance of additional Beneficial Unit Certificates (BUCs) in
April of 2007 generated additional cash that was invested in short term liquid securities while the
Company explored longer term investment options.
Real estate operating expenses. Real estate operating expenses associated with the apartment
properties of the consolidated VIEs are comprised principally of real estate taxes, property
insurance, utilities, property management fees, repairs and maintenance, and salaries and related
employee expenses of on-site employees. A portion of real estate operating expenses are fixed in
nature, thus a decrease in physical and economic occupancy would result in a reduction in operating
margins. Conversely, as physical and economic occupancy
18
increase, the fixed nature of these
expenses will increase operating margins as these real estate operating
expenses would not increase at the same rate as rental revenues. Overall real estate expenses
during the second quarter of 2007 were consistent with those incurred in the second quarter of
2006.
Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization consist primarily of
depreciation associated with the apartment properties of the consolidated VIEs. The Company
incurred additional depreciation expense in the second quarter of 2007 due to capital improvements
at Ashley Square and Iona Lakes which were completed in the first quarter of 2007. This increase
was offset, however, by a reduction in depreciation expenses at Ashley Pointe due to certain assets
at that property becoming fully depreciated in the second quarter of 2006.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased approximately $130,000 in the three month period
ended June 30, 2007 compared to June 30, 2006. The increase in interest expense was due to a
higher average interest rate on the Companys borrowings and higher levels of borrowing. The
average interest rate on Company borrowings was 4.5% per annum during the second quarter of 2007 as
compared to 3.9% per annum in second quarter 2006 and accounted for approximately $69,000 of the
increase. Higher levels of borrowing during the second quarter of 2007 resulted in additional
interest expense of approximately $150,000.
Offsetting this increase in interest expense were the effects of the interest rate cap agreements
which decreased interest expense by approximately $92,000 more in the second quarter of 2007 than
the second quarter of 2006. The Company manages its interest rate risk on its debt financing by
entering into interest rate cap agreements that cap the amount of interest expense it pays on its
floating rate debt financing. The Companys interest rate cap agreements do not qualify for hedge
accounting, and, therefore, any changes in the fair value of the caps are recognized in current
period earnings. Fair value changes are classified as adjustments to interest expense in the
consolidated statements of operations. These fair value adjustments through earnings can cause a
significant fluctuation in reported net income, although it has no impact on the Companys cash
flow.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased in the second
quarter of 2007 compared to the second quarter of 2006 largely due to printing costs, professional
fees and travel costs associated with new investments made during the period.
Discontinued Operations. During the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Northwoods Lake Apartments, a
VIE, was considered a discontinued operation and, accordingly, its results of operations for such
period were reported as discontinued operations and disclosed as a single line item on the
Companys consolidated statements of operations. The sale of Northwoods Lake Apartments was
completed in August of 2006. No operations were classified as discontinued operations during the
second quarter of 2007.
19
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 (Consolidated)
Change in Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six |
|
|
For the Six |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property revenues |
|
$ |
7,084,406 |
|
|
$ |
6,858,152 |
|
|
$ |
226,254 |
|
Mortgage revenue bond investment income |
|
|
1,054,293 |
|
|
|
626,368 |
|
|
|
427,925 |
|
Other interest income |
|
|
517,875 |
|
|
|
217,264 |
|
|
|
300,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,656,574 |
|
|
|
7,701,784 |
|
|
|
954,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate operating (exclusive of items shown below) |
|
|
4,150,972 |
|
|
|
4,322,135 |
|
|
|
(171,163 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,056,883 |
|
|
|
1,178,906 |
|
|
|
(122,023 |
) |
Interest |
|
|
1,054,897 |
|
|
|
780,942 |
|
|
|
273,955 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
693,107 |
|
|
|
719,626 |
|
|
|
(26,519 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,955,859 |
|
|
|
7,001,609 |
|
|
|
(45,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
1,700,715 |
|
|
|
700,175 |
|
|
|
1,000,540 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
405,194 |
|
|
|
(405,194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,700,715 |
|
|
$ |
1,105,369 |
|
|
$ |
595,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property revenues. Property revenues increased due to higher levels of other property income such
as fees, charges, and interest income. Offsetting these increases was a slight decline in rental
revenues. Economic occupancy was 87% in the first half of both 2007 and 2006. Average monthly
rents per unit for the first half of 2007 were $638 as compared to $645 in 2006.
