UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012
OR
£ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-24843
AMERICA FIRST TAX EXEMPT INVESTORS, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| |
Delaware | 47-0810385 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| |
1004 Farnam Street, Suite 400 | Omaha, Nebraska 68102 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(402) 444-1630 |
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO £
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES x NO £
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
| | | |
Large accelerated filer £ | Accelerated filer Q | Non- accelerated filer £ | Smaller reporting company £ |
| | (do not check if a smaller reporting company) | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES £ NO Q
INDEX
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
| | | |
| Financial Statements (Unaudited) | | |
| Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets | |
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations | |
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income | |
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Partners’ Capital | |
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | |
| Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | |
| Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | |
| Controls and Procedures | |
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Forward-Looking Statements
This report (including, but not limited to, the information contained in “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”) contains forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this report, including statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, business strategy and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. When used, statements which are not historical in nature, including those containing words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “should,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” and similar expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We have based forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. This report also contains estimates and other statistical data made by independent parties and by us relating to market size and growth and other industry data. This data involves a number of assumptions and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such estimates. We have not independently verified the statistical and other industry data generated by independent parties and contained in this report and, accordingly, we cannot guarantee their accuracy or completeness.
These forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including those relating to:
| |
• | defaults on the mortgage loans securing our tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds; |
| |
• | risks associated with investing in multifamily apartments, including changes in business conditions and the general economy; |
| |
• | changes in short-term interest rates; |
| |
• | our ability to use borrowings to finance our assets; |
| |
• | current negative economic and credit market conditions; and |
| |
• | changes in government regulations affecting our business. |
Other risks, uncertainties and factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements we make. We are not obligated to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In addition, projections, assumptions and estimates of our future performance and the future performance of the industries in which we operate are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described under the headings “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 and in item 1A of Part II of this document.
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
AMERICA FIRST TAX EXEMPT INVESTORS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 |
Assets | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 17,429,602 |
| | $ | 20,201,573 |
|
Restricted cash | | 12,746,866 |
| | 13,852,753 |
|
Interest receivable | | 8,272,937 |
| | 6,984,978 |
|
Tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds held in trust, at fair value (Notes 4 & 8) | | 111,845,978 |
| | 109,152,787 |
|
Tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds, at fair value (Note 4) | | 26,730,200 |
| | 26,542,565 |
|
Real estate assets: (Note 5) | | | | |
Land | | 13,343,557 |
| | 12,430,434 |
|
Buildings and improvements | | 112,843,888 |
| | 111,653,203 |
|
Real estate assets before accumulated depreciation | | 126,187,445 |
| | 124,083,637 |
|
Accumulated depreciation | | (21,063,405 | ) | | (19,817,998 | ) |
Net real estate assets | | 105,124,040 |
| | 104,265,639 |
|
Other assets (Note 6) | | 9,287,481 |
| | 9,682,388 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations (Note 7) | | 7,287,162 |
| | 7,293,862 |
|
Total Assets | | $ | 298,724,266 |
| | $ | 297,976,545 |
|
| | | | |
Liabilities | | | | |
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities | | $ | 3,058,530 |
| | $ | 3,491,642 |
|
Distribution payable | | 3,803,400 |
| | 3,911,340 |
|
Debt financing (Note 8) | | 112,537,000 |
| | 112,673,000 |
|
Mortgages payable (Note 9) | | 41,752,135 |
| | 40,092,455 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations (Note 7) | | 6,166,328 |
| | 6,219,063 |
|
Total Liabilities | | 167,317,393 |
| | 166,387,500 |
|
| | | | |
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 13) | |
|
| |
|
|
| | | | |
Partners' Capital | | | | |
General Partner (Note 2) | | (354,861 | ) | | (354,006 | ) |
Beneficial Unit Certificate holders | | 154,826,581 |
| | 154,911,228 |
|
Unallocated deficit of Consolidated VIEs | | (23,752,821 | ) | | (23,512,962 | ) |
Total Partners' Capital | | 130,718,899 |
| | 131,044,260 |
|
Noncontrolling interest (Note 5) | | 687,974 |
| | 544,785 |
|
Total Capital | | 131,406,873 |
| | 131,589,045 |
|
Total Liabilities and Partners' Capital | | $ | 298,724,266 |
| | $ | 297,976,545 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
AMERICA FIRST TAX EXEMPT INVESTORS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended, |
| | March 31, 2012 | | March 31, 2011 |
Revenues: | | | | |
Property revenues | | $ | 4,238,929 |
| | $ | 3,565,553 |
|
Mortgage revenue bond investment income | | 2,371,404 |
| | 2,220,913 |
|
Other income | | 39,345 |
| | 251,361 |
|
Total revenues | | 6,649,678 |
| | 6,037,827 |
|
Expenses: | | | | |
Real estate operating (exclusive of items shown below) | | 2,279,934 |
| | 2,132,208 |
|
Provision for loss on receivables | | 238,175 |
| | — |
|
Depreciation and amortization | | 1,438,905 |
| | 1,133,059 |
|
Interest | | 1,318,535 |
| | 773,734 |
|
General and administrative | | 650,579 |
| | 641,595 |
|
Total expenses | | 5,926,128 |
| | 4,680,596 |
|
Income from continuing operations | | 723,550 |
| | 1,357,231 |
|
Income from discontinued operations | | 46,034 |
| | 14,004 |
|
Net income | | 769,584 |
| | 1,371,235 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest | | 139,152 |
| | 182,061 |
|
Net income - America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P. | | $ | 630,432 |
| | $ | 1,189,174 |
|
| | | | |
Net income (loss) allocated to: | | | | |
General Partner | | $ | 8,703 |
| | $ | 14,693 |
|
Limited Partners - Unitholders | | 861,588 |
| | 1,454,610 |
|
Unallocated loss of Consolidated Property VIEs | | (239,859 | ) | | (280,129 | ) |
Noncontrolling interest | | 139,152 |
| | 182,061 |
|
| | $ | 769,584 |
| | $ | 1,371,235 |
|
Unitholders' interest in net income per unit (basic and diluted): | | | | |
Net income (loss), basic and diluted, per unit | | $ | 0.03 |
| | $ | 0.05 |
|
Weighted average number of units outstanding, basic and diluted | | 30,122,928 |
| | 30,122,928 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
AMERICA FIRST TAX EXEMPT INVESTORS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 |
| | | | |
Net income | | $ | 769,584 |
| | $ | 1,371,235 |
|
Unrealized gain on securities | | 2,847,607 |
| | 2,855,558 |
|
Comprehensive income | | 3,617,191 |
| | 4,226,793 |
|
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest | | 139,152 |
| | 182,061 |
|
Comprehensive income - America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P. | | $ | 3,478,039 |
| | $ | 4,044,732 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
AMERICA FIRST TAX EXEMPT INVESTORS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 and 2011
(UNAUDITED)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| General Partner | | # of Units | | Beneficial Unit Certificate Holders | | Unallocated Deficit of Consolidated VIEs | | Non- controlling Interest | | Total | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Balance at January 1, 2012 | $ | (354,006 | ) | | 30,122,928 |
| | $ | 154,911,228 |
| | $ | (23,512,962 | ) | | $ | 544,785 |
| | $ | 131,589,045 |
| | $ | 95,894 |
|
Noncontrolling interest contribution | — |
| | | | — |
| | — |
| | 4,037 |
| | 4,037 |
| | |
Distributions paid or accrued | (38,034 | ) | | — |
| | (3,765,366 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (3,803,400 | ) | | — |
|
Net income (loss) | 8,703 |
| | — |
| | 861,588 |
| | (239,859 | ) | | 139,152 |
| | 769,584 |
| | — |
|
Unrealized gain on securities | 28,476 |
| | — |
| | 2,819,131 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,847,607 |
| | 2,847,607 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2012 | $ | (354,861 | ) | | 30,122,928 |
| | $ | 154,826,581 |
| | $ | (23,752,821 | ) | | $ | 687,974 |
| | $ | 131,406,873 |
| | $ | 2,943,501 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| General Partner | | # of Units | | Beneficial Unit Certificate Holders | | Unallocated Deficit of Consolidated VIEs | | Non- controlling Interest | | Total | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Balance at January 1, 2011 | $ | (280,629 | ) | | 30,122,928 |
| | $ | 161,389,189 |
| | $ | (32,945,669 | ) | | $ | (141,326 | ) | | $ | 128,021,565 |
| | $ | (9,692,233 | ) |
Distributions paid or accrued | (38,034 | ) | | | | (3,765,366 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (3,803,400 | ) | | |
Net income (loss) | 14,693 |
| | — |
| | 1,454,610 |
| | (280,129 | ) | | 182,061 |
| | 1,371,235 |
| | — |
|
Unrealized gain on securities | 28,556 |
| | — |
| | 2,827,002 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,855,558 |
| | 2,855,558 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2011 | $ | (275,414 | ) | | 30,122,928 |
| | $ | 161,905,435 |
| | $ | (33,225,798 | ) | | $ | 40,735 |
| | $ | 128,444,958 |
| | $ | (6,836,675 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
AMERICA FIRST TAX EXEMPT INVESTORS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | For Three Months Ended, |
| | March 31, 2012 | | March 31, 2011 |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 769,584 |
| | $ | 1,371,235 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided (used) by operating activities: | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization expense | | 1,511,315 |
| | 1,225,565 |
|
Provision for loss from receivables | | 238,175 |
| | — |
|
Non-cash loss on derivatives | | 329,340 |
| | 232,554 |
|
Bond discount amortization | | (105,140 | ) | | (116,858 | ) |
Gain on asset sold | | — |
| | (21,103 | ) |
Gain on early extinguishment of debt | | — |
| | (104,988 | ) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions | |
|
| |
|
|
Increase in interest receivable | | (1,526,134 | ) | | (1,223,846 | ) |
Increase in other assets | | 13,550 |
| | (1,056,661 | ) |
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses | | (449,445 | ) | | (529,422 | ) |
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities | | 781,245 |
| | (223,524 | ) |
Cash flows from investing activities: | |
|
| |
|
|
Capital expenditures | | (1,823,562 | ) | | (930,797 | ) |
Acquisition of tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds | | — |
| | (4,492,500 | ) |
Acquisition of partnerships, net of cash acquired | | — |
| | (20,758,476 | ) |
Proceeds from assets sold | | — |
| | 36,500 |
|
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash | | 225,705 |
| | (125,259 | ) |
Restricted cash - debt collateral released | | 650,833 |
| | 732,403 |
|
Cash released upon foreclosure | | — |
| | 2,047,161 |
|
Principal payments received on tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds | | 71,317 |
| | 101,349 |
|
Net cash used by investing activities | | (875,707 | ) | | (23,389,619 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities: | |
|
| |
|
|
Distributions paid | | (3,911,340 | ) | | (3,803,399 | ) |
(Decrease) increase in liabilities related to restricted cash | | (225,705 | ) | | 125,259 |
|
Proceeds from debt financing | | 1,673,579 |
| | 27,500,584 |
|
Deferred financing costs | | (34,188 | ) | | — |
|
Principal payments on debt financing and mortgage payable | | (186,302 | ) | | (159,464 | ) |
Sale of LP Interests - Ohio Properties | | 4,037 |
| | — |
|
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities | | (2,679,919 | ) | | 23,662,980 |
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | | (2,774,381 | ) | | 49,837 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period, including cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations of $11,840 and $18,928, respectively | | 20,213,413 |
| | 13,277,048 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period, including cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations of $9,431 and $17,601, respectively | | $ | 17,439,032 |
| | $ | 13,326,885 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information: | | | | |
Cash paid during the period for interest | | 881,291 |
| | 816,171 |
|
Distributions declared but not paid | | 3,803,400 |
| | 3,803,399 |
|
Capital expenditures financed through notes payable | | 42,929 |
| | 9,601 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2012
(UNAUDITED)
1. Basis of Presentation
General
America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P. (the “Partnership”) was formed on April 2, 1998, under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act for the primary purpose of acquiring, holding, selling and otherwise dealing with a portfolio of federally tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds which have been issued to provide construction and/or permanent financing of multifamily residential properties. Interest on these bonds is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes. As a result, most of the income earned by the Partnership is exempt from federal income taxes. The Partnership may also invest in other types of tax-exempt securities that may or may not be secured by real estate and may make taxable mortgage loans secured by multifamily properties which are financed by tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds held by the Partnership. The Partnership generally does not seek to acquire direct interests in real property as long term or permanent investments. The Partnership may, however, acquire real estate securing its tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds or taxable mortgage loans through foreclosure in the event of a default. In addition, the Partnership may acquire interests in multifamily apartment properties (“MF Properties”) in order to position itself for future investments in tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds issued to finance these properties. The Partnership expects to sell its interest in these MF Properties in connection with the future syndication of low income housing tax credits under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code ("LIHTCs") or to a tax-exempt organization and to acquire tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds on these properties to provide debt financing to the new owners.
Our general partner is America First Capital Associates Limited Partnership Two (“AFCA 2” or “General Partner”). The general partner of AFCA2 is The Burlington Capital Group LLC ("Burlington"). The Partnership has issued Beneficial Unit Certificates (“BUCs”) representing assigned limited partner interests to investors (“unitholders”). The Partnership will terminate on December 31, 2050, unless terminated earlier under provisions of its Agreement of Limited Partnership.
The condensed consolidated financial statements of the “Company” reported in this Form 10-Q include the assets, liabilities and results of operations of the Partnership, its Consolidated Subsidiaries and three other consolidated entities in which the Partnership does not hold an ownership interest but which own multifamily apartment properties financed with tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds held by the Partnership and which are treated as variable interest entities ("VIEs") of which the Partnership has been determined to be the primary beneficiary (“Consolidated VIEs”). The Consolidated Subsidiaries of the Partnership consist of:
| |
• | ATAX TEBS I, LLC, a special purpose entity owned and controlled by the Partnership, created to facilitate the Tax Exempt Bond Securitization (“TEBS”) Financing with Freddie Mac (Note 8). |
| |
• | Nine multifamily apartments ("MF Properties") owned by various Partnership subsidiaries. Such subsidiaries hold a 99% limited partner interest in five limited partnerships and 100% member positions in four limited liability companies. Three apartment properties which are subject to a sales agreement and are also reported as MF Properties (Note 5). |
| |
• | One of the five limited Partnerships which owns an MF Property is reported as a discontinued operation in both periods (Note 7). |
Stand alone financial information of the Partnership reported in this Form 10-Q includes only the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of the Partnership and its Consolidated Subsidiaries (hereafter the “Partnership”) without the Consolidated VIEs. In the Company’s consolidated financial statements, all transactions and accounts between the Partnership, the Consolidated Subsidiaries and the Consolidated VIEs have been eliminated in consolidation. The Partnership does not believe that the consolidation of VIEs for reporting under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) affects the Partnership’s status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes or the status of unitholders as partners of the Partnership, the treatment of the tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds on the properties owned by Consolidated VIEs as debt, the tax-exempt nature of the interest payments received on bonds secured by the properties owned by Consolidated VIEs or the manner in which the Partnership’s income is reported to unitholders on IRS Form K-1.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted according to such rules and regulations, although management believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. These condensed consolidated financial statements and notes have been prepared consistently with the 2011 Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal and recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position as of March 31, 2012, and the results of operations for the interim periods presented have been made. The results of operations for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
2. Partnership Income, Expenses and Cash Distributions
The Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Partnership contains provisions for the distribution of Net Interest Income, Net Residual Proceeds and Liquidation Proceeds, for the allocation of income or loss from operations and for the allocation of income and loss arising from a repayment, sale, or liquidation of investments. Income and losses will be allocated to each unitholder on a periodic basis, as determined by the General Partner, based on the number of BUCs held by each unitholder as of the last day of the period for which such allocation is to be made. Distributions of Net Interest Income and Net Residual Proceeds will be made to each unitholder of record on the last day of each distribution period based on the number of BUCs held by each unitholder as of such date. For purposes of the Agreement of Limited Partnership, cash distributions, if any, received by the Partnership from its indirect interest in MF Properties (Note 5) will be included in the Partnership’s Interest Income and cash distributions received by the Partnership from the sale of such properties will be included in the Partnership Residual Proceeds.
Cash distributions are currently made on a quarterly basis but may be made on a monthly or semiannual basis at the election of AFCA 2. On each distribution date, Net Interest Income is distributed 99% to the unitholders and 1% to AFCA 2 and Net Residual Proceeds are distributed 100% to unitholders except that Net Interest Income and Net Residual Proceeds representing contingent interest in an amount equal to 0.9% per annum of the principal amount of the tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds on a cumulative basis (defined as Net Interest Income (Tier 2) and Net Residual Proceeds (Tier 2), respectively) are distributed 75% to the unitholders and 25% to AFCA 2.
In June 2010, the Company completed a sales transaction whereby four of the MF Properties, Crescent Village, Post Woods (I and II), and Willow Bend apartments in Ohio (the “Ohio Properties”), were sold to three new ownership entities controlled by an unaffiliated not-for-profit entity. The Company acquired 100% of the $18.3 million tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds issued by the Ohio Housing Finance Agency as part of a plan of financing for the acquisition and rehabilitation of the Ohio Properties. The tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds secured by the Ohio Properties were acquired by the Company at par and consisted of two series. The Series A bond has a par value of $14.7 million and bears interest at an annual rate of 7.0%. The Series B bond has a par value of $3.6 million and bears interest at an annual interest rate of 10.0%. Both series of bonds mature in June 2050. The Company had previously acquired a 99% interest in the Ohio Properties as part of its strategy of acquiring existing multifamily apartment properties that it expects will be partially financed with new tax-exempt mortgage bonds at the time the properties become eligible for the issuance of additional LIHTCs. In addition to the new tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds acquired by the Company, the plan of financing for the acquisition included other subordinated debt issued by the Company. At the time of acquisition, the new owners had not contributed any capital to the transaction and the Company effectively provided 100% of the capital structure to the new owners as part of the sale transaction. Pursuant to accounting guidance for property, plant, and equipment - real estate sales, the sale and restructure does not meet the criteria for derecognition of the properties or full accrual accounting for the gain. The guidance requires sufficient equity at risk as part of a sales transaction to indicate a commitment from the buyer (typically a minimum of 3 to 5% investment by the new owners). Under the sales agreement, the Ohio Properties were sold for a total purchase price of $16.2 million. Cash received by the selling limited partnerships as part of the sale transaction represents a gain on the sale transaction of approximately $1.8 million which has been deferred by the Company.
In October 2011, the three limited partnerships that own the Ohio Properties admitted two entities that are affiliates of Boston Capital (the “BC Partners”) as new limited partners as part of a syndication of LIHTCs on the Ohio Properties. The BC Partners have agreed to contribute approximately $6.7 million to the equity of these limited partnerships, subject to the Ohio Properties meeting certain debt service coverage ratios specified in the applicable limited partnership agreements. As of March 31, 2012, the Ohio Properties had not yet achieved these debt service coverage ratios and the BC Partners had not contributed a sufficient amount of additional capital to these limited partnerships to allow the Company to deconsolidate the Ohio Properties. Accordingly, the Company will continue to report each Ohio Property as an MF Property, and no gain from the 2010 sale of such Ohio Property will be recognized by the Company, until the Ohio Property achieves specified debt service coverage ratios and the BC Partners have contributed their additional capital to the limited partnership owning the Ohio Property. The Company expects that each of the Ohio Properties will achieve the debt service coverage ratios so that the BC Partners will fully fund their capital commitments during 2012. As that occurs, each Ohio Properties will cease to be reported as an MF Property and the Company will recognize the gain for the 2010 sale of the Ohio Property. After that time, the Company will report the tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds on such Ohio Property as an asset and will report the related interest income on the bond.
In connection with the BC Partners transaction, the Company entered into guarantee agreements with the BC Partners under which the Company has guaranteed certain obligations of the general partner of these limited partnerships, including an obligation to repurchase the interests of the BC Partners if certain “repurchase events” occur. A repurchase event is defined as any one of a number of events mainly focused on the completion of the property rehabilitation, property rent stabilization, the delivery of LIHTCs, tax credit recapture and foreclosure. Even if a repurchase event should occur after the $7.8 million of equity has been contributed, 25% of the BC contributed capital would remain as equity in the Ohio Properties and thus BC, a third party, would have sufficient equity in the Ohio Properties for the Company to recognize the sale discussed above.
No amount has been accrued for this contingent liability because the likelihood of a repurchase event is remote (Note 13).
The unallocated deficit of the Consolidated VIEs is primarily comprised of the accumulated historical net losses of the Consolidated VIEs since the applicable consolidation date. The unallocated deficit of the VIEs and the VIEs' net losses subsequent to that date are not allocated to the General Partner and unitholders as such activity is not contemplated by, or addressed in, the Agreement of Limited Partnership.
3. Variable Interest Entities
The Partnership invests in federally tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds which have been issued to provide construction and/or permanent financing of multifamily residential apartments. The Partnership owns 100% of these bonds and each bond is secured by a first mortgage on the property. The Partnership has also made taxable loans to the property owners in certain cases which are secured by second mortgages on these properties. Although each multifamily property financed with tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds held by the Partnership is owned by a separate entity in which the Partnership has no equity ownership interest, the debt financing provided by the Partnership creates a variable interest in these ownership entities that may require the Partnership to report the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of these entities on a consolidated basis under GAAP.
The Partnership determined that five of the entities financed by tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds owned by the Partnership were held by VIEs. These VIEs are Ashley Square, Bent Tree, Cross Creek, Fairmont Oaks, and Lake Forest. See below for further discussion on which VIEs are consolidated as of the reporting date.
At March 31, 2012, the Partnership reported three properties as Consolidated VIEs; Bent Tree, Fairmont Oaks, and Lake Forest and has continued to consolidate these entities. At March 31, 2011, the Partnership reported four properties as Consolidated VIEs: Bent Tree, Fairmont Oaks, Iona Lakes, and Lake Forest. In June 2011, the ownership of Iona Lakes became a not-for-profit entity and Iona Lakes ceased to be reported as a Consolidated VIE.
The Partnership does not hold an equity interest in these VIEs and, therefore, the assets of the VIEs cannot be used to settle the general commitments of the Partnership and the Partnership is not responsible for the commitments and liabilities of the VIEs. The primary risks to the Partnership associated with these VIEs relate to the entities ability to meet debt service obligations to the Partnership and the valuation of the underlying multifamily apartment property which serves as bond collateral.
The following is a discussion of the significant judgments and assumptions made by the Partnership in determining the primary beneficiary of the VIE and, therefore, whether the Partnership must consolidate the VIE.
Consolidated VIEs
The Partnership determined it is the primary beneficiary of the following properties at March 31, 2012: Bent Tree, Fairmont Oaks, and Lake Forest. The capital structure of each of these VIEs consists of senior debt, subordinated debt, and equity capital. The senior debt is in the form of a tax-exempt multifamily housing mortgage revenue bond and accounts for the majority of each VIE's total capital. As the bondholder, the Partnership is entitled to principal and interest payments and has certain protective rights as established by the bond documents. The equity ownership of the consolidated VIEs; Bent Tree, Fairmont Oaks, and Lake Forest, is ultimately held by corporations which are owned by four individuals, two of which are related parties. Additionally, each of these properties is managed by an affiliate of the Partnership, America First Properties Management Company, LLC (“Properties Management”) which is an affiliate of Burlington.
In determining the primary beneficiary of these VIEs, the Partnership considered the activities of the VIE which most significantly impact the VIEs' economic performance, who has the power to control such activities, the risks which the entities were designed to create, the variability associated with those risks and the interests which absorb such variability. The Partnership also considered the related party relationship of the entities involved in the VIEs. It was determined that the Partnership, as part of the related party group, met both of the primary beneficiary criteria and was the most closely associated with the VIEs and; therefore, was determined to be the primary beneficiary.
Non-Consolidated VIEs
The Company does not consolidate two VIE entities, Ashley Square and Cross Creek. In determining the primary beneficiary of these VIEs, the Partnership considered the activities of each VIE which most significantly impact the VIEs' economic performance, who has the power to control such activities, the risks which the entities were designed to create, the variability associated with those risks and the interests which absorb such variability. The significant activities of the VIE that impact the economic performance of the entity include leasing and maintaining apartments, determining if the property is to be sold, decisions relating to debt refinancing, the selection of or replacement of the property manager and the approval of the operating and capital budgets. As discussed below, while the capital structures of these VIEs resulted in the Partnership holding a majority of the variable interests in these VIEs, the Partnership determined it does not have the power to direct the activities of these VIEs that most significantly impact the VIEs’ economic performance and, as a result, is not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs.
Ashley Square – Ashley Square Housing Cooperative acquired the ownership of the Ashley Square Apartments in December 2008 from Ashley Square LLC through a warranty deed of transfer and an assumption of debt. This transfer of ownership constituted a reconsideration event as outlined in the consolidation guidance which triggered a re-evaluation of the holders of variable interests to determine the primary beneficiary of the VIE. The capital structure of the VIE consists of senior debt, subordinated loans and equity capital. The senior debt is in the form of tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds that are 100% owned by the Partnership and account for the majority of the VIE’s total capital. As the bondholder, the Partnership is entitled to principal and interest payments and has certain protective rights as established by the bond documents. The VIE is organized as a housing cooperative and the 99% equity owner of this VIE is The Foundation for Affordable Housing (“FAH”), an unaffiliated Nebraska not-for-profit organization. Additionally, this property is managed by Properties Management.
Cross Creek – Cross Creek Apartments Holdings LLC is the owner of the Cross Creek Apartments. On January 1, 2010, Cross Creek Apartment Holdings LLC entered into a new operating agreement and admitted three new members. These new members committed approximately $2.2 million of capital payable in three installments including $563,000 on January 1, 2010. The new operating agreement and admission of new owner members constituted a reconsideration event as outlined in the consolidation guidance which triggered a re-evaluation of the holders of variable interests to determine the primary beneficiary of the VIE. The capital structure of the VIE consists of senior debt, subordinated loans, and equity capital at risk. The senior debt is in the form of tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds that are 100% owned by the Partnership and account for the majority of the VIE’s total capital. As the bondholder, the Partnership is entitled to principal and interest payments and has certain protective rights as established by the bond documents. The three newly admitted members of this VIE are each unaffiliated with the Partnership and have contributed significant equity capital to the VIE. These members collectively control a 99% interest in the VIE. The other 1% member of this VIE is FAH, which is also unaffiliated with the Partnership. Additionally, this property is managed by Properties Management.
The following table presents information regarding the carrying value and classification of the assets held by the Partnership as of March 31, 2012, which constitute a variable interest in Ashley Square and Cross Creek.
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Balance Sheet Classification | | Carrying Value | | Maximum Exposure to Loss |
Ashley Square Apartments | | | | | |
Tax Exempt Mortgage Revenue Bond | Bond Investment | | $ | 5,364,748 |
| | $ | 5,296,000 |
|
Property Loan | Other Asset | | 1,190,000 |
| | 4,786,342 |
|
| | | $ | 6,554,748 |
| | $ | 10,082,342 |
|
Cross Creek Apartments | | | | | |
Tax Exempt Mortgage Revenue Bond | Bond Investment | | $ | 7,905,035 |
| | $ | 5,972,672 |
|
Property Loans | Other Asset | | 3,664,755 |
| | 3,664,755 |
|
| | | $ | 11,569,790 |
| | $ | 9,637,427 |
|
The tax exempt mortgage revenue bonds are classified on the balance sheet as available for sale investments and are carried at fair value while property loans are presented on the balance sheet as other assets and are carried at the unpaid principal and interest less any loan loss reserves. See Note 4 for additional information regarding the bonds and Note 6 for additional information regarding the property loans. The maximum exposure to loss for the bonds is equal to the unpaid principal balance as of March 31, 2012. The difference between the carrying value and the maximum exposure to loss is a function of the fair value of the bond. The maximum exposure to loss for the property loans is equal to the unpaid principal and interest. The difference between the carrying value and the maximum exposure is the value of loan loss reserves that have been previously recorded against the outstanding loan balances.