Mortgage revenue bond investment income. Mortgage revenue bond investment income increased in the
first half of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 due largely to the acquisition of $31.1
million of additional tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds in the second quarter of 2007, the
acquisition of the Deerfield tax exempt bond in October 2006, and the acquisition of the Bella
Vista tax exempt bond in April 2006. All base interest payments
due on the mortgage revenue bonds were paid currently during the first half of 2007.
Other interest income. The increase in other interest income from the half ended June 30, 2006 is
attributable to an increase in temporary investments in liquid securities. The proceeds from the
sale of Northwoods Lake during the third quarter of 2006 and the issuance of additional BUCs in
April of 2007 generated additional cash that was invested in short term liquid securities while the
Company explored longer term investment options.
Real estate operating expenses. Real estate operating expenses associated with the apartment
properties of the consolidated VIEs are comprised principally of real estate taxes, property
insurance, utilities, property management fees, repairs and maintenance, and salaries and related
employee expenses of on-site employees. A portion of real estate operating expenses are fixed in
nature, thus a decrease in physical and economic occupancy would result in a reduction in operating
margins. Conversely, as physical and economic occupancy
increase, the fixed nature of these
expenses will increase operating margins as these real estate operating
20
expenses would not increase
at the same rate as rental revenues. Real estate expenses decreased in the first half of 2007
compared to the same period of 2006. Specifically, successful real estate tax appeals resulted in
a $100,000 decline in real estate tax expenses. Salaries increased by approximately $57,000 while
administrative and utilities costs decreased approximately a combined $93,000.
Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization consist primarily of
depreciation associated with the apartment properties of the consolidated VIEs. For the first half
of 2007, the Company saw a reduction in depreciation expenses due to certain assets at Ashley
Pointe becoming fully depreciated in the second quarter of 2006.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased approximately $274,000 in the six month period ended
June 30, 2007 compared to June 30, 2006. The increase in interest expense was due to a higher
average interest rate on the Companys borrowings and higher levels of borrowing. The average
interest rate on Company borrowings was 4.4% per annum during the first half of 2007 as compared to
3.9% per annum in the first half of 2006 and accounted for approximately $120,000 of the increase.
Higher levels of borrowing during the second quarter of 2007 resulted in additional interest
expense of approximately $149,000.
Offsetting this increase in interest expense were the effects of the interest rate cap agreements
which decreased interest expense by approximately $5,000 less in the first half of 2007 than the
first half of 2006. The Company manages its interest rate risk on its debt financing by entering
into interest rate cap agreements that cap the amount of interest expense it pays on its floating
rate debt financing. The Companys interest rate cap agreements do not qualify for hedge
accounting, and, therefore, any changes in the fair value of the caps are recognized in current
period earnings. Fair value changes are classified as adjustments to interest expense in the
consolidated statements of operations. These fair value adjustments through earnings can cause a
significant fluctuation in reported net income, although it has no impact on the Companys cash
flow.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses were lower in the first
half of 2007 compared to the first half of 2006 due to litigation related expenses incurred in the
first half of 2006. The elimination of these litigation expenses was partially offset in the first
half of 2007 by printing costs, professional fees and travel costs associated with new investments made during the period.
Discontinued Operations. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, Northwoods Lake Apartments, a
VIE, was considered a discontinued operation and accordingly, its results of operations for such
period were reported as discontinued operations and disclosed as a single line item on the
Companys consolidated statements of operations. The sale of Northwoods Lake Apartments was
completed in August of 2006. No operations were classified as discontinued operations during the
first six months of 2007.
Partnership Only Results of Operations
The following discussion of the Partnerships results of operations for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 reflects the operations of the Partnership without the consolidation
of the VIEs, which is required under FIN 46R. This information is used by management to analyze the
Partnerships operations and is reflective of the segment data discussed in Note 9 to the
consolidated financial statements. Although the Partnerships subsidiary acquired a 99% limited
partnership interest in six limited partnerships owning MF Properties on June 29, 2007, no results
of operations for the MF Properties are included in the Partnership only results of operation for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 since such acquisitions occurred on the last business
day of the period.
21
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 (Partnership Only)
Changes in Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three |
|
|
For the Three |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage revenue bond investment income |
|
$ |
2,062,194 |
|
|
$ |
1,893,548 |
|
|
$ |
168,646 |
|
Other interest income |
|
|
509,815 |
|
|
|
109,208 |
|
|
|
400,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,572,009 |
|
|
|
2,002,756 |
|
|
|
569,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
526,099 |
|
|
|
393,992 |
|
|
|
132,107 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
|
6,657 |
|
|
|
6,033 |
|
|
|
624 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
402,115 |
|
|
|
311,342 |
|
|
|
90,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
934,871 |
|
|
|
711,367 |
|
|
|
223,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1,637,138 |
|
|
$ |
1,291,389 |
|
|
$ |
345,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage revenue bond investment income. Mortgage revenue bond investment income increased in
the first half of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 due largely to the acquisition of $31.1
million of additional tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds in the second quarter of 2007, the
acquisition of the Deerfield tax exempt bond in October 2006, and the acquisition of the Bella
Vista tax exempt bond in April 2006. These increases were partially offset by the disposition of
the tax exempt bonds on Northwoods Lake in the third quarter of 2006. All base interest payments
due on the mortgage revenue bonds were paid currently during the second quarter of 2007.
Other interest income. The increase in other interest income is attributable to approximately
$231,000 of contingent interest earned in 2007 and an increase in temporary investments in liquid
securities. The proceeds from the sale of Northwoods Lake during the third quarter of 2006 and the
issuance of additional BUCs in April of 2007 generated additional cash that was invested in short
term liquid securities while the Partnership explored longer term investment options.
Interest expense Interest expense increased approximately $132,000 in the three month period ended
June 30, 2007 compared to June 30, 2006. The increase in interest expense was due to a higher
average interest rate on the Partnerships borrowings and higher levels of borrowing. The average
interest rate on Partnership borrowings was 4.5% per annum during the second quarter of 2007 as
compared to 3.9% per annum in second quarter 2006 and accounted for approximately $69,000 of the
increase. Higher levels of borrowing during the second quarter of 2007 resulted in additional
interest expense of approximately $150,000.
Offsetting the higher interest rates and amounts borrowed, were the affects of the interest rate
cap agreements which decreased interest expense by approximately $92,000 more in the second quarter
of 2007 than the second quarter of 2006. The Partnership manages its interest rate risk on its
debt financing by entering into interest rate cap agreements that cap the amount of interest
expense it pays on its floating rate debt financing. The Partnerships interest rate cap
agreements do not qualify for hedge accounting, and, therefore, any changes in the fair value of
the caps are recognized in current period earnings. Fair value changes are classified as
22
adjustments to interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations. These fair value
adjustments through earnings can cause a significant fluctuation in reported net income, although
it has no impact on the Partnerships CAD.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased in the second
quarter of 2007 compared to the second quarter of 2006 largely due to printing costs, professional
fees and travel costs associated with new investments made during the period.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 (Partnership Only)
Changes in Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six |
|
|
For the Six |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage revenue bond investment income |
|
$ |
3,909,607 |
|
|
$ |
3,664,742 |
|
|
$ |
244,865 |
|
Other interest income |
|
|
743,511 |
|
|
|
264,390 |
|
|
|
479,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,653,118 |
|
|
|
3,929,132 |
|
|
|
723,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1,054,897 |
|
|
|
776,005 |
|
|
|
278,892 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
|
13,315 |
|
|
|
12,066 |
|
|
|
1,249 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
693,107 |
|
|
|
719,626 |
|
|
|
(26,519 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,761,319 |
|
|
|
1,507,697 |
|
|
|
253,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
2,891,799 |
|
|
$ |
2,421,435 |
|
|
$ |
470,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage revenue bond investment income. Mortgage revenue bond investment income increased in
the first half of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 due largely to the acquisition of $31.1
million of additional tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds in the second quarter of 2007, the
acquisition of the Deerfield tax exempt bond in October 2006, and the acquisition of the Bella
Vista tax exempt bond in April 2006. These increases were partially offset by the disposition of
the tax exempt bonds on Northwoods Lake in the third quarter of 2006. All base interest payments
due on the mortgage revenue bonds were paid currently during the first half of 2007.