The following tables present the effects of the consolidation of the Consolidated VIEs on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Partnership as of March 31, 2012 | | Consolidated VIEs as of March 31, 2012 | | Consolidation -Elimination as of March 31, 2012 | | Total as of March 31, 2012 |
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 17,390,835 |
| | $ | 38,767 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 17,429,602 |
|
Restricted cash | | 11,913,459 |
| | 833,407 |
| | — |
| | 12,746,866 |
|
Interest receivable | | 12,985,895 |
| | — |
| | (4,712,958 | ) | | 8,272,937 |
|
Tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds held in trust, at fair value | | 135,825,458 |
| | — |
| | (23,979,480 | ) | | 111,845,978 |
|
Tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds, at fair value | | 26,730,200 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 26,730,200 |
|
Real estate assets: | | | | | | | | |
Land | | 10,093,513 |
| | 3,250,044 |
| | — |
| | 13,343,557 |
|
Buildings and improvements | | 81,180,224 |
| | 31,663,664 |
| | — |
| | 112,843,888 |
|
Real estate assets before accumulated depreciation | | 91,273,737 |
| | 34,913,708 |
| | — |
| | 126,187,445 |
|
Accumulated depreciation | | (8,383,599 | ) | | (12,679,806 | ) | | — |
| | (21,063,405 | ) |
Net real estate assets | | 82,890,138 |
| | 22,233,902 |
| | — |
| | 105,124,040 |
|
Other assets | | 19,045,160 |
| | 846,826 |
| | (10,604,505 | ) | | 9,287,481 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations | | 7,287,162 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7,287,162 |
|
Total Assets | | $ | 314,068,307 |
| | $ | 23,952,902 |
| | $ | (39,296,943 | ) | | $ | 298,724,266 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities | | $ | 2,202,088 |
| | $ | 25,146,588 |
| | $ | (24,290,146 | ) | | $ | 3,058,530 |
|
Distribution payable | | 3,803,400 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,803,400 |
|
Debt financing | | 112,537,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 112,537,000 |
|
Mortgages payable | | 41,752,135 |
| | 24,347,000 |
| | (24,347,000 | ) | | 41,752,135 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations | | 6,166,328 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,166,328 |
|
Total Liabilities | | 166,460,951 |
| | 49,493,588 |
| | (48,637,146 | ) | | 167,317,393 |
|
Partners' Capital | | | | | | | | |
General Partner | | (354,861 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (354,861 | ) |
Beneficial Unit Certificate holders | | 147,274,243 |
| | — |
| | 7,552,338 |
| | 154,826,581 |
|
Unallocated loss of Consolidated VIEs | | — |
| | (25,540,686 | ) | | 1,787,865 |
| | (23,752,821 | ) |
Total Partners' Capital | | 146,919,382 |
| | (25,540,686 | ) | | 9,340,203 |
| | 130,718,899 |
|
Noncontrolling interest | | 687,974 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 687,974 |
|
Total Capital | | 147,607,356 |
| | (25,540,686 | ) | | 9,340,203 |
| | 131,406,873 |
|
Total Liabilities and Partners' Capital | | $ | 314,068,307 |
| | $ | 23,952,902 |
| | $ | (39,296,943 | ) | | $ | 298,724,266 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Partnership as of December 31, 2011 | | Consolidated VIEs as of December 31, 2011 | | Consolidation -Elimination as of December 31, 2011 | | Total as of December 31, 2011 |
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 20,188,855 |
| | $ | 12,718 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 20,201,573 |
|
Restricted cash | | 12,915,700 |
| | 937,053 |
| | — |
| | 13,852,753 |
|
Interest receivable | | 11,395,266 |
| | — |
| | (4,410,288 | ) | | 6,984,978 |
|
Tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds held in trust, at fair value | | 132,920,723 |
| | — |
| | (23,767,936 | ) | | 109,152,787 |
|
Tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds, at fair value | | 26,542,565 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 26,542,565 |
|
Real estate assets: | | | | | | | | |
Land | | 9,180,390 |
| | 3,250,044 |
| | — |
| | 12,430,434 |
|
Buildings and improvements | | 80,045,210 |
| | 31,607,993 |
| | — |
| | 111,653,203 |
|
Real estate assets before accumulated depreciation | | 89,225,600 |
| | 34,858,037 |
| | — |
| | 124,083,637 |
|
Accumulated depreciation | | (7,485,664 | ) | | (12,332,334 | ) | | — |
| | (19,817,998 | ) |
Net real estate assets | | 81,739,936 |
| | 22,525,703 |
| | — |
| | 104,265,639 |
|
Other assets | | 19,693,928 |
| | 839,879 |
| | (10,851,419 | ) | | 9,682,388 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations | | 7,293,862 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7,293,862 |
|
Total Assets | | $ | 312,690,835 |
| | $ | 24,315,353 |
| | $ | (39,029,643 | ) | | $ | 297,976,545 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities | | $ | 2,516,851 |
| | $ | 24,780,781 |
| | $ | (23,805,990 | ) | | $ | 3,491,642 |
|
Distribution payable | | 3,911,340 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,911,340 |
|
Debt financing | | 112,673,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 112,673,000 |
|
Mortgages payable | | 40,092,455 |
| | 24,407,000 |
| | (24,407,000 | ) | | 40,092,455 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations | | 6,219,063 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,219,063 |
|
Total Liabilities | | 165,412,709 |
| | 49,187,781 |
| | (48,212,990 | ) | | 166,387,500 |
|
Partners' Capital | | | | | | | | |
General Partner | | (354,006 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (354,006 | ) |
Beneficial Unit Certificate holders | | 147,087,347 |
| | — |
| | 7,823,881 |
| | 154,911,228 |
|
Unallocated loss of Consolidated VIEs | | — |
| | (24,872,428 | ) | | 1,359,466 |
| | (23,512,962 | ) |
Total Partners' Capital | | 146,733,341 |
| | (24,872,428 | ) | | 9,183,347 |
| | 131,044,260 |
|
Noncontrolling interest | | 544,785 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 544,785 |
|
Total Capital | | 147,278,126 |
| | (24,872,428 | ) | | 9,183,347 |
| | 131,589,045 |
|
Total Liabilities and Partners' Capital | | $ | 312,690,835 |
| | $ | 24,315,353 |
| | $ | (39,029,643 | ) | | $ | 297,976,545 |
|
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Partnership For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 | | Consolidated VIEs For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 | | Consolidation -Elimination For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 | | Total For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 |
Revenues: | | | | | | | |
Property revenues | $ | 3,044,020 |
| | $ | 1,194,909 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,238,929 |
|
Mortgage revenue bond investment income | 2,753,077 |
| | — |
| | (381,673 | ) | | 2,371,404 |
|
Other income | 39,345 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 39,345 |
|
Total revenues | 5,836,442 |
| | 1,194,909 |
| | (381,673 | ) | | 6,649,678 |
|
Expenses: | | | | | | | |
Real estate operating (exclusive of items shown below) | 1,571,893 |
| | 708,041 |
| | — |
| | 2,279,934 |
|
Provision for loss on receivables | 238,175 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 238,175 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 1,093,851 |
| | 355,986 |
| | (10,932 | ) | | 1,438,905 |
|
Interest | 1,318,535 |
| | 799,142 |
| | (799,142 | ) | | 1,318,535 |
|
General and administrative | 650,579 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 650,579 |
|
Total expenses | 4,873,033 |
| | 1,863,169 |
| | (810,074 | ) | | 5,926,128 |
|
Income (loss) from operations | 963,409 |
| | (668,260 | ) | | 428,401 |
| | 723,550 |
|
Income from discontinued operations | 46,034 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 46,034 |
|
Net income (loss) | 1,009,443 |
| | (668,260 | ) | | 428,401 |
| | 769,584 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest | 139,152 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 139,152 |
|
Net income (loss) - America First Tax Exempt Investors, L. P. | $ | 870,291 |
| | $ | (668,260 | ) | | $ | 428,401 |
| | $ | 630,432 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Partnership For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 | | Consolidated VIEs For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 | | Consolidation -Elimination For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 | | Total For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 |
Revenues: | | | | | | | |
Property revenues | $ | 1,679,315 |
| | $ | 1,886,238 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,565,553 |
|
Mortgage revenue bond investment income | 2,904,674 |
| | — |
| | (683,761 | ) | | 2,220,913 |
|
Other income | 146,373 |
| | 3,416,838 |
| | (3,311,850 | ) | | 251,361 |
|
Total revenues | 4,730,362 |
| | 5,303,076 |
| | (3,995,611 | ) | | 6,037,827 |
|
Expenses: | | | | | | | |
Real estate operating (exclusive of items shown below) | 1,076,084 |
| | 1,056,124 |
| | — |
| | 2,132,208 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 601,589 |
| | 544,726 |
| | (13,256 | ) | | 1,133,059 |
|
Interest | 773,734 |
| | 1,324,298 |
| | (1,324,298 | ) | | 773,734 |
|
General and administrative | 641,595 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 641,595 |
|
Total expenses | 3,093,002 |
| | 2,925,148 |
| | (1,337,554 | ) | | 4,680,596 |
|
Income (loss) from operations | 1,637,360 |
| | 2,377,928 |
| | (2,658,057 | ) | | 1,357,231 |
|
Income from discontinued operations | 14,004 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 14,004 |
|
Net income (loss) | 1,651,364 |
| | 2,377,928 |
| | (2,658,057 | ) | | 1,371,235 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest | 182,061 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 182,061 |
|
Net income (loss) - America First Tax Exempt Investors, L. P. | 1,469,303 |
| | 2,377,928 |
| | (2,658,057 | ) | | 1,189,174 |
|
4. Investments in Tax-Exempt Bonds
The tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds owned by the Company have been issued to provide construction and/or permanent financing of multifamily residential properties and do not include the tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds issued with respect to properties owned by Consolidated VIEs or the Ohio Properties presented as MF Properties (Note 2 and Note 5). Tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds are either held directly by the Company or are held in trusts created in connection with debt financing transactions (Note 8). The Company had the following investments in tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds as of dates shown:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2012 |
Description of Tax-Exempt Mortgage Revenue Bonds | | Cost adjusted for pay-downs | | Unrealized Gain | | Unrealized Loss | | Estimated Fair Value |
Ashley Square (1) | | $ | 5,296,000 |
| | $ | 68,748 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 5,364,748 |
|
Autumn Pines (2) | | 12,291,103 |
| | 100,747 |
| | — |
| | 12,391,850 |
|
Bella Vista (1) | | 6,650,000 |
| | — |
| | (273,581 | ) | | 6,376,419 |
|
Bridle Ridge (1) | | 7,790,000 |
| | — |
| | (316,741 | ) | | 7,473,259 |
|
Brookstone (1) | | 7,442,216 |
| | 1,252,431 |
| | — |
| | 8,694,647 |
|
Cross Creek (1) | | 5,972,672 |
| | 1,932,363 |
| | — |
| | 7,905,035 |
|
GMF-Madison Tower (2) | | 3,810,000 |
| | 103,403 |
| | — |
| | 3,913,403 |
|
GMF-Warren/Tulane (2) | | 11,815,000 |
| | 320,659 |
| | — |
| | 12,135,659 |
|
Lost Creek (1) | | 16,081,625 |
| | 2,925,275 |
| | — |
| | 19,006,900 |
|
Runnymede (1) | | 10,685,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10,685,000 |
|
Southpark (1) | | 11,945,354 |
| | 1,701,846 |
| | — |
| | 13,647,200 |
|
Woodlynn Village (1) | | 4,492,000 |
| | — |
| | (240,142 | ) | | 4,251,858 |
|
Tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds held in trust | | $ | 104,270,970 |
| | $ | 8,405,472 |
| | $ | (830,464 | ) | | $ | 111,845,978 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2012 |
Description of Tax-Exempt Mortgage Revenue Bonds | | Cost adjusted for pay-downs | | Unrealized Gain | | Unrealized Loss | | Estimated Fair Value |
Iona Lakes | | $ | 15,720,000 |
| | 161,602 |
| | — |
| | $ | 15,881,602 |
|
Woodland Park | | 15,662,000 |
| | — |
| | (4,813,402 | ) | | 10,848,598 |
|
Tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds | | $ | 31,382,000 |
| | $ | 161,602 |
| | $ | (4,813,402 | ) | | $ | 26,730,200 |
|
| | | | | | |
(1) Bonds owned by ATAX TEBS I, LLC, Note 8
(2) Bond held by Deutsche Bank in a secured financing transaction, Note 8
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2011 |
Description of Tax-Exempt Mortgage Revenue Bonds | | Cost adjusted for pay-downs | | Unrealized Gains | | Unrealized Loss | | Estimated Fair Value |
Ashley Square (1) | | $ | 5,308,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 5,308,000 |
|
Autumn Pines (1) | | 12,280,776 |
| | — |
| | (152,094 | ) | | 12,128,682 |
|
Bella Vista (1) | | 6,650,000 |
| | — |
| | (405,184 | ) | | 6,244,816 |
|
Bridle Ridge (1) | | 7,815,000 |
| | — |
| | (469,056 | ) | | 7,345,944 |
|
Brookstone (1) | | 7,437,947 |
| | 1,116,538 |
| | — |
| | 8,554,485 |
|
Cross Creek (1) | | 5,961,478 |
| | 1,824,167 |
| | — |
| | 7,785,645 |
|
GMF-Madison Tower (2) | | 3,810,000 |
| | 51,130 |
| | — |
| | 3,861,130 |
|
GMF-Warren/Tulane (2) | | 11,815,000 |
| | 321,722 |
| | — |
| | 12,136,722 |
|
Lost Creek (1) | | 16,051,048 |
| | 1,962,587 |
| | — |
| | 18,013,635 |
|
Runnymede (1) | | 10,685,000 |
| | — |
| | (434,452 | ) | | 10,250,548 |
|
Southpark (1) | | 11,925,483 |
| | 1,431,637 |
| | — |
| | 13,357,120 |
|
Woodlynn Village (1) | | 4,492,000 |
| | — |
| | (325,940 | ) | | 4,166,060 |
|
Tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds held in trust | | $ | 104,231,732 |
| | $ | 6,707,781 |
| | $ | (1,786,726 | ) | | $ | 109,152,787 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2011 |
Description of Tax-Exempt Mortgage Revenue Bonds | | Cost adjusted for pay-downs | | Unrealized Gain | | Unrealized Loss | | Estimated Fair Value |
Iona Lakes | | $ | 15,720,000 |
| | $ | 160,658 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 15,880,658 |
|
Woodland Park | | 15,662,000 |
| | — |
| | (5,000,093 | ) | | 10,661,907 |
|
Tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds | | $ | 31,382,000 |
| | $ | 160,658 |
| | $ | (5,000,093 | ) | | $ | 26,542,565 |
|
(1) Bonds owned by ATAX TEBS I, LLC, Note 8
(2) Bond held by Deutsche Bank in a secured financing transaction, Note 8
Valuation - As all of the Company’s investments in tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds are classified as available-for-sale securities, they are carried on the balance sheet at their estimated fair values. Due to the limited market for the tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds, these estimates of fair value do not necessarily represent what the Company would actually receive in a sale of the bonds. There is no active trading market for the bonds and price quotes for the bonds are not generally available. As of March 31, 2012, all of the Company’s tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds were valued using discounted cash flow and yield to maturity analyses performed by management. Management’s valuation encompasses judgment in its application. The key assumption in management’s yield to maturity analysis is the range of effective yields on the individual bonds. The effective yield analysis for each bond considers the current market yield on similar bonds as well as the debt service coverage ratio of each underlying property serving as collateral for the bond. At March 31, 2012, the range of effective yields on the individual bonds was 6.0% to 8.9%. At December 31, 2011, the range of effective yields on the individual bonds was 6.3% to 9.0%. Additionally, the Company calculated the sensitivity of the key assumption used in calculating the fair values of these bonds. Assuming a 10 percent adverse change in the key assumption, the effective yields on the individual bonds would increase to a range of 6.6% to 9.7% and would result in additional unrealized losses on the bond portfolio of approximately $9.2 million. This sensitivity analysis is hypothetical and is as of a specific point in time. The results of the sensitivity analysis may not be indicative of actual changes in fair value and should be used with caution. If available, the general partner may also consider price quotes on similar bonds or other information from external sources, such as pricing services. Pricing services, broker quotes and management’s analyses provide indicative pricing only.
Unrealized gains or losses on these tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to reflect changes in their estimated fair values resulting from market conditions and fluctuations in the present value of the expected cash flows from the underlying properties. As of March 31, 2012, the following bond investments have been in an unrealized loss position for greater than twelve months; Bella Vista, Bridle Ridge, Woodlynn Village, and Woodland Park. The Company has reviewed each of its mortgage revenue bonds for impairment. Based upon this evaluation, the current unrealized losses on the bonds are considered to be temporary. Valuations of the bonds in an unrealized loss position have improved during the first three months of 2012. If the credit and capital markets would deteriorate, the Company experiences deterioration in the values of its investment portfolio, or if the Company’s intent and ability to hold certain bonds changes, the Company may incur impairments to its investment portfolio which could negatively impact the Company’s financial condition, cash flows, and reported earnings.
In February 2011, the Partnership acquired the tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond for a 100 unit multifamily apartment complex located in Montclair, California known as Briarwood Manor Apartments for approximately $4.5 million which represented 100% of the bond issuance. The bond's approximate outstanding par value is $5.5 million and earns interest at an annual rate of 5.3% with a monthly interest and principal payment and stated maturity date of June 1, 2038. Based on the purchase price discount, the bond's yield was approximately 7.0% to the Partnership. In October 2011, the Briarwood Manor bond was called and retired at par plus accrued interest for approximately $4.9 million and a gain of approximately $445,000 was recorded.
The Partnership previously identified the Woodland Park tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond for which certain actions may be necessary to protect the Partnership’s position as a secured bondholder and lender. The Company evaluated the Woodland Park bond holding for an other-than-temporary decline in value as of December 31, 2011 (see Form 10-K, Footnote 5 for discussion of our impairment testing method which remains the same). Based on this evaluation, the Company has concluded that no other-than-temporary impairment of the Woodland Park bond existed at December 31, 2011. However, the evaluation determined that the interest receivable accrued on the Woodland Park bond was impaired and an approximate $953,000 allowance for loss on receivables was recorded during fiscal year 2011. The Partnership has recorded an additional allowance for loss on receivables of approximately $238,000 against the interest receivable in the first quarter of 2012 which represents the accrued interest income on the bond for the first quarter of 2012. The Partnership continues to monitor these investments for changes in circumstances that might warrant an impairment charge. As of December 31, 2011, the property had 215 units leased out of total available units of 236, or 91% physical occupancy. As of March 31, 2012, occupancy had decreased to 205 units leased, or 87% physical occupancy and we believe this is a temporary decline and occupancy will be at or higher than 90% by December 31, 2012 which will increase the property's net operating income to be in line with what had been projected for 2012 in the most recent evaluation for other than temporary impairment.
5. Real Estate Assets
MF Properties
To facilitate its investment strategy of acquiring additional tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds secured by MF Properties, the Company has acquired through its various subsidiaries 99% limited partner positions in five limited partnerships and 100% member positions in four limited liability companies that own the MF Properties. The financial statements of these properties are consolidated with those of the Company. The general partners of these partnerships are unaffiliated parties and their 1% ownership interest in these limited partnerships is reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as noncontrolling interests. The Company expects each of these MF Properties to eventually be sold either to a not-for-profit entity or in connection with a syndication of LIHTCs. The Company expects to purchase tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds issued by the new property owners as part of the restructuring.