Other interest income. The increase in other interest income is attributable to approximately
$231,000 of contingent interest earned in 2007 and an increase in temporary investments in liquid
securities. The proceeds from the sale of Northwoods Lake during the third quarter of 2006 and the
issuance of additional BUCs in April of 2007 generated additional cash that was invested in short
term liquid securities while the Partnership explored longer term investment options.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased approximately $279,000 in the six month period ended
June 30, 2007 compared to June 30, 2006. The increase in interest expense was due to a higher
average interest rate on the Partnerships borrowings and higher levels of borrowing. The average
interest rate on Partnership borrowings was 4.4% per annum during the first half of 2007 as
compared to 3.9% per annum in the first half of
23
2006 and accounted for approximately $120,000 of
the increase. Higher levels of borrowing during the second quarter of 2007 resulted in additional
interest expense of approximately $149,000.
Offsetting the higher interest rates and amounts borrowed, were the affects of the interest rate
cap agreements which decreased interest expense by approximately $5,000 less in the first half of
2007 than the first half of 2006. The Partnership manages its interest rate risk on its debt
financing by entering into interest rate cap agreements that cap the amount of interest expense it
pays on its floating rate debt financing. The Partnerships interest rate cap agreements do not
qualify for hedge accounting, and, therefore, any changes in the fair value of the caps are
recognized in current period earnings. Fair value changes are classified as adjustments to
interest
expense in the consolidated statements of operations. These fair value adjustments through
earnings can cause a significant fluctuation in reported net income, although it has no impact on
the Partnerships CAD.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses were lower in the first
half of 2007 compared to the first half of 2006 due to litigation related expenses incurred in the
first half of 2006. The elimination of these litigation expenses was partially offset in the first
half of 2007 by printing costs, professional fees and travel costs associated with new investments made during the period.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Partnership Liquidity
Tax-exempt interest earned on the mortgage revenue bonds, including those financing properties held
by VIEs, represents the Partnerships principal source of cash flow. The Partnership may also
receive cash distributions from equity interests held in MF Properties. Tax-exempt interest is
primarily comprised of base interest payments received on the Partnerships tax-exempt mortgage
revenue bonds. Certain of the tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds may also generate payments of
contingent interest to the Partnership from time to time when the underlying apartment properties
generate excess cash flow. Since base interest on each of the Partnerships mortgage revenue bonds
is fixed, the Partnerships cash receipts tend to be fairly constant period to period unless the
Partnership acquires or disposes of its investments in tax-exempt bonds. Changes in the economic
performance of the properties financed by tax-exempt bonds with a contingent interest provision
will affect the amount of contingent interest, if any, paid to the Partnership. Similarly, the
economic performance of MF Properties will affect the amount of cash distributions, if any,
received by the Partnership from its ownership of these properties. The economic performance of a
multifamily apartment property depends on the rental and occupancy rates of the property and on the
level of operating expenses. Occupancy rates and rents are directly affected by the supply of, and
demand for, apartments in the market area in which a property is located. This, in turn, is
affected by several factors such as local or national economic conditions, the amount of new
apartment construction and the affordability of single-family homes. In addition, factors such as
government regulation (such as zoning laws), inflation, real estate and other taxes, labor problems
and natural disasters can affect the economic operations of an apartment property. The primary
uses of cash by apartment properties are: (i) the payment of operating expenses; and (ii) the
payment of debt service. Other sources of cash include debt financing and the sale of additional
BUCs.
The Partnerships principal uses of cash are the payment of distributions to BUC holders, interest
and principal on debt financing and general and administrative expenses. The Partnership also uses
cash to acquire additional investments. Distributions to BUC holders may increase or decrease at
the determination of the General Partner. The Partnership is currently paying distributions at the
rate of $0.54 per BUC per year. The General Partner determines the amount of the distributions
based upon the projected future cash flows of the Partnership. Future distributions to BUC holders
will depend upon the amount of base and contingent interest received on its tax-exempt mortgage
revenue bonds and cash received from other investments (including MF Properties), the
24
amount of its
borrowings and the effective interest rate these borrowings, and the amount of the Partnerships
undistributed cash.