Recent Transactions
During the first quarter of 2012, a brokerage contract was executed to list the Churchland property for sale. This listing results in the property being reported as a discontinued operation for all periods reported. The net fixed assets of the Churchland property were approximately $6.5 million of the total $7.3 million discontinued operation total assets reported at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (Note 7).
The Partnership purchased land adjacent to DeCordova property for approximately $153,000 in 2011 and began constructing 34 additional units in 2012. The construction is expected to be completed in the fall of 2012 at which time the units will be leased as market rate units.
In February 2011, the Partnership foreclosed on the bonds secured by DeCordova and Weatherford and one of the Partnership's subsidiaries took 100% ownership interest in these limited liability companies. Both properties are reported as MF Properties. The following is a discussion of the circumstances related to the DeCordova and Weatherford properties.
Residences at DeCordova. This property is a senior (55+) affordable housing project located in Granbury, Texas in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. As of March 31, 2012, the property had 72 units leased, or 95% physical occupancy. As of December 31, 2011, the property had 76 units leased, or 100% physical occupancy. At this time, the Partnership expects to operate the property as a market rate rental property for the next six months when it will evaluate its options in order to recoup its investment.
Residences at Weatherford. Residences at Weatherford are currently under construction and will contain 76 units upon completion. This property is a senior (55+) affordable housing project located in Weatherford, Texas in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. The construction of this property has been 99% completed and lease up has begun. The Partnership expects to operate the property as a market rate property and will evaluate its options in order to recoup its investment.
In July 2011, the Company obtained a $6.5 million construction loan secured by the DeCordova and Weatherford properties. This construction loan will be used to fund the completion of Weatherford and the planned future expansion of DeCordova. The construction loan is with an unrelated third party and carries a fixed annual interest rate of 5.9%, maturing on July 28, 2015. The balance of this note at March 31, 2012 is $6.3 million. This agreement requires $500,000 to be held by the Company as restricted cash.
Acquisitions
In the third quarter of 2010, the Company purchased a minority interest equal to 8.7% ownership in 810 Schutte Road LLC ("Eagle Village"), a 511 bed student housing facility located in Evansville, Indiana. The minority interest investment totaled approximately $1.1 million and was presented in other assets. In June 2011, the Partnership acquired the remaining ownership interest in Eagle Village. Approximately $3.1 million of cash on hand plus a conventional mortgage of approximately $8.9 million was used to purchase the remaining ownership. The mortgage loan carries a variable interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 2.75% but will not be less than 3.5%. On March 31, 2012 this rate was 3.5%. This mortgage matures on June 1, 2013. Eagle Village returned $125,000 to the Company as a preferred return on their investment . The transaction is eliminated upon consolidation. Eagle Village is wholly owned by a subsidiary of the Partnership and was reported as an MF Property. The Partnership plans to operate the property as a student housing facility. Once stabilized as a student housing property, the Company will seek to restructure the ownership and capital structure through the sale of the property to a student housing not-for-profit entity. The Company anticipates it will purchase tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds issued as part of the restructuring.
In March 2011, the Partnership purchased The Arboretum on Farnam Drive ("Arboretum"), a 145 unit independent senior living facility located in Omaha, Nebraska, for approximately $20.0 million plus transaction expenses of approximately $449,000. The purchase price was funded through a conventional mortgage of $17.5 million and cash on hand. The mortgage payable is with Omaha State Bank, carries a 5.25% fixed rate and matures on March 31, 2014. The Partnership intends to restructure the property operations by shifting from an entrance fee rental income model utilized by the prior ownership to a current market rent model. Upon lease-up and stabilization of the property, projected to occur within the next 12 months, the Partnership expects to sell the property to a 501(c)3 not-for-profit entity and acquire tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds collateralized by the property.
Individually these acquisitions are not material but in the aggregate they must be disclosed pursuant to the business combinations guidance. A condensed balance sheet at the date of acquisition for each of the 2011 acquisitions is included below.
|
| | | | |
| | Eagle Village 6/29/2011 (Date of acquisition) |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 244,923 |
|
Restricted cash | | 589,493 |
|
Other current assets | | 46,380 |
|
In-place lease assets | | 96,829 |
|
Real estate assets | | 12,383,605 |
|
Finance costs | | 108,060 |
|
Total assets | | $ | 13,469,290 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other | | $ | 278,230 |
|
Mortgage payable | | 8,925,000 |
|
Stockholders' equity | | 4,266,060 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | | $ | 13,469,290 |
|
| | |
| | Arboretum 3/31/2011 (Date of acquisition) |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 186,575 |
|
Restricted cash | | 429,231 |
|
Other current assets | | 116,631 |
|
Real estate assets | | 20,031,050 |
|
Finance costs | | 181,565 |
|
Total assets | | $ | 20,945,052 |
|
Mortgage payable | | $ | 17,500,000 |
|
Stockholders' equity | | 3,445,052 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | | $ | 20,945,052 |
|
The table below shows the pro forma condensed consolidated results of operations of the Company as if the Eagle Village and Arboretum properties had been acquired at the beginning of the periods presented:
|
| | | | | | | |
| For the three months ended March 31, 2011 | | For the year ended December 31, 2011 |
| | | |
Revenues | $ | 6,923,484 |
| | $ | 28,841,546 |
|
Net income | 1,309,234 |
| | (2,162,401 | ) |
Net income allocated to unitholders | 1,574,670 |
| | (1,025,221 | ) |
Unitholders' interest in net income (loss) per unit (basic and diluted) | $ | 0.05 |
| | $ | (0.03 | ) |
The Company had the following investments in MF Properties as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MF Properties |
Property Name | | Location | | Number of Units | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Carrying Value at March 31, 2012 |
Arboretum | | Omaha, NE | | 145 |
| | $ | 1,720,740 |
| | $ | 18,737,356 |
| | $ | 20,458,096 |
|
Eagle Ridge | | Erlanger, KY | | 64 |
| | 290,763 |
| | 2,487,654 |
| | 2,778,417 |
|
Eagle Village | | Evansville, IN | | 511 |
| | 564,726 |
| | 12,237,122 |
| | 12,801,848 |
|
Meadowview | | Highland Heights, KY | | 118 |
| | 688,539 |
| | 5,098,610 |
| | 5,787,149 |
|
Glynn Place | | Brunswick, GA | | 128 |
| | 743,996 |
| | 4,682,385 |
| | 5,426,381 |
|
Greens of Pine Glen | | Durham, NC | | 168 |
| | 604,497 |
| | 6,408,488 |
| | 7,012,985 |
|
Residences of DeCordova | | Granbury, TX | | 76 |
| | 678,852 |
| | 5,286,063 |
| | 5,964,915 |
|
Residences of Weatherford | | Weatherford, TX | | 76 |
| | 533,000 |
| | 6,758,697 |
| | 7,291,697 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | 67,521,488 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation (depreciation expense of approximately $660,000 in 2012) | | (5,187,105 | ) |
Balance at March 31, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | $ | 62,334,383 |
|
MF Properties Subject to Sales Agreement |
Property Name | | Location | | Number of Units | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Carrying Value at March 31, 2012 |
Crescent Village | | Cincinnati, OH | | 90 |
| | $ | 353,117 |
| | $ | 6,238,824 |
| | $ | 6,591,941 |
|
Willow Bend | | Hilliard, OH | | 92 |
| | 580,130 |
| | 5,019,621 |
| | 5,599,751 |
|
Postwoods | | Reynoldsburg, OH | | 180 |
| | 1,148,504 |
| | 10,412,053 |
| | 11,560,557 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | 23,752,249 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation (depreciation expense of approximately $238,000 in 2012) | | (3,196,494 | ) |
Balance at March 31, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | $ | 20,555,755 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MF Properties |
Property Name | | Location | | Number of Units | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Carrying Value at December 31, 2011 |
Arboretum | | Omaha, NE | | 145 |
| | $ | 1,720,740 |
| | $ | 18,730,388 |
| | $ | 20,451,128 |
|
Eagle Ridge | | Erlanger, KY | | 64 |
| | 290,763 |
| | 2,485,433 |
| | 2,776,196 |
|
Eagle Village | | Evansville, IN | | 511 |
| | 564,726 |
| | 12,230,322 |
| | 12,795,048 |
|
Meadowview | | Highland Heights, KY | | 118 |
| | 688,539 |
| | 5,082,090 |
| | 5,770,629 |
|
Glynn Place | | Brunswick, GA | | 128 |
| | 743,996 |
| | 4,677,793 |
| | 5,421,789 |
|
Greens of Pine Glen | | Durham, NC | | 168 |
| | 1,744,761 |
| | 5,256,692 |
| | 7,001,453 |
|
Residences of DeCordova | | Granbury, TX | | 76 |
| | 679,495 |
| | 4,960,461 |
| | 5,639,956 |
|
Residences of Weatherford | | Weatherford, TX | | 76 |
| | 533,000 |
| | 5,105,278 |
| | 5,638,278 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | 65,494,477 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation (depreciation expense of approximately $2.3 million in 2011) | | | | (4,527,400 | ) |
Balance at December 31, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | $ | 60,967,077 |
|
MF Properties Subject to Sales Agreement |
Property Name | | Location | | Number of Units | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Carrying Value at December 31, 2011 |
Crescent Village | | Cincinnati, OH | | 90 |
| | $ | 353,117 |
| | $ | 6,238,827 |
| | $ | 6,591,944 |
|
Willow Bend | | Hilliard, OH | | 92 |
| | 580,130 |
| | 5,008,793 |
| | 5,588,923 |
|
Postwoods | | Reynoldsburg, OH | | 180 |
| | 1,148,504 |
| | 10,401,752 |
| | 11,550,256 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | 23,731,123 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation (depreciation expense of approximately $829,000 in 2011) | | | | (2,958,263 | ) |
Balance at December 31, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | $ | 20,772,860 |
|
In June 2010, the Company completed a sales transaction whereby four of the MF Properties were sold to three new ownership entities controlled by an unaffiliated not-for-profit entity. As the buyer has no equity capital in this transaction and the property operations are the current support for the debt service, the Company, in substance, remains the owner for accounting purposes. As such, the Company will continue to consolidate the Ohio Properties as if the sale was not completed. The properties will continue to be presented as MF Properties and no gain will be recognized until such time as the transaction meets the criteria for derecognition of the properties and gain recognition can be accounted for as a sale (Note 2).
Consolidated VIE Properties
In addition to the MF Properties, the Company consolidates the assets, liabilities and results of operations of the Consolidated VIEs in accordance with the accounting guidance on consolidations. Although the assets of these VIEs are consolidated, the Company has no ownership interest in the VIEs other than to the extent they serve as collateral for the tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds owned by the Partnership. The results of operations of those properties are recorded by the Company in consolidation but any net income or loss from these properties does not accrue to the unitholders or the general partner, but is instead included in "Unallocated deficit of Consolidated VIEs.”
The Company consolidated the following properties owned by Consolidated VIEs in continuing operations as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated VIEs |
Property Name | | Location | | Number of Units | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Carrying Value at March 31, 2012 |
Bent Tree Apartments | | Columbia, SC | | 232 |
| | $ | 986,000 |
| | $ | 11,780,563 |
| | $ | 12,766,563 |
|
Fairmont Oaks Apartments | | Gainsville, FL | | 178 |
| | 850,400 |
| | 8,628,046 |
| | 9,478,446 |
|
Lake Forest Apartments | | Daytona Beach, FL | | 240 |
| | 1,396,800 |
| | 11,271,899 |
| | 12,668,699 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | 34,913,708 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation (depreciation expense of approximately $347,000 in 2012) | | (12,679,806 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 22,233,902 |
|
Consolidated VIEs |
Property Name | | Location | | Number of Units | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Carrying Value at December 31, 2011 |
Bent Tree Apartments | | Columbia, SC | | 232 |
| | $ | 986,000 |
| | $ | 11,758,519 |
| | $ | 12,744,519 |
|
Fairmont Oaks Apartments | | Gainsville, FL | | 178 |
| | 850,400 |
| | 8,615,014 |
| | 9,465,414 |
|
Lake Forest Apartments | | Daytona Beach, FL | | 240 |
| | 1,396,800 |
| | 11,251,304 |
| | 12,648,104 |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | 34,858,037 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation (depreciation expense of approximately $1.7 million in 2011) | | | | (12,332,334 | ) |
Balance at December 31, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | $ | 22,525,703 |
|
6. Other Assets
The Company had the following Other Assets as of dates shown:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 |
Property loans receivable | | $ | 19,973,803 |
| | $ | 19,808,803 |
|
Less: Loan loss reserves | | (17,102,352 | ) | | (16,782,918 | ) |
Deferred financing costs - net | | 3,763,626 |
| | 3,894,071 |
|
Fair value of derivative contracts | | 993,930 |
| | 1,323,270 |
|
Taxable bonds at fair market value | | 780,634 |
| | 774,946 |
|
Other assets | | 877,840 |
| | 664,216 |
|
Total Other Assets | | $ | 9,287,481 |
| | $ | 9,682,388 |
|
In addition to the tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds held by the Company, taxable property loans have been made to the owners of the properties which secure the bonds and are reported as Other Assets, net of loan loss reserves. The Company periodically, or as changes in circumstances or operations dictate, evaluates such taxable loans for impairment. The value of the underlying property assets is ultimately the most relevant measure of value to support the taxable loan values. The Company utilizes a discounted cash flow model in estimating a property fair value. Discounted cash flow models containing varying assumptions are considered. The various models may assume multiple revenue and expense scenarios, various capitalization rates and multiple discount rates. Other information, such as independent appraisals, may be considered in estimating a property fair value. If the estimated fair value of the property after deducting the amortized cost basis of any senior tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond exceeds the principal balance of the property loan then no potential loss is indicated and no allowance for property loans is needed. In estimating the property valuation, the most significant assumptions utilized in the discounted cash flow model remained the same as discussed in the Form 10-K and include revenue and expense projections and capitalization rates.
During the first quarter of 2012, the Partnership advanced additional funds to Cross Creek and Iona Lakes of approximately $100,000 and $65,000, respectively. During the first quarter of 2012, the Partnership recorded loan loss reserves equal to the accrued interest on the Ashley Square, Cross Creek, Iona Lakes and Woodland Park property loans.
The following is a summary of the taxable loans, accrued interest and allowance on the amounts due at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2012 |
| | Outstanding Balance | | Accrued Interest | | Loan Loss Reserves | | Net Taxable Loans |
Ashley Square | | $ | 4,786,342 |
| | $ | 1,398,866 |
| | $ | (4,995,208 | ) | | $ | 1,190,000 |
|
Cross Creek | | 6,869,227 |
| | 1,424,053 |
| | (4,628,525 | ) | | 3,664,755 |
|
Iona Lakes | | 7,404,118 |
| | 2,363,135 |
| | (6,364,757 | ) | | 3,402,496 |
|
Woodland Park | | 914,116 |
| | 199,746 |
| | (1,113,862 | ) | | — |
|
| | $ | 19,973,803 |
| | $ | 5,385,800 |
| | $ | (17,102,352 | ) | | $ | 8,257,251 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2011 |
| | Outstanding Balance | | Accrued Interest | | Loan Loss Reserves | | Net Taxable Loans |
Ashley Square | | $ | 4,786,342 |
| | $ | 1,331,186 |
| | $ | (4,927,528 | ) | | $ | 1,190,000 |
|
Cross Creek | | 6,769,227 |
| | 1,360,270 |
| | (4,564,742 | ) | | 3,564,755 |
|
Iona Lakes | | 7,339,118 |
| | 2,207,301 |
| | (6,208,923 | ) | | 3,337,496 |
|
Woodland Park | | 914,116 |
| | 167,609 |
| | (1,081,725 | ) | | — |
|
| | $ | 19,808,803 |
| | $ | 5,066,366 |
| | $ | (16,782,918 | ) | | $ | 8,092,251 |
|
The following is a detail of loan loss reserves for the three months and year ended March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 |
Balance, beginning of period | | $ | 16,782,918 |
| | $ | 9,899,719 |
|
Provision for loan loss | | — |
| | 4,242,571 |
|
Deconsolidation of VIEs | | — |
| | 1,861,051 |
|
Accrued interest not recognized | | 319,434 |
| | 779,577 |
|
Balance, end of period | | $ | 17,102,352 |
| | $ | 16,782,918 |
|
Accrued interest not recognized represents interest accrued that the Partnership has determined they are not reasonably assured of collecting. During first quarter 2012 and the year ended 2011, the Partnership recorded an allowance for accrued interest not recognized on Ashley Square, Cross Creek, Iona Lakes, and Woodland Park taxable loans.