The Partnership believes that cash provided by its tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds and other
investments will be adequate to meet its projected long-term liquidity requirements, including the
payment of expenses, interest and distributions to BUC holders. Recently, income from investments
has not been sufficient to fund such expenditures without utilizing cash reserves to supplement the
deficit. See discussion below regarding Cash Available for Distribution.
VIE Liquidity
The VIEs primary source of cash is net rental revenues generated by their real estate investments.
Net rental revenues from a multifamily apartment property depend on the rental and occupancy rates
of the property and on the level of operating expenses. Occupancy rates and rents are directly
affected by the supply of, and demand for, apartments in the market area in which a property is
located. This, in turn, is affected by several factors such as local or national economic
conditions, the amount of new apartment construction and the affordability of single-family homes.
In addition, factors such as government regulation (such as zoning laws), inflation, real estate
and other taxes, labor problems and natural disasters can affect the economic operations of an
apartment property.
The VIEs primary uses of cash are: (i) the payment of operating expenses; and (ii) the payment of
debt service on the VIEs bonds and mortgage notes payable which are held by the Partnership.
Consolidated Liquidity
On a consolidated basis, cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30,
2007 decreased $1,587,814 compared to the same period a year earlier mainly due to changes in
working capital components. Cash from investing activities decreased
$42,224,050, for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 primarily due to the purchase of the
MF Properties and the acquisition of additional tax-exempt revenue bonds in 2007. Cash from
financing activities increased $45,175,782 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the
same period in 2006. This is the result of the receipt of proceeds from the mortgage for the MF
Properties, additional issuances of debt in the P-Float program, and the sale of additional
Beneficial Unit Certificates offset by the payment of liabilities assumed.
In connection with the acquisition of the Property Partnerships an aggregate loan of approximately
$19.9 million from JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. was utilized to refinance the existing mortgages
acquired in the transaction. The interest rate on this mortgage is variable and is calculated as
LIBOR plus 1.55%. As of the transaction date, LIBOR was 5.32% and the interest on the mortgage was
6.87%. The mortgage matures in July 2009. In addition, the Company entered into two new P-Float
securitization transactions for a total of $13.3 million of new debt. Such securitization
transactions through the Merrill Lynch P-Float program are accounted for as secured borrowings and,
in effect, provide variable-rate financing for the acquisition of new, or the securitization of
existing, tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds. This debt financing bears interest at a weekly
floating bond rate, including associated remarketing, credit enhancement, liquidity and trustee
fees. The average interest rates for all debt in the P-Float program was 4.4% per annum and 3.9%
per annum during the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Maturity dates for the
Companys debt financing range from 2008 through 2038.
Recently
the financial markets have experienced a re-pricing of risk and a
reduction of liquidity in response to serious credit issues being
experienced in the single-family subprime mortgage industry. The
Partnership is an investor in multi-family properties and tax-exempt
mortgage bonds and does not have single family or subprime exposures.
The general partner believes that the current tightening of credit
may create opportunities for additional investments consistent with
the Partnerships investment strategy.
Cash Available for Distribution (CAD)
25
Management utilizes a calculation of Cash Available for Distribution (CAD) as a means to
determine the Partnerships ability to make distributions to BUC holders. The General Partner
believes that CAD provides relevant information about its operations and is necessary along with
net income for understanding its operating results. To calculate CAD, amortization expense related
to debt financing costs and bond reissuance costs, Tier 2 income due to the General Partner as
defined in the Agreement of Limited Partnership, interest rate cap expense or income, provision for
loan losses, impairments on bonds, losses related to VIEs including the cumulative effect of
accounting change and depreciation expense are added back to the Companys net income (loss) as
computed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP). Management evaluates two measures of CAD by further breaking down the calculation
into Total CAD and CAD excluding contingent interest and realized gains. There is no generally
accepted methodology for computing CAD, and the Companys computation of CAD may not be comparable
to CAD reported by
other companies. Although the Company considers CAD to be a useful measure of its operating
performance, CAD should not be considered as an alternative to net income or net cash flows from
operating activities which are calculated in accordance with GAAP.
The Partnerships regular annual distributions are currently equal to $0.54 per BUC, or $0.135 per
quarter per BUC. In recent years, CAD excluding contingent interest and realized gains has not
been sufficient to fund such distributions without utilizing cash reserves to supplement the
deficit. In addition, the Partnership issued 3,675,000 additional BUCs in April 2007 and may issue
additional BUCs in the future. The General Partner believes that the Partnership has an
opportunity to increase its CAD excluding contingent interest and realized gains to a level that
equals or exceeds the current distribution rate by fully investing, on a leveraged basis, the cash
and cash equivalents currently held by the Partnership in new investments. As of June 30, 2007,
the Partnership is not fully invested, on a leveraged basis. Additionally, the impact on CAD of
the significant investments made during the second quarter will not be fully realized until the
third quarter. The General Partner believes that current investment opportunities will allow the
Partnership to become fully invested in the near future. The General Partner currently estimates
that the impact on CAD of investments made during the second quarter will be sufficient to increase
CAD to a level that equals or exceeds the current quarterly distribution amount.
The following tables show the calculation of CAD and the break-down of Total CAD and CAD excluding
contingent interest and realized gains for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three |
|
|
For the three |
|
|
For the six |
|
|
For the six |
|
|
|
months ended |
|
|
months ended |
|
|
months ended |
|
|
months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
761,938 |
|
|
$ |
644,834 |
|
|
$ |
1,700,715 |
|
|
$ |
1,105,369 |
|
Net loss from VIEs |
|
|
1,456,747 |
|
|
|
1,420,806 |
|
|
|
2,503,573 |
|
|
|
2,862,105 |
|
Eliminations due to VIE consolidation |
|
|
(581,547 |
) |
|
|
(774,251 |
) |
|
|
(1,312,489 |
) |
|
|
(1,546,038 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before impact of VIE consolidation |
|
|
1,637,138 |
|
|
|
1,291,389 |
|
|
|
2,891,799 |
|
|
|
2,421,436 |
|
Change in fair value of derivatives and interest
rate cap amortization |
|
|
(149,839 |
) |
|
|
(58,140 |
) |
|
|
(117,886 |
) |
|
|
(123,136 |
) |
Tier 2 Income |
|
|
(57,830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57,830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense (Partnership only) |
|
|
6,657 |
|
|
|
6,033 |
|
|
|
13,315 |
|
|
|
12,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total CAD |
|
$ |
1,436,126 |
|
|
$ |
1,239,282 |
|
|
$ |
2,729,398 |
|
|
$ |
2,310,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent interest and realized gains Contingent
interest |
|
$ |
231,319 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
231,319 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAD from contingent interest and realized gains |
|
|
231,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAD excluding contingent interest and realized gains |
|
$ |
1,204,807 |
|
|
$ |
1,239,282 |
|
|
$ |
2,498,079 |
|
|
$ |
2,310,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of units outstanding, basic
and diluted |
|
|
13,050,565 |
|
|
|
9,837,928 |
|
|
|
11,453,121 |
|
|
|
9,837,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total CAD per unit |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
CAD from contingent interest and realized gains, per
unit |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
CAD excluding contingent interest and realized gains,
per unit |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
Contractual Obligations Table
The Partnership had the following contractual obligations as of June 30, 2007.
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
1-3 |
|
3-5 |
|
More than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
1 year |
|
years |
|
years |
|
5 years |
Debt financing |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
58,940,000 |
|
|
$ |
7,915,000 |
|
|
$ |
10,535,000 |
|
|
$ |
27,190,000 |
|
|
$ |
13,300,000 |
|
Mortgage payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,920,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,920,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coupon rate(s) (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.59 |
% |
|
|
6.07 |
% |
|
|
4.61 |
% |
|
|
4.63 |
% |
Interest (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,027,749 |
|
|
$ |
2,032,456 |
|
|
$ |
6,821,849 |
|
|
$ |
2,691,283 |
|
|
$ |
8,482,161 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Effective interest rates differ as described in Item 5 Debt Financing, interest rates shown are
the average effective rate, including fees, for the six months ended June 30, 2007 |
|
(2) |
|
Interest shown is estimated based upon current effective interest rates through maturity |
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. The interpretation clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in tax positions. The interpretation, effective for the Company beginning in the first
quarter of 2007, did not have a material effect on the Partnership.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, Fair Value
Measurement (SFAS No. 157). This statement does
not require new fair value measurements, however, it provides
guidance on applying fair value and expands required disclosures.