7. Discontinued Operations
On March 1, 2012, a brokerage contract was executed to list the Churchland property for sale. As a result, this MF Property met the criteria for discontinued operations presentation and has been classified as such in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. The proceeds from the sale are expected to be more than the carrying value of the property's assets and the sale is expected to be completed before the end of 2012.
The following represents the components of the assets and liabilities of discontinued operations:
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2012 |
| | December 31, 2011 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 9,431 |
| | $ | 11,840 |
|
Restricted cash | 69,296 |
| | 52,615 |
|
Land | 1,171,146 |
| | 1,171,146 |
|
Buildings and improvements | 6,394,165 |
| | 6,389,200 |
|
Real estate assets before accumulated depreciation | 7,565,311 |
| | 7,560,346 |
|
Accumulated depreciation | (1,076,053 | ) | | (1,022,197 | ) |
Net real estate assets | 6,489,258 |
| | 6,538,149 |
|
Other assets | 719,177 |
| | 691,258 |
|
Total assets from discontinued operations | 7,287,162 |
| | 7,293,862 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 51,294 |
| | 67,634 |
|
Mortgage payable | 6,115,034 |
| | 6,151,429 |
|
Total liabilities from discontinued operations | 6,166,328 |
| | 6,219,063 |
|
Net deficits of discontinued operations | $ | 1,120,834 |
| | $ | 1,074,799 |
|
The following presents the revenues, expenses and income from discontinued operations:
|
| | | | | | | |
| For three months ended March 31, |
| 2012 | | 2011 |
Rental revenues | $ | 279,104 |
| | $ | 265,020 |
|
Expenses | 233,070 |
| | 251,016 |
|
Income from discontinued operations | $ | 46,034 |
| | $ | 14,004 |
|
8. Debt Financing
The Company currently has outstanding debt financing of $112.5 million under separate credit facilities.
Tender Option Bond Financings
In July 2011, the Company closed a $10.0 million financing utilizing a Tender Option Bond ("TOB") structure with the Deutsche Bank ("DB"). The first TOB was structured as a securitization of the Company's $13.4 million Autumn Pines Apartments tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond. In December 2011, the Company closed a second TOB financing structure in the amount of $7.8 million with DB. The second TOB was structured as a securitization of the Company's $15.6 million GMF-Warren/Tulane Apartments and GMF-Madison apartments tax-exempt mortgage revenue and taxable mortgage revenue bonds. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company owed $17.7 million on both TOB facilities. Under the TOB structure, the Company transferred the bonds to a custodian and trustee that provide these services on behalf of DB. The TOB trustee then issued senior floating-rate participation interests ("SPEARS"), and residual participation interests, ("LIFERS"). The SPEARS and LIFERS represent beneficial interests in the securitized asset held by the TOB trustee. The SPEARS were credit-enhanced by DB and sold through a placement agent to unaffiliated investors. The gross proceeds from the sale of the SPEARS were remitted to the Company. The LIFERS were retained by the Company and are pledged to DB to secure certain reimbursement obligations.
As a result, the TOB trusts essentially provide the Company with a secured variable rate debt facility at interest rates that reflect the prevailing short-term tax-exempt rates paid by the TOB trusts on the SPEARS. Payments made to the holders of the SPEARS and the amount of trust fees essentially represent the Company's effective cost of borrowing on the net proceeds it received from the sale of the SPEARS and are expected to vary over time. The total fixed trust fees are 1.77% and 2.10% per annum, respectively, and as of March 31, 2012 the rates paid on the TOBs on the SPEARS were .28% and .26% per annum, resulting in a total cost of borrowing of 2.05% and 2.36%, respectively. The Company is accounting for these transactions as secured financing arrangements.
Tax Exempt Bond Securitization Financing ("TEBS")
As of September 1, 2010, the Partnership and its Consolidated Subsidiary ATAX TEBS I, LLC, entered into a number of agreements relating to a new long-term debt financing facility provided through the securitization of 13 tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds owned by the ATAX TEBS I, LLC (the “Sponsor”) pursuant to the TEBS Financing. The TEBS Financing essentially provides the Partnership with a long-term variable-rate debt facility at interest rates reflecting prevailing short-term tax-exempt rates.
Effective September 1, 2010, the Partnership transferred the following bonds to ATAX TEBS I, LLC, a special purpose entity controlled by the Partnership pursuant to the TEBS Financing. The par value of the bonds included in this Financing facility as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Description of Tax-Exempt | | Outstanding Bond Par Amounts |
Mortgage Revenue Bonds | | March 31, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 | | Financial Statement Presentation |
Ashley Square | | $ | 5,296,000 |
| | $ | 5,308,000 |
| | Tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond |
Bella Vista | | 6,650,000 |
| | 6,650,000 |
| | Tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond |
Bent Tree | | 7,668,000 |
| | 7,686,000 |
| | Consolidated VIE |
Bridle Ridge | | 7,790,000 |
| | 7,815,000 |
| | Tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond |
Brookstone | | 9,472,684 |
| | 9,490,809 |
| | Tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond |
Cross Creek | | 8,618,501 |
| | 8,634,693 |
| | Tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond |
Fairmont Oaks | | 7,502,000 |
| | 7,520,000 |
| | Consolidated VIE |
Lake Forest | | 9,177,000 |
| | 9,201,000 |
| | Consolidated VIE |
Runnymede | | 10,685,000 |
| | 10,685,000 |
| | Tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond |
Southpark | | 14,000,000 |
| | 14,000,000 |
| | Tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond |
Woodlynn Village | | 4,492,000 |
| | 4,492,000 |
| | Tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond |
Ohio Series A Bond (1) | | 14,645,000 |
| | 14,666,000 |
| | Consolidated MF Property |
Villages at Lost Creek | | 18,500,000 |
| | 18,500,000 |
| | Tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond |
Total | | $ | 124,496,185 |
| | $ | 124,648,502 |
| | |
(1) Collateralized by Crescent Village, Postwoods and Willow Bend (Note 2)
The securitization of these assets occurred through two classes of certificates. The Class A TEBS Certificates were issued in an initial principal amount of $95.8 million and were sold through a placement agent to unaffiliated investors. The Class B TEBS Certificates were issued in an initial principal amount of $20.3 million and were retained by the Sponsor. The holders of the Class A TEBS Certificates are entitled to receive regular payments of interest from Freddie Mac at a variable rate which resets periodically based on the weekly Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (“SIFMA”) floating index rate plus certain credit, facility, remarketing and servicing fees (the “Facility Fees”). The total Facility Fees are 1.9%, and as of March 31, 2012, the SIFMA rate was equal to 0.24% resulting in a total cost of borrowing of 2.14% on the outstanding balance on the TEBS Financing facility of $94.8 million. The TEBS Financing and the associated TEBS Trust are presented as secured financings within the consolidated financial statements.
The term of the TEBS Financing coincides with the terms of the assets securing the TEBS Certificates, except that the Partnership may terminate the TEBS Financing at its option on either September 15, 2017 or September 15, 2020. Should the Partnership not elect to terminate the TEBS Financing on these dates, the full term of the TEBS Financing runs through the final principal payment date associated with the securitized bonds, or July 15, 2050.
The Company's TOB facilities mature in December 2012. The Company is looking at extending or refinancing the facilities and expects to execute on one of those alternatives before the facilities come due. The Company’s Debt Financing as of March 31, 2012, contractually matures over the next five years and thereafter as follows:
|
| | | | |
2012 | | $ | 18,549,000 |
|
2013 | | 1,009,000 |
|
2014 | | 1,083,000 |
|
2015 | | 1,139,000 |
|
2016 | | 1,192,000 |
|
Thereafter | | 89,565,000 |
|
Total | | $ | 112,537,000 |
|
9. Mortgages Payable
The Company reports the mortgage loans secured by certain MF Properties on its consolidated financial statements as Mortgages payable. As of March 31, 2012, outstanding mortgage loans totaled approximately $41.8 million. As of December 31, 2011, outstanding mortgage loans totaled approximately $40.1 million.
In February 2012, the Partnership obtained a $2.0 million construction loan secured by the DeCordova property to be used to expand the DeCordova campus by constructing a new apartment building adjacent to the existing DeCordova property. This construction loan is with an unrelated third party and carries a fixed annual interest rate of 5.0%, maturing on February 1, 2017.
In March 2011, the Company purchased Arboretum, an independent senior living facility in Omaha, Nebraska. A portion of the purchase price was financed with approximately $17.5 million mortgage payable. This mortgage carries a 5.25% fixed rate and matures on March 31, 2014.
The Company’s mortgages payable as of March 31, 2012 contractually mature over the next five years and thereafter as follows:
|
| | | | |
2012 | | $ | 4,294,560 |
|
2013 | | 8,925,000 |
|
2014 | | 22,128,000 |
|
2015 | | 6,265,080 |
|
2016 | | — |
|
Thereafter | | 139,494 |
|
Total | | $ | 41,752,135 |
|
10. Transactions with Related Parties
The general partner of the Partnership, AFCA 2, is entitled to receive an administrative fee from the Partnership equal to 0.45% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of any of its tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds, taxable loans collateralized by real property, and other tax-exempt investments for which the owner of the financed property or other third party is not obligated to pay such administrative fee directly to AFCA 2. For the quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Partnership paid administrative fees to AFCA 2 of approximately $194,000 and $201,000, respectively. In addition to the administrative fees paid directly by the Partnership, AFCA 2 receives administrative fees directly from the owners of properties financed by certain of the tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds held by the Partnership. These administrative fees also equal 0.45% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of these tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds and totaled approximately $33,000 and $46,000 for the quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
AFCA 2 earned mortgage placement fees in connection with the acquisition of certain tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds. These mortgage placement fees were paid by the owners of the respective properties and, accordingly, have not been reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements because these properties are not considered VIEs. During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, AFCA 2 earned mortgage placement fees of approximately $0 and $243,000, respectively.
An affiliate of AFCA 2, America First Properties Management Company, LLC (“Properties Management”), provides property management services for Arboretum, Ashley Square Apartments, Iona Lakes Apartments, Bent Tree Apartments, Lake Forest Apartments, Fairmont Oaks Apartments, Cross Creek, Woodland Park, Residences at DeCordova, Eagle Ridge, Eagle Village, Crescent Village, Meadowview, Willow Bend, Postwoods, Churchland, Glynn Place and Greens of Pine Glen, earning management fees of approximately $291,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012, Properties Management provided property management services for Ashley Square Apartments, Iona Lakes Apartments, Bent Tree Apartments, Lake Forest Apartments, Fairmont Oaks Apartments, Cross Creek, Clarkson College, Woodland Park, Residences at DeCordova, Eagle Ridge, Crescent Village, Meadowview, Willow Bend, Postwoods, Churchland, Glynn Place and Greens of Pine Glen and earned management fees of approximately $255,500 for the quarter ended March 31, 2011. These property management fees are not Partnership expenses, but are paid in each case by the owner of the multifamily apartment property. However, for properties owned by entities treated as Consolidated VIEs and for MF Properties, the property management fees are reflected as real estate operating expenses on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The property management fees are paid out of the revenues generated by all properties financed by tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds and taxable mortgages prior to the payment of debt service on the Partnership’s tax-exempt revenue bonds and taxable loans. At March 31, 2012, the Company had a receivable of $200,000 from America First Properties Management Company, LLC recorded as an other asset.
Two of the owners of the limited-purpose corporations which own three of the Consolidated VIEs held by the Company are employees of Burlington who are not involved in the operation or management of the Company and who are not executive officers or managers of Burlington.
11. Interest Rate Derivative Agreements
As of March 31, 2012, the Company has three derivative agreements in order to mitigate its exposure to increases in interest rates on its variable-rate debt financing and mortgages payable. The terms of the derivative agreements are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Date Purchased | | Notional Amount | | Effective Capped Rate | | Maturity Date | | Purchase Price | | Counterparty |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| September 2, 2010 | | $ | 31,936,667 |
| | 3.00 | % | | September 1, 2017 | | $ | 921,000 |
| | Bank of New York Mellon |
| | | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | |
| September 2, 2010 | | $ | 31,936,667 |
| | 3.00 | % | | September 1, 2017 | | $ | 845,600 |
| | Barclays Bank PLC |
| | | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | |
| September 2, 2010 | | $ | 31,936,667 |
| | 3.00 | % | | September 1, 2017 | | $ | 928,000 |
| | Royal Bank of Canada |
These interest rate derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting and, accordingly, they are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value included in current period earnings within interest expense. The change in the fair value of these derivative contracts resulted in an increase in interest expense of approximately $329,000 and $233,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
12. Segment Reporting
The Company consists of three reportable segments, Tax-Exempt Bond Investments, MF Properties, and Consolidated VIEs. In addition to the three reportable segments, the Company also separately reports its consolidation and elimination information because it does not allocate certain items to the segments.
Tax-Exempt Bond Investments Segment
The Tax-Exempt Bond Investments segment consists of the Company’s portfolio of federally tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds which have been issued to provide construction and/or permanent financing of multifamily residential apartments. Such tax-exempt bonds are held as long-term investments. As of March 31, 2012, the Company held seventeen tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds not associated with Consolidated VIEs and three tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds associated with Consolidated VIEs which are bonds that are eliminated in consolidation on the Company's financial statements. Additionally, two of the seventeen tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds are secured by the three Ohio Properties subject to a sales agreement (Note 2). These bonds are eliminated in consolidation and presented as MF properties within the Company's financial statements. The multifamily apartment properties financed by the 20 tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds contain a total of 3,959 rental units.
MF Properties Segment
The MF Properties segment consists of indirect equity interests in twelve multifamily apartment properties which are not currently financed by tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds held by the Partnership but which the Partnership eventually intends to finance by such bonds through a restructuring. In connection with any such restructuring, the Partnership will be required to dispose of any equity interest held in such MF Properties. Other than the Churchland property, the Partnership's interests in its current MF Properties are not currently classified as Assets Held for Sale because the Partnership is not actively marketing them for sale, there is no definitive purchase agreement in existence that, under current guidance, can be recognized as a sale of real estate assets and, therefore, no sale is expected in the next twelve months. The Ohio Properties are subject to a sales agreement and will continue to be reported as MF Properties until they meet the criteria for recognition of their sale as discussed in Note 2. During the time the Partnership holds an interest in an MF Property, any net rental income generated by the MF Properties in excess of debt service will be available for distribution to the Partnership in accordance with its interest in the MF Property. Any such cash distribution will contribute to the Partnership’s Cash Available for Distribution (“CAD”). As of March 31, 2012, the Company held an interest in nine MF Properties containing a total of 1,410 rental units (including the Chuchland property reported as an asset held for sale) and three MF Properties subject to a sales agreement containing a total of 362 rental units.
The Consolidated VIE Segment
The Consolidated VIE segment consists of multifamily apartment properties which are financed with tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds held by the Partnership, the assets, liabilities and operating results of which are consolidated with those of the Partnership as a result of consolidation guidance. The tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds on these Consolidated VIE properties are eliminated from the Company’s financial statements as a result of such consolidation, however, such bonds are held as long-term investments by the Partnership which continues to be entitled to receive principal and interest payments on such bonds. The Company does not actually own an equity position in the Consolidated VIEs or their underlying properties. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company consolidated three VIEs containing a total of 650 rental units. At March 31, 2011, the Company consolidated four VIEs containing 1,000 rental units.
Management’s goals with respect to the properties constituting each of the Company’s reportable segments is to generate increasing amounts of net rental income from these properties that will allow them to (i) make all payments of base interest, and possibly pay contingent interest, on the properties included in the Tax-Exempt Bond Investments segment and the Consolidated VIE segment, and (ii) distribute net rental income to the Partnership from the MF Properties segment until such properties can be refinanced with additional tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds meeting the Partnership’s investment criteria. In order to achieve these goals, management of these multifamily apartment properties is focused on: (i) maintaining high economic occupancy and increasing rental rates through effective leasing, reduced turnover rates and providing quality maintenance and services to maximize resident satisfaction; (ii) managing operating expenses and achieving cost reductions through operating efficiencies and economies of scale generally inherent in the management of a portfolio of multiple properties; and (iii) emphasizing regular programs of repairs, maintenance and property improvements to enhance the competitive advantage and value of its properties in their respective market areas. In that regard, management closely monitors and evaluates the operational and financial results of all properties financed by the Partnership’s Tax-Exempt Bond Investments and the MF Properties.
The following table details certain key financial information for the Company’s reportable segments for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 and as of December 31, 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended |
| | March 31, 2012 | | March 31, 2011 |
Total revenue | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Bond Investments | | $ | 2,792,422 |
| | $ | 3,051,047 |
|
MF Properties | | 3,044,020 |
| | 1,679,315 |
|
Consolidated VIEs | | 1,194,909 |
| | 5,303,076 |
|
Consolidation/eliminations | | (381,673 | ) | | (3,995,611 | ) |
Total revenue | | $ | 6,649,678 |
| | $ | 6,037,827 |
|
| | | | |
Interest expense | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Bond Investments | | $ | 907,521 |
| | $ | 748,330 |
|
MF Properties | | 411,014 |
| | 25,404 |
|
Consolidated VIEs | | 799,142 |
| | 1,324,298 |
|
Consolidation/eliminations | | (799,142 | ) | | (1,324,298 | ) |
Total interest expense | | $ | 1,318,535 |
| | $ | 773,734 |
|
| | | | |
Depreciation expense | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Bond Investments | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
MF Properties | | 897,936 |
| | 451,840 |
|
Consolidated VIEs | | 347,472 |
| | 533,475 |
|
Consolidation/eliminations | | — |
| | — |
|
Total depreciation expense | | $ | 1,245,408 |
| | $ | 985,315 |
|
| | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Bond Investments | | $ | 853,001 |
| | $ | 1,513,843 |
|
MF Properties | | 110,408 |
| | 123,517 |
|
Consolidated VIEs | | (668,260 | ) | | 2,377,928 |
|
Consolidation/eliminations | | 428,401 |
| | (2,658,057 | ) |
Net income from continuing operations | | $ | 723,550 |
| | $ | 1,357,231 |
|
| | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Bond Investments | | $ | 853,001 |
| | $ | 1,513,843 |
|
MF Properties | | 17,290 |
| | 137,521 |
|
Consolidated VIEs | | (668,260 | ) | | 2,377,928 |
|
Consolidation/eliminations | | 428,401 |
| | (2,658,057 | ) |
Net income - America First Tax Exempt Investors, L. P. | | $ | 630,432 |
| | $ | 1,371,235 |
|
| | | | |
| | March 31, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 |
Total assets | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Bond Investments | | $ | 321,409,835 |
| | $ | 321,433,013 |
|
MF Properties | | 81,762,676 |
| | 81,421,532 |
|
Consolidated VIEs | | 23,952,902 |
| | 24,315,353 |
|
Consolidation/eliminations | | (128,401,147 | ) | | (129,193,353 | ) |
Total assets | | $ | 298,724,266 |
| | $ | 297,976,545 |
|
| | | | |
Total partners' capital | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Bond Investments | | $ | 178,814,680 |
| | $ | 179,285,257 |
|
MF Properties | | 2,580,020 |
| | 2,279,639 |
|
Consolidated VIEs | | (25,540,686 | ) | | (24,872,428 | ) |
Consolidation/eliminations | | (25,135,115 | ) | | (25,648,208 | ) |
Total partners' capital | | $ | 130,718,899 |
| | $ | 131,044,260 |
|
13. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company, from time to time, may be subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. These matters are frequently covered by insurance. If it has been determined that a loss is probable to occur, the estimated amount of the loss is accrued in the consolidated financial statements. While the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes the final outcome of such matters will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
As the holder of residual interests issued in connection with its TEBS and TOB bond financing arrangements, the Partnership is required to guarantee certain losses that can be incurred by the trusts created in connection with these financings. These guarantees may result from a downgrade in the investment rating of tax-exempt bonds held by the trust or of the senior securities issued by the trust, a ratings downgrade of the liquidity provider for the trust, increases in short term interest rates beyond pre-set maximums, an inability to re-market the senior securities or an inability to obtain liquidity for the trust. In each of these cases, the trust will be collapsed. If the proceeds from the sale of the trust collateral are not sufficient to pay the principal amount of the senior securities with accrued interest and the other expenses of the trusts, the Partnership will be required to fund any such shortfall pursuant to its guarantee.
Certain of the MF Properties own apartment properties that generated LIHTCs for the previous partners in these partnerships. In connection with the acquisition of partnership interests in these partnerships by subsidiaries of the Company, the Company has agreed to reimburse the prior partners for any liabilities they incur due to recapture of these tax credits to the extent the recapture liability is due to the operation of the properties in a manner inconsistent with the laws and regulations relating to such tax credits after the date of acquisition. No amount has been accrued for this contingent liability because management believes that the likelihood of any payments being required there under is remote.
In October 2011, the three limited partnerships that own the Ohio Properties admitted two entities that are affiliates of BC Partners as new limited partners as part of a syndication of LIHTCs on the Ohio Properties. The BC Partners have agreed to contribute approximately $6.7 million to the equity of these limited partnerships, subject to the Ohio Properties meeting certain debt service coverage ratios specified in the applicable limited partnership agreements. As of December 31, 2011, the Ohio Properties had not yet achieved these debt service coverage ratios and the BC Partners had not contributed a sufficient amount of additional capital to these limited partnerships to allow the Company to deconsolidate the Ohio Properties. Accordingly, the Company continues to report each Ohio Property as an MF Property, and no gain from the 2010 sale of such Ohio Property will be recognized by the Company, until the Ohio Property achieves specified debt service coverage ratios and the BC Partners have contributed their additional capital to the limited partnership owning the Ohio Property. The Company expects that each of the Ohio Properties will achieve the debt service coverage ratios so that the BC Partners will fully fund their capital commitments during 2012. As that occurs, each Ohio Property will cease to be reported as an MF Property and the Company will recognize the gain for the 2010 sale of the Ohio Property. After that time, the Company will report the tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds on such Ohio Property as an asset and will report the related interest income on the bond.
In connection with the BC Partners transaction, the Company entered into guarantee agreements with the BC Partners under which the Company has guaranteed certain obligations of the general partner of these limited partnerships, including an obligation to repurchase the interests of the BC Partners if certain “repurchase events” occur. A repurchase event is defined as any one of a number of events mainly focused on the completion of the property rehabilitation, property rent stabilization, the delivery of LIHTCs, tax credit recapture and foreclosure. Even if a repurchase event should occur, 25% of the BC equity would remain in the Ohio Properties and thus BC, a third party, would have sufficient equity in the Ohio Properties for the Company to recognize the sale discussed above. No amount has been accrued for this contingent liability because the likelihood of a repurchase event is remote.
14. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11, which contains new disclosure requirements regarding the nature of an entity's rights of offset and related arrangements associated with its financial instruments and derivative instruments. The new disclosure requirements are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and the interim periods therein; retrospective application is required.
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-10, which addresses whether the guidance on real estate sales applies to derecognition events involving subsidiaries that are in-substance real estate. For public entities, the ASU's amendments are effective prospectively for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning on or after June 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is still in the process of assessing the expected impact of ASU 2011-10 when adopted.
15. Fair Value Measurements
Current accounting guidance on fair value measurements establishes a framework for measuring fair value and provides for expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. The guidance:
| |
• | Defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date; and |
| |
• | Establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. |
Inputs refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, the fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The three levels of the hierarchy are defined as follows:
| |
• | Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
| |
• | Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. |
| |
• | Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for asset or liabilities. |
The categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value.
Investments in Tax-exempt Mortgage Revenue Bonds. The fair values of the Company’s investments in tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds have each been based on a discounted cash flow and yield to maturity analysis. There is no active trading market for the bonds and price quotes for the bonds are not available. If available, the General Partner may also consider price quotes on similar bonds or other information from external sources, such as pricing services. The estimates of the fair values of these bonds, whether estimated by the Company or based on external sources, are based largely on unobservable inputs the General Partner believes would be used by market participants. Additionally, the calculation methodology used by the external sources and the Company encompasses the use of judgment in its application. To validate changes in the fair value of the Company's investments in tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds between reporting periods, management looks at the key inputs such as changes in the current market yields on similar bonds as well as changes in the operating performance of the underlying property serving as collateral for each bond. We validate that the changes in the estimated fair value of the tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds move with the changes in these monitored factors. Given these facts the fair value measurement of the Company’s investment in tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds is categorized as a Level 3 input.
Interest rate derivatives. The effect of the Company’s interest rate caps is to set a cap, or upper limit, on the base rate of interest paid on the Company’s variable rate debt equal to the notional amount of the derivative agreement. The effect of the Company’s interest rate swap is to change a variable rate debt obligation to a fixed rate for that portion of the debt equal to the notional amount of the derivative agreement. The interest rate derivatives are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value included in current period earnings within interest expense. The fair value of the interest rate derivatives is based on a model whose inputs are not observable and therefore are categorized as a Level 3 input.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2012 |
Description | | Assets/Liabilities at Fair Value | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Tax-exempt Mortgage Revenue Bonds | | $ | 138,576,178 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 138,576,178 |
|
Interest Rate Derivatives | | 993,930 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 993,930 |
|
Total Assets at Fair Value | | $ | 139,570,108 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 139,570,108 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | For Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 |
| | | | Fair Value Measurements Using Significant |
| | | | Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
| | | | Tax-exempt Mortgage Revenue Bonds | | Interest Rate Derivatives | | Total |
Beginning Balance January 1, 2012 | | | | $ | 135,695,352 |
| | $ | 1,323,270 |
| | $ | 137,018,622 |
|
Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized) | | | | | | | | |
Included in earnings | | | | — |
| | (329,340 | ) | | (329,340 | ) |
Included in other comprehensive income | | | | 2,841,588 |
| | — |
| | 2,841,588 |
|
Settlements | | | | 39,238 |
| | — |
| | 39,238 |
|
Ending Balance March 31, 2012 | | | | $ | 138,576,178 |
| | $ | 993,930 |
| | $ | 139,570,108 |
|
Total amount of losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets or liabilities still held as of March 31, 2012 | | $ | — |
| | $ | (329,340 | ) | | $ | (329,340 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 |
Description | | Assets/Liabilities at Fair Value | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Tax-exempt Mortgage Revenue Bonds | | $ | 135,695,352 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 135,695,352 |
|
Interest Rate Derivatives | | 1,323,270 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,323,270 |
|
Total Assets at Fair Value | | $ | 137,018,622 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 137,018,622 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | For Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 |
| | | | Fair Value Measurements Using Significant |
| | | | Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
| | | | Tax-exempt Mortgage Revenue Bonds | | Interest Rate Derivatives | | Total |
Beginning Balance January 1, 2011 | | | | $ | 100,566,643 |
| | $ | 3,406,791 |
| | $ | 103,973,434 |
|
Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized) | | | | | | | | |
Included in earnings | | | | — |
| | (232,554) |
| | (232,554) |
|
Included in other comprehensive income | | | | 2,849,040 |
| | — |
| | 2,849,040 |
|
Purchases | | | | 4,492,500 |
| | — |
| | 4,492,500 |
|
Settlements | | | | 19,381 |
| | — |
| | 19,381 |
|
Ending Balance March 31, 2011 | | | | $ | 107,927,564 |
| | $ | 3,174,237 |
| | $ | 111,101,801 |
|
Total amount of losses for the period included in earning attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets or liabilities still held as of March 31, 2011 | | $ | — |
| | $ | (232,554 | ) | | $ | (232,554 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Losses included in earnings for the period shown above are included in interest expense.
The Company calculates a fair market value of each financial instrument using a discounted cash flow model based on the debt amortization schedules at the effective rate of interest for each period represented. This estimate of fair value is based on Level 3 inputs. Below represents the fair market value of the debt held on the balance sheet for March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 |
| Carrying Amount | | Fair Value | | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value |
|
Financial Liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Debt financing | 112,537,000 |
| | 113,665,484 |
| | 112,673,000 |
| | 115,106,332 |
|
Mortgages payable | 41,752,135 |
| | 42,502,138 |
| | 46,243,883 |
| | 46,932,670 |
|
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
In this Management’s Discussion and Analysis, the “Partnership” refers to America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P. and its Consolidated Subsidiaries which consist of:
| |
• | ATAX TEBS I, LLC, a special purpose entity owned and controlled by the Partnership, created to facilitate the Tax Exempt Bond Securitization (“TEBS”) Financing with Freddie Mac - (see Note 8). |
| |
• | Nine multifamily apartments ("MF Properties") owned by various Partnership subsidiaries. Such subsidiaries hold a 99% limited partner interest in five limited partnerships and 100% member positions in four limited liability companies. Three apartment properties which are subject to a sales agreement and are also reported as MF Properties (the “MF Properties”) (see Note 5). |
| |
• | One of the five limited partnerships is being held as a discontinued operation in both periods. (see Note 7) |
The “Company” refers to the condensed consolidated financial statements reported in this Form 10-Q which include the assets, liabilities and results of operations of the Partnership, its Consolidated Subsidiaries and three other consolidated entities in which the Partnership does not hold an ownership interest but which own multifamily apartment properties financed with tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds held by the Partnership and which are treated as variable interest entities ("VIEs") of which the Partnership has been determined to be the primary beneficiary (“Consolidated VIEs”). All significant transactions and accounts between the Partnership and the VIEs have been eliminated in consolidation.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company’s critical accounting policies are the same as those described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Executive Summary
For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company generated net income of approximately $630,000 and $1.4 million, respectively. The reasons for the decrease when comparing the first three months of 2012 to the first three months of 2011 is due to the recording of a $238,000 loss on interest receivable for the Woodland Park interest accrued for the first three months of 2012 and an increase in interest expense due to larger costs of borrowing and greater outstanding debt. The remaining difference was mainly related to the increase in depreciation and amortization expense from the first quarter of 2011 to the first quarter of 2012 related to the Arboretum property (acquired on March 31, 2011) and the Eagle Village property which was acquired in June 2011. Overall economic occupancy (which is adjusted to reflect rental concessions, delinquent rents and non-revenue units such as model units and employee units) of the apartment properties that the Partnership has financed with tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds was approximately 86% for first three months of 2012 and approximately 83% for the first three months of 2011. Overall economic occupancy of the MF Properties was approximately 84% for first three months of 2012 compared to approximately 83% during the first three months of 2011. The Company generated Cash Available for Distribution (“CAD”) of approximately $2.7 million and $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. See further discussion of CAD in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis on page 44.
Recent Investment Activity
On March 1, 2012, a brokerage contract was executed to list the Churchland property for sale. As a result, this MF Property met the criteria for discontinued operations presentation and has been classified as such in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented (see Note 7). The proceeds from the sale of the Churchland property are expected to be greater than the carrying value of its assets.
The Partnership purchased land adjacent to DeCordova for approximately $153,000 in 2011 and began constructing 34 units on this land in 2012. These will be market rate units once they are completed which should occur in the fall of 2012.
Recent Financing Activity
In February 2012, the Partnership obtained a $2.0 million construction loan secured by the DeCordova property to be used to expand the DeCordova campus by constructing a new apartment building adjacent to the existing DeCordova property. This construction loan is with an unrelated third party and carries a fixed annual interest rate of 5.0%, maturing on February 1, 2017.