SFAS No. 157 is effective beginning in the first quarter of
2008. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS
No. 157 may have on the consolidated financial statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS
No. 159). This statement permits, but does not require,
entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain
other items at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective for us
beginning in the first quarter of 2008. The Company is currently
assessing the impact SFAS No. 159 may have on the consolidated
financial statements.
In June,
2007, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
issued Statement of Position (SOP) 07-1, Clarification of
the Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide Investment Companies
and Accounting for Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors
for Investments in Investment Companies. This SOP provides
guidance for determining whether an entity is within the scope of the
AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide Investment Companies (the
Guide). Entities that are within the scope of the Guide are required,
among other things, to carry their investments at fair value, with
changes in fair value included in earnings. The provisions of this
SOP are effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. The
Company is currently evaluating this new guidance and has not
determined whether it will be required to apply the provisions of the
Guide in presenting its financial statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Other than the additional interest rate caps the Partnership purchased in May and June of 2007 as
detailed in Note 8 and the variable interest rate debt described in
Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, there have been no material
changes in market risk from the information provided under Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures about Market Risk in Item 7A of the Companys 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. The Partnerships Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer have reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnerships
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of
the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer
and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Partnerships current disclosure controls
and procedures are effective, providing them with material information relating to the Partnership
as required to be disclosed in the reports the Partnership files or submits under the Exchange Act
on a timely basis.
(b) Changes in internal controls over financial reporting. There were no changes in the
Partnerships internal control over financial reporting during the Partnerships most recent fiscal
quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Partnerships internal control over financial reporting.
28
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Registrant is subject.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
The risk factors affecting the Company are described in 1A Risk Factors of the Companys 2006
Annual Report on Form 10-K. Additional risks include the following:
If the Partnership acquires direct ownership of apartment properties it will be subject to all of
the risks normally associated with the ownership of commercial real estate.
The Partnership may acquire ownership of apartment complexes financed by tax-exempt bonds held by
it in the event of a default on such bonds. The Partnership may also acquire ownership of
apartment complexes on a temporary basis in order to facilitate the eventual acquisition of
tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds on the properties. In either case, during the time the
Partnership owns an apartment complex, it will generate taxable income or losses from the
operations of such property rather than tax exempt interest. In addition, the Partnership will be
subject to all of the risks normally associated with the operation of commercial real estate
including declines in property value, occupancy and rental rates and increases in operating
expenses. The Partnership may also be subject to government regulations, natural disasters and
environmental issues, any of which could have an adverse affect on the Partnerships financial
results and ability to make distributions to BUC holders.
There are a number of risks related to the construction of multifamily apartment properties that
may affect the tax-exempt bonds issued to finance these properties.
Four of the tax-exempt revenue bonds the Partnership currently holds are secured by multifamily
apartment properties which are still under construction. The Partnership may acquire additional
tax-exempt revenue bonds issued to finance apartment properties in various stages of construction.
Construction of such properties generally takes approximately 12 to 18 months. The principal risk
associated with construction lending is the risk that construction of the property will be
substantially delayed or never completed. This may occur for a number of reasons including (i)
insufficient financing to complete the project due to underestimated construction costs or cost
overruns; (ii) failure of contractors or subcontractors to perform under their agreements, (iii)
inability to obtain governmental approvals; (iv) labor disputes, and (v) adverse weather and other
unpredictable contingencies beyond the control of the developer. While the Partnership may be able
to protect itself from some of these risks by obtaining construction completion guarantees from
developers, agreements of construction lenders to purchase its bonds if construction is not
completed on time, and/or payment and performance bonds from contractors, the Partnership may not
be able to do so in all cases or such guarantees or bonds may not fully protect it in the event a
property is not completed. In other cases, the Partnership may decide to forego certain types of
available security if it determines that the security is not necessary or is too expensive to
obtain in relation to the risks covered. If a property is not completed, or costs more to complete
than anticipated, it may cause the Partnership to receive less than the full amount of interest
owed to it on the tax-exempt bond financing such property or otherwise result in a default under
the mortgage loan that secures its tax-exempt bond on the property. In such case, the Partnership
may be forced to foreclose on the incomplete property and sell it in order to recover the principal
and accrued interest on its tax-exempt bond and it may suffer a loss of capital as a result.
Alternatively, the Partnership may decide to finance the remaining construction of the property, in
which event it will need to invest additional funds into the property,
29
either as equity or as a taxable loan. Any return on this additional investment would not be
tax-exempt. Also, if the Partnership forecloses on a property, it will no longer receive
tax-exempt interest on the bond issued to finance the property. In addition, the overall return to
the Partnership from its investment in such property is likely to be less than if the construction
had been completed on time or within budget.
There are a number of risks related to the lease-up of newly constructed or renovated properties
that may affect the tax-exempt bonds issued to finance these properties.
Four of the tax-exempt revenue bonds the Partnership currently invests in are secured by affordable
multifamily apartment properties which are still under construction. The Partnership may acquire
additional tax-exempt revenue bonds issued to finance properties in various stages of construction
or renovation. As construction or renovation is completed, these properties will move into the
lease-up phase. The lease-up of these properties may not be completed on schedule or at
anticipated rent levels, resulting in a greater risk that these investments may go into default
than investments secured by mortgages on properties that are stabilized or fully leased-up. The
underlying property may not achieve expected occupancy or debt service coverage levels. While the
Partnership may require property developers to provide it with a guarantee covering operating
deficits of the property during the lease-up phase, it may not be able to do so in all cases or
such guarantees may not fully protect the Partnership in the event a property is not leased up to
an adequate level of economic occupancy as anticipated.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not Applicable
Item 6. Exhibits.
The following exhibits are filed as required by Item 6 of this report. Exhibit numbers refer to the
paragraph numbers under Item 601 of Regulation S-K:
3. Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of America First Fiduciary Corporation Number
Five (incorporated herein by reference to Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No.
2-99997) filed by America First Tax Exempt Mortgage Fund Limited Partnership on August
30, 1985).
4(a) Form of Certificate of Beneficial Unit Certificate (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-50513) filed
by the Company on April 17, 1998).
4(b) Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Partnership (incorporated herein by
reference to the Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K (No. 000-24843) filed by the
Company on June 28, 1999).
4(c) Amended Agreement of Merger, dated June 12, 1998, between the Partnership and
America First Tax Exempt Mortgage Fund Limited Partnership (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No.
333-50513) filed by the Company on September 14, 1998).
30
10(a) Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated May 7, 2007, by and among America First LP
Holding Corp. (a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Partnership), Atlantic Development GP
Holding Corp., Joint Development & Housing Corporation, Boston Financial Institutional
Tax Credits II, a Limited Partnership, Boston Financial Institutional Tax Credits III,
a Limited Partnership, Boston Financial Institutional Tax Credits IV, a Limited
Partnership, and SLP, Inc.
10(b) Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Crescent
Village Townhomes Limited Partnership, dated June 29, 2007 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Partnership on July 6,
2007).
10(c) Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Eagle Ridge
Townhomes Limited Partnership, dated June 29, 2007 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Partnership on July 6, 2007).
10(d) Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Meadowbrook
Apartments Limited Partnership, dated June 29, 2007 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Partnership on July 6, 2007).
10(e) Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Post Wood
Townhomes Limited Partnership, dated June 29, 2007 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Partnership on July 6, 2007).
10(f) Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Post Wood
Townhomes II Limited Partnership, dated June 29, 2007 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Partnership on July 6, 2007).
10(g) Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Willow Bend
Townhomes Limited Partnership, dated June 29, 2007 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Partnership on July 6, 2007).
10(h) Guaranty, dated June 29, 2007, of the Partnership in favor of JP Morgan Chase
Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Current Report on Form 8-K
filed by the Partnership on July 6, 2007)
31.1 Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMERICA FIRST TAX EXEMPT INVESTORS, L.P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By America First Capital Associates Limited Partnership Two, General Partner of the Partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By Burlington Capital Group LLC, General Partner of America First Capital Associates Limited Partnership Two |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 14, 2007
|
|
/s/ Lisa Y. Roskens
Lisa Y. Roskens
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
Burlington Capital Group LLC, acting in its capacity as general partner
of the General Partner of America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P. |
|
|
32