Discussion of the Partnership Bond Holdings and the Related Apartment Properties as of March 31, 2012
The Partnership’s purpose is to acquire and hold as long-term investments a portfolio of federally tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds which have been issued to provide construction and/or permanent financing of multifamily residential apartments. At March 31, 2012, the Partnership held 20 tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds secured by 20 properties of which 13 bonds are owned by ATAX TEBS I, LLC and two are held in trust facilities with Deutsche Bank (see Note 8). The 20 properties securing the bonds contain a total of 3,959 rental units. Three of the entities that own the apartment properties financed by three of the Partnership’s tax exempt mortgage revenue bonds were deemed to be Consolidated VIEs of the Partnership at March 31, 2012 and, as a result, these bonds are eliminated in consolidation on the Company’s financial statements. Additionally, two bonds secured by the Ohio Properties subject to a sales agreement will continue to be eliminated in consolidation on the Company’s financial statements until these properties meet the criteria for recognition of their sale as discussed in Note 2.
At March 31, 2011, the Partnership held 20 tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds secured by 20 properties of which 13 bonds are owned by ATAX TEBS I, LLC. The 20 properties securing the bonds contain a total of 3,606 rental units. Four of the entities that own the apartment properties financed by four of the Partnership’s tax exempt mortgage revenue bonds were deemed to be Consolidated VIEs of the Partnership at March 31, 2011 and, as a result, these bonds are eliminated in consolidation on the Company’s financial statements. Additionally, two bonds secured by the Ohio Properties subject to a sales agreement were eliminated in consolidation on the Company’s financial statements.
To facilitate its investment strategy of acquiring additional tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds secured by multifamily apartment properties, the Partnership may acquire ownership positions in MF Properties in order to ultimately restructure the property ownership through a sale of the MF Properties. The Partnership expects each of these MF Properties to eventually be sold to a not-for-profit entity or in connection with a syndication of Low Income Housing Tax Credits ("LIHTCs"). The Partnership expects to acquire tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds issued to provide debt financing for these properties at the time the property ownership is restructured. The Partnership expects to provide the tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds to the new property owners as part of the restructuring. Such restructurings will generally be expected to be initiated within 36 months of the Partnership’s investment in an MF Property and will often coincide with the expiration of the compliance period relating to LIHTCs previously issued with respect to the MF Property.
At March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Partnership’s wholly-owned subsidiaries held interests in five entities that own MF Properties containing a total of 602 rental units. In addition, the three Ohio Properties contain 362 rental units which continue to be reported as an MF Property as they are subject to a sales agreement (see Note 2). 124 rental units included in the total 602 rental units, are being held as discontinued operations. As of March 31, 2012, the Partnership's subsidiaries also own 100% of four MF Properties, Arboretum, DeCordova, Eagle Village and Weatherford containing a total of 808 rental units As of March 31, 2011, the Partnership's subsidiaries owned 100% of three MF Properties, Arboretum, DeCordova and Weatherford. Arboretum and DeCordova containing a total of 221 rental units.
America First Properties Management Company (“Properties Management”), an affiliate of AFCA 2, provides property management services for Ashley Square, Iona Lakes Apartments, Bent Tree Apartments, Lake Forest Apartments, Fairmont Oaks Apartments, Cross Creek, Woodland Park and each of the MF Properties. Management believes that this relationship provides greater insight and understanding of the underlying property operations and their ability to meet debt service requirements to the Partnership.
The following table outlines certain information regarding the apartment properties on which the Partnership holds tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds (separately identifying those owned by entities treated as Consolidated VIEs) and the MF Properties. The narrative discussion that follows provides a brief operating analysis of each property during the first three months of 2012 and 2011.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Number of Units | | Number of Units Occupied | | Percentage of Occupied Units as of March 31, | | Economic Occupancy (1) for the period ended March 31, |
| | | | | | |
Property Name | | Location | | | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-Consolidated Properties | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ashley Square Apartments | | Des Moines, IA | | 144 |
| | 137 |
| | 95 | % | | 98 | % | | 97 | % | | 96 | % |
Autumn Pines | | Humble, TX | | 250 |
| | 235 |
| | 94 | % | | 93 | % | | 90 | % | | 91 | % |
Bella Vista Apartments | | Gainesville, TX | | 144 |
| | 133 |
| | 92 | % | | 94 | % | | 89 | % | | 84 | % |
Bridle Ridge Apartments | | Greer, SC | | 152 |
| | 150 |
| | 99 | % | | 94 | % | | 94 | % | | 85 | % |
Brookstone Apartments | | Waukegan, IL | | 168 |
| | 159 |
| | 95 | % | | 95 | % | | 90 | % | | 88 | % |
Cross Creek Apartments | | Beaufort, SC | | 144 |
| | 120 |
| | 83 | % | | 93 | % | | 78 | % | | 86 | % |
GMF-Madison Tower Apartments (3) | | Memphis, TN | | 147 |
| | 134 |
| | 91 | % | | n/a |
| | 92 | % | | n/a |
|
GMF-Warren/Tulane Apartments (3) | | Memphis, TN | | 448 |
| | 436 |
| | 97 | % | | n/a |
| | 93 | % | | n/a |
|
Iona Lakes Apartments | | Ft. Myers, FL | | 350 |
| | 304 |
| | 87 | % | | 93 | % | | 69 | % | | 72 | % |
Runnymede Apartments | | Austin, TX | | 252 |
| | 239 |
| | 95 | % | | 88 | % | | 90 | % | | 84 | % |
South Park Ranch Apartments | | Austin, TX | | 192 |
| | 189 |
| | 98 | % | | 94 | % | | 95 | % | | 90 | % |
Villages at Lost Creek | | San Antonio, TX | | 261 |
| | 254 |
| | 97 | % | | 95 | % | | 88 | % | | 89 | % |
Woodland Park (4) | | Topeka, KS | | 236 |
| | 205 |
| | 87 | % | | 84 | % | | 84 | % | | 75 | % |
Woodlynn Village | | Maplewood, MN | | 59 |
| | 58 |
| | 98 | % | | 93 | % | | 99 | % | | 94 | % |
| | | | 2,947 |
| | 2,753 |
| | 93 | % | | 93 | % | | 87 | % | | 84 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated VIEs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Bent Tree Apartments | | Columbia, SC | | 232 |
| | 224 |
| | 97 | % | | 90 | % | | 84 | % | | 78 | % |
Fairmont Oaks Apartments | | Gainesville, FL | | 178 |
| | 161 |
| | 90 | % | | 90 | % | | 79 | % | | 75 | % |
Lake Forest Apartments | | Daytona Beach, FL | | 240 |
| | 205 |
| | 85 | % | | 95 | % | | 75 | % | | 79 | % |
| | | | 650 |
| | 590 |
| | 91 | % | | 92 | % | | 79 | % | | 77 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MF Properties | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Arboretum (3) | | Omaha, NE | | 145 |
| | 103 |
| | 71 | % | | n/a |
| | 75 | % | | n/a |
|
Crescent Village (5) | | Cincinnati, OH | | 90 |
| | 89 |
| | 99 | % | | 79 | % | | 92 | % | | 79 | % |
Eagle Ridge | | Erlanger, KY | | 64 |
| | 60 |
| | 94 | % | | 91 | % | | 86 | % | | 81 | % |
Eagle Village (3) | | Evansville, IN | | 511 |
| | 349 |
| | 68 | % | | n/a |
| | 78 | % | | n/a |
|
Glynn Place | | Brunswick, GA | | 128 |
| | 95 |
| | 74 | % | | 77 | % | | 64 | % | | 73 | % |
Greens of Pine Glen | | Durham, NC | | 168 |
| | 166 |
| | 99 | % | | 94 | % | | 90 | % | | 86 | % |
Meadowview | | Highland Heights, KY | | 118 |
| | 112 |
| | 95 | % | | 90 | % | | 94 | % | | 89 | % |
Postwoods (5) | | Reynoldsburg, OH | | 180 |
| | 171 |
| | 95 | % | | 88 | % | | 97 | % | | 84 | % |
Residences at DeCordova (4) | | Granbury, TX | | 76 |
| | 72 |
| | 95 | % | | 92 | % | | 86 | % | | 79 | % |
Residences at Weatherford (2) | | Weatherford, TX | | 76 |
| | n/a |
| | n/a |
| | n/a |
| | n/a |
| | n/a |
|
Willow Bend (5) | | Columbus (Hilliard), OH | | 92 |
| | 84 |
| | 91 | % | | 87 | % | | 87 | % | | 87 | % |
| | | | 1,648 |
| | 1,301 |
| | 80 | % | | 78 | % | | 84 | % | | 83 | % |
| |
(1) | Economic occupancy is presented for the first three months of 2012 and 2011, and is defined as the net rental income received divided by the maximum amount of rental income to be derived from each property. This statistic is reflective of rental concessions, delinquent rents and non-revenue units such as model units and employee units. Actual occupancy is a point in time measure while economic occupancy is a measurement over the period presented, therefore, economic occupancy for a period may exceed the actual occupancy at any point in time. |
| |
(2) | This property was under construction during the first quarter of 2012; and therefore, has no occupancy data. |
| |
(3) | Previous period occupancy numbers are not available, as this is a new investment. |
| |
(4) | Construction on these properties has been completed and the properties are in a lease up and stabilization period. |
| |
(5) | The Partnership holds $18.3 million of tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds secured by these properties and does not hold an ownership interest in these properties. The Company will continue to report these properties as MF Properties, and eliminate the tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds in consolidation, until the properties meet the criteria for sale recognition discussed in Note 2. |
Non-Consolidated Properties
Ashley Square – Ashley Square Apartments is located in Des Moines, Iowa. In the first quarter of 2012, Net Operating Income (calculated as property revenue less salaries, advertising, administration, utilities, repair and maintenance, insurance, taxes, and management fee expenses) was $170,000 as compared to $179,000 in 2011. This decrease was the result of an increase in salary and advertising expenses. Debt service on the Partnership’s bonds on this property was current as of March 31, 2012.
Autumn Pines – Autumn Pines is located in Humble, Texas. These bonds were purchased in November 2010. In the first quarter of 2012, Autumn Pines’ operations resulted in Net Operating Income of $311,000 as compared to $305,000 in 2011. This increase was the direct result of a decrease in administrative and repair and maintenance expenses. Debt service on the Partnership’s bonds on this property was current as of March 31, 2012.
Bella Vista – Bella Vista Apartments is located in Gainesville, Texas. In the first quarter of 2012, Bella Vista’s operations resulted in Net Operating Income of $150,000 as compared to $120,000 in 2011. This increase was a result of an increase in economic occupancy along with a decrease in utility expenses. Debt service on the Partnership’s bonds on this property was current as of March 31, 2012.
Bridle Ridge Apartments – Bridle Ridge Apartments is located in Greer, South Carolina. In the first quarter of 2012, Bridle Ridge Apartments’ operations resulted in Net Operating Income of $177,000 as compared to $182,000 in 2011. This decrease was a result of an increase in administrative expenses offset slightly by the increase in economic occupancy. Debt service on the Partnership’s bonds on this property was current as of March 31, 2012.
Brookstone – Brookstone Apartments is located in Waukegan, Illinois. In the first quarter of 2012, Brookstone’s operations resulted in Net Operating Income of $218,000 as compared to $213,000 in 2011. This increase was a result of an increase in economic occupancy. Debt service on the Partnership’s bonds on this property was current as of March 31, 2012.
Cross Creek – Cross Creek Apartments is located in Beaufort, South Carolina. In the first quarter of 2012, Cross Creek’s operations resulted in Net Operating Income of $92,000 as compared to $106,000 in 2011. This decrease was a result of a decrease in economic occupancy along with an increase in administrative expenses. Debt service on the Partnership’s bonds on this property was current as of March 31, 2012.
GMF-Madison Tower – Madison Tower is located in Memphis, Tennessee and is a 147 unit facility. The Partnership purchased this newly issued bond in June 2011 at par value. In the first quarter of 2012, Madison Tower's operations resulted in Net Operating Income of $66,000 on net revenue of approximately $236,000. Debt service on the Partnership's bonds on this property was current as of March 31, 2012.
GMF-Warren/Tulane – Warren/Tulane is located in Memphis, Tennessee and is a 448 unit facility. The Partnership purchased this newly issued bond in June 2011 at par value. In the first quarter of 2012, Warren/Tulane's operations resulted in Net Operating Income of $321,000 on net revenue of approximately $716,000. Debt service on the Partnership's bonds on this property was current as of March 31, 2012.
Iona Lakes – Iona Lakes Apartments is located in Fort Myers, Florida. In the first quarter of 2012, Net Operating Income was $302,000 as compared to $327,000 in 2011. This decrease was the result of a decrease in economic occupancy and an increase in salary expense. Debt service on the Partnership’s bonds on this property was current as of March 31, 2012.
Runnymede Apartments – Runnymede Apartments is located in Austin, Texas. In the first quarter 2012, Runnymede Apartment’s operations resulted in Net Operating Income of approximately $258,000 as compared to approximately $211,000 in 2011. This increase was the result of an increase in economic occupancy along with a decrease in leasing and repair and maintenance expenses. Debt service on the Partnership’s bonds on this property was current as of March 31, 2012.
South Park Ranch Apartments – South Park Ranch Apartments is located in Austin, Texas. In the first quarter of 2012, Net Operating Income was $303,000 as compared to $295,000 in 2011. This increase was the direct result of an increase in economic occupancy. Debt service on the Partnership’s bonds on this property was current as of March 31, 2012.
Villages at Lost Creek – Villages at Lost Creek is located in San Antonio, Texas. In the first quarter of 2012, Net Operating Income was $407,000 as compared to $377,000 in 2011. This increase was the result of a decrease in utility expenses and a decrease in property and liability insurance offset by a decrease in economic occupancy. Debt service on the Partnership’s bond on this property was current as of March 31, 2012.
Woodland Park – Woodland Park is located in Topeka, Kansas and was completed in November 2008, but remains in its initial lease-up phase and has not yet reached stabilization which is defined in the bond documents as the generation of a 1.15:1 debt service coverage ratio for six straight months. Additionally, there were insufficient funds on deposit with the bond trustee to make the debt service payment of approximately $452,000 on the bonds which was due on May 3, 2010, and the property owner did not provide additional capital to fund the shortfall. As a result, a payment default on the bonds has occurred. In order to protect its investment, the Partnership has issued a formal notice of default through the bond trustee and has started the foreclosure process. The foreclosure process has been extended and the Partnership cannot estimate when it will be completed. The Partnership continues to enforce its rights as the first lien position. The Partnership believes it will be successful in removing and replacing the general and limited partners of the property owner through foreclosure. This action would allow a new property owner to re-syndicate the LIHTCs associated with this property. If these LIHTCs can be successfully re-syndicated, it will provide additional capital to the project which can be used to support debt service payments on the tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds until property operations improve to the point that sufficient cash is generated to pay any past due amounts on the bonds as well as ongoing debt service. If the re-syndication of LIHTCs is not successful, the Partnership may pursue other options including making additional taxable loans to the property or completing the foreclosure process and taking direct ownership of the property. The Partnership is taking all available cash flows from the property in accordance with the property's obligation under the bond indenture which has been less than the required interest payments due to the Partnership.
As of March 31, 2012, occupancy had decreased to 205 units, or 87% physical occupancy, with an additional one lease pending. Based on the level of leasing activity resulting from the change in the mix of affordable and market rate tenants, the Partnership continues to believe that Woodland is capable of reaching stabilization. In the first quarter of 2012, Net Operating Income was approximately $126,000 on net revenue of approximately $404,000. The Company periodically tests for impairment of all fixed assets, bond investments, and taxable loans made to various properties and other amounts due to the Company. Such evaluation is based on cash flow and discounted cash flow models. The December 31, 2011 evaluation determined that a portion of the interest receivable on the Woodland Park bond was impaired and that an allowance for loss and associated provision for loss of approximately $953,000 was recorded against the accrued bond interest in 2011. The Partnership has recorded an additional reserve of approximately $238,000 against the interest receivable on the Woodland Park bonds in the first quarter of 2012.
Woodlynn Village – Woodlynn Village is located in Maplewood, Minnesota. In the first quarter of 2012, Net Operating Income was $103,000 as compared to $86,000 in 2011. This increase was the result of an increase in economic occupancy along with a decrease in salary expenses. Debt service on the Partnership’s bonds on this property was current as of March 31, 2012.
Consolidated VIEs
Bent Tree – Bent Tree Apartments is located in Columbia, South Carolina. In the first quarter of 2012, Net Operating Income was $175,000 as compared to $142,000 in 2011. This increase was the result of an increase in economic occupancy along with a decrease in repair and maintenance and utility expenses. Debt service on the Partnership’s bonds on this property was current of March 31, 2012.
Fairmont Oaks – Fairmont Oaks Apartments is located in Gainesville, Florida. In the first quarter of 2012, Net Operating Income was $175,000 as compared to $157,000 in 2011. This increase was the result of an increase in economic occupancy along with a decrease in repair expenses. Debt service on the Partnership’s bonds on this property was current as of March 31, 2012.
Lake Forest – Lake Forest Apartments is located in Daytona Beach, Florida. In the first quarter of 2012, Net Operating Income was $170,000 as compared to $215,000 in 2011. This decrease was a direct result of a decrease in economic occupancy and an increase in salary expense. Debt service on the Partnership’s bonds on this property was current as of March 31, 2012.
MF Properties
Arboretum – Arboretum is located in Omaha, Nebraska and is a 145 unit independent senior living facility. This property was purchased on March 31, 2011. In the first quarter of 2012, Arboretum's operations resulted in Net Operating Income of $350,000 on net revenue of approximately $655,000.
Eagle Ridge – Eagle Ridge Townhomes is located in Erlanger, Kentucky. In the first quarter of 2012, Net Operating Income was $66,000 as compared to $49,000 in 2011. This increase was the result of an increase in economic occupancy along with a decrease in repair and maintenance expenses and advertising expenses.
Eagle Village –Eagle Village is located in Evansville, Indiana and is a 511 bed student housing facility. This property was purchased on June 29, 2011. In the first quarter of 2012, Eagle Village's operations resulted in Net Operating Income of $249,000 on net revenue of approximately $509,000.
Glynn Place – Glynn Place Apartments is located in Brunswick, Georgia. In the first quarter of 2012, Net Operating Income was $57,000 as compared to $96,000 in 2011. This decrease was the result of a decrease in economic occupancy along with an increase in salary expenses.
Greens of Pine Glen – Greens of Pine Glen Apartments is located in Durham, North Carolina. In the first quarter of 2012, Net Operating Income was $168,000 as compared to $155,000 in 2011. This increase is a result of an increase in economic occupancy along with a decrease in utility expense.
Meadowview – Meadowview Apartments is located in Highland Heights, Kentucky. In the first quarter of 2012, Net Operating Income was $176,000 as compared to $168,000 in 2011. This increase was a result of an increase in economic occupancy offset by an increase to salary expense.
Residences at DeCordova – This property is a senior (55+) affordable housing project located in Granbury, Texas in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. In the first quarter of 2012, Net Operating Income was $88,000 as compared to $120,000 in the first quarter of 2011. This decrease is a result of an increase in economic occupancy offset by an increase in real estate taxes.
Residences at Weatherford – Residences at Weatherford are currently under construction and will contain 76 units upon completion. This property is a senior (55+) affordable housing project located in Weatherford, Texas in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. In February 2011, the Partnership foreclosed with Weatherford becoming a consolidated MF Property. The construction of this property was approximately 99% complete on March 31, 2012. The expected completion date is April, 2012. As of March 31, 2012, two apartments have been leased. Further, the Partnership expects to operate the property as a market rate property and will evaluate its options in order to recoup its investment after the property has been leased up.
The following three properties are subject to a sales agreement; however, due to insufficient contributed capital by the new owners, the sale does not qualify for recognition of the gain or deconsolidation of the properties until such time that the contributed capital is sufficient. As a result the Company continues to consolidate these Ohio Properties as if they were owned. See Note 2 for further information.
Crescent Village – Crescent Village Townhomes is located in Cincinnati, Ohio. In the first quarter of 2012, Net Operating Income was $109,000 as compared to $87,000 in 2011. This increase was the result of an increase in economic occupancy along with a decrease in utility expenses. Debt service on the Partnership’s bonds on this property was current as of March 31, 2012.
Postwoods – Postwoods Townhomes is located in Reynoldsburg, Ohio. In the first quarter of 2012, Net Operating Income was $187,000 as compared to $175,000 in 2011. This increase was a result of an increase in economic occupancy along with a decrease in utility expenses. Debt service on the Partnership’s bonds on this property was current as of March 31, 2012.
Willow Bend – Willow Bend Townhomes is located in Columbus (Hilliard), Ohio. In the first quarter of 2012, Net Operating Income was $85,000 as compared to $89,000 in 2011. This decrease was a result of an increase in real estate taxes and salary expense. Debt service on the Partnership’s bonds on this property was current as of March 31, 2012.
Discontinued Operations
Commons at Churchland – Commons at Churchland is located in Chesapeake, Virginia. On March 1, 2012, the Company executed a brokerage contract to list this property for sale and met the criteria to classify it as held for sale. In the first quarter of 2012, Net Operating Income was $170,000 as compared to $159,000 in 2011. This increase was the result of increased economic occupancy partially offset by an increase in salary and repair and maintenance expenses.
Results of Operations
Consolidated Results of Operations
The following discussion of the Company’s results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Item 1 of this report as well as the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 (Consolidated)
Change in Results of Operations
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 | | For Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 | | Dollar Change |
Revenues: | | | | | | |
Property revenues | | $ | 4,238,929 |
| | $ | 3,565,553 |
| | $ | 673,376 |
|
Mortgage revenue bond investment income | | 2,371,404 |
| | 2,220,913 |
| | 150,491 |
|
Other income | | 39,345 |
| | 251,361 |
| | (212,016 | ) |
Total revenue | | 6,649,678 |
| | 6,037,827 |
| | 611,851 |
|
| | | | | | |
Expenses: | | | | | | |
Real estate operating (exclusive of items shown below) | | 2,279,934 |
| | 2,132,208 |
| | 147,726 |
|
Provision for loss on receivables | | 238,175 |
| | — |
| | 238,175 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | | 1,438,905 |
| | 1,133,059 |
| | 305,846 |
|
Interest | | 1,318,535 |
| | 773,734 |
| | 544,801 |
|
General and administrative | | 650,579 |
| | 641,595 |
| | 8,984 |
|
Total expenses | | 5,926,128 |
| | 4,680,596 |
| | 1,245,532 |
|
Income from continuing operations | | 723,550 |
| | 1,357,231 |
| | (633,681 | ) |
Income from discontinued operations | | 46,034 |
| | 14,004 |
| | 32,030 |
|
Net income | | 769,584 |
| | 1,371,235 |
| | (601,651 | ) |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest | | 139,152 |
| | 182,061 |
| | (42,909 | ) |
Net income - America First Tax Exempt Investors, L. P. | | $ | 630,432 |
| | $ | 1,189,174 |
| | $ | (558,742 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Property revenues. Property revenues increased approximately $1.2 million as a result of the addition of Eagle Village and Arboretum which was acquired after the first quarter 2011. Offsetting this increase was an approximate $679,000 reduction in revenue due to the deconsolidation of Iona Lakes (which occurred in June 2011). The MF Properties averaged monthly rent of approximately $621 per unit in 2012 as compared with $590 per unit in 2011. Economic occupancy at the MF Properties was 84% during the first quarter of 2012 as compared to 83% in the first quarter of 2011. The Consolidated VIEs averaged $588 per unit in monthly rent in 2012 as compared to $571 per unit in 2011. Economic occupancy of the Consolidated VIEs was 79% in 2012 and 77% in 2011.
Mortgage revenue bond investment income. Mortgage revenue bond investment income increased during the first quarter of 2012 as compared to the first quarter of 2011 due to the additional tax-exempt interest payments of approximately $264,000 from the acquisitions of GMF Madison Tower and GMF Warren/Tulane bonds late in 2011 and approximately $271,000 due to the deconsolidation of Iona Lakes in second quarter 2011. These increases were offset by reductions of approximately $366,000 attributable to the Weatherford and DeCordova foreclosures in February 2011 and the redemptions of Briarwood Manor Apartments and Clarkson College bonds in the second half of 2011.
Other income. Other income decreased from first quarter 2011 to the first quarter of 2012 because the taxable loans interest income and the forgiveness of third party debt related to the DeCordova foreclosure was not replicated in 2012.
Real estate operating expenses. Real estate operating expenses associated with the MF Properties and the Consolidated VIEs is comprised principally of real estate taxes, property insurance, utilities, property management fees, repairs and maintenance, and salaries and related employee expenses of on-site employees. A portion of real estate operating expenses are fixed in nature, thus a decrease in physical and economic occupancy would result in a reduction in operating margins. Conversely, as physical and economic occupancy increase, the fixed nature of these expenses will increase operating margins as these real estate operating expenses would not increase at the same rate as rental revenues. The overall increase in real estate operating expenses was due to approximately $298,000 of expenses related to the Arboretum and Eagle Village properties which were not included in the first quarter 2011. In addition, DeCordova reported approximately $107,000 of expenses as an MF Property for two months of 2011 and for the entire first quarter of 2012. These expenses were offset by an approximately $375,000 reduction in operating expenses due to the deconsolidation of Iona Lakes in 2011. The remaining increase was related to the existing MF Properties and the Consolidated VIEs reporting increases in salaries, decreased utilities and a slight increase in repair and maintenance.
Provision for loss on receivables. During the second quarter of 2011, an impairment of the interest receivable on the Woodland Park bond occurred and an allowance for loss has been recorded since that time. During the first quarter 2012, approximately $238,000 was recorded against the accrued bond interest receivable.
Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation results primarily from the apartment properties of the Consolidated VIEs and the MF Properties. Amortization consists of in-place lease intangible assets recorded as part of the purchase accounting for the acquisition of MF Properties and deferred finance cost amortization related to the closing of the TEBS Credit Facility. Approximately $304,000 of the increase in depreciation and amortization expense from the first quarter of 2011 to the first quarter of 2012 is related to the Arboretum property (acquired on March 31, 2011) and the Eagle Village property acquired in June 2011. Offsetting this increase is the approximate $193,000 decrease in depreciation and amortization expense due to the deconsolidation of Iona Lakes in second quarter 2011. Additional depreciation expense was reported on newly capitalized assets of existing MF Properties and Consolidated VIEs.
Interest expense. The increase in interest expense during the first quarter of 2012 as compared to the first quarter of 2011 was due to a number of factors. The Company's borrowing cost increased to approximately 2.6% per annum in 2012 from approximately 2.2% in the first quarter of 2011 resulting in an approximate increase of $271,000 when comparing first quarter of 2012 to first quarter of 2011. An additional increase of approximately $106,000 resulted from the higher average principal of outstanding debt. The remaining increase was the result of the mark to market adjustment of the Company's derivatives. These interest rate derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting and, accordingly, they are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value included in current period earnings within interest expense.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased due mainly to increased administration fees paid to AFCA2 as a result of new investments and increased professional fees when comparing the first quarter of 2011 and the first quarter of 2012.
Partnership Only Results of Operations
The following discussion of the Partnership’s results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 reflects the operations of the Partnership without the consolidation of any VIEs during either period under the GAAP consolidation rules then in effect. This information is used by management to analyze the Partnership’s operations and is reflective of the consolidated operations of the Tax-Exempt Bond Investments segment and the MF Properties segment as presented Note 12 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 (Partnership Only)
Changes in Results of Operations
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 | | For Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 | | Dollar Change |
Revenues: | | | | | | |
Property revenues | | $ | 3,044,020 |
| | $ | 1,679,315 |
| | $ | 1,364,705 |
|
Mortgage revenue bond investment income | | 2,753,077 |
| | 2,904,674 |
| | (151,597 | ) |
Other income | | 39,345 |
| | 146,373 |
| | (107,028 | ) |
Total revenues | | 5,836,442 |
| | 4,730,362 |
| | 1,106,080 |
|
Expenses: | | | | | | |
Real estate operating (exclusive of items shown below) | | 1,571,893 |
| | 1,076,084 |
| | 495,809 |
|
Provision for loss on receivables | | 238,175 |
| | — |
| | 238,175 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | | 1,093,851 |
| | 601,589 |
| | 492,262 |
|
Interest | | 1,318,535 |
| | 773,734 |
| | 544,801 |
|
General and administrative | | 650,579 |
| | 641,595 |
| | 8,984 |
|
Total expenses | | 4,873,033 |
| | 3,093,002 |
| | 1,780,031 |
|
Income from continuing operations | | 963,409 |
| | 1,637,360 |
| | (673,951 | ) |
Income from discontinued operations | | 46,034 |
| | 14,004 |
| | 32,030 |
|
Net income | | 1,009,443 |
| | 1,651,364 |
| | (641,921 | ) |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest | | 139,152 |
| | 182,061 |
| | (42,909 | ) |
Net income - America First Tax Exempt Investors, L. P. | | $ | 870,291 |
| | $ | 1,469,303 |
| | $ | (599,012 | ) |
Property revenues. Of the $1.4 million increase in property revenues, approximately $1.2 million was a result of the addition of Eagle Village and Arboretum which were acquired after the first quarter of 2011. The remaining increase related to increases in economic occupancy from first quarter 2011 to first quarter 2012. The MF Properties averaged approximately $621 per unit in monthly rent in 2012 as compared with $590 per unit in 2011. Economic occupancy at the MF Properties was 84% during the first quarter of 2012 as compared to 83% in the first quarter of 2011.
Mortgage revenue bond investment income. Mortgage revenue bond investment income decreased during the first quarter of 2012 compared to the first quarter of 2011 by approximately $366,000 due to the Weatherford and DeCordova foreclosures and the redemptions of Briarwood Manor Apartments and Clarkson College bonds in 2011. These decreases were offset by increases due to the additional tax-exempt interest payments of approximately $264,000 from the acquisitions of GMF Madison Tower and GMF Warren/Tulane bonds late in 2011.
Other income. Other income decreased from first quarter 2011 to the first quarter of 2012 because the taxable loans interest income and the forgiveness of third party debt related to the DeCordova foreclosure was not replicated in 2012.
Real estate operating expenses. Real estate operating expenses associated with the MF Properties is comprised principally of real estate taxes, property insurance, utilities, property management fees, repairs and maintenance, and salaries and related employee expenses of on-site employees. A portion of real estate operating expenses are fixed in nature, thus a decrease in physical and economic occupancy would result in a reduction in operating margins. Conversely, as physical and economic occupancy increase, the fixed nature of a portion of these expenses will increase operating margins as these real estate operating expenses would not increase at the same rate as rental revenues. The overall increase in real estate operating expenses was due to the approximate $298,000 of expenses related to the Arboretum and Eagle Village properties which were not included in first quarter 2011. In addition, DeCordova reported approximately $107,000 as an MF Property for two months of 2011 and for the entire first quarter of 2012. The remaining increase was related to the existing MF Properties reporting increases in salaries, decreases in utilities and a slight increase in repair and maintenance.
Provision for loss on receivables. During the second quarter of 2011, an impairment of the interest receivable on the Woodland Park bond occurred and an allowance for loss has been recorded since that time. During the first quarter 2012, approximately $238,000 was recorded against the accrued bond interest receivable.
Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation results primarily from the apartment properties of the the MF Properties. Amortization consists of in-place lease intangible assets recorded as part of the purchase accounting for the acquisition of MF Properties and deferred finance cost amortization related to the closing of the TEBS Credit Facility. Approximately $304,000 of the increase in depreciation and amortization expense from the first quarter of 2011 to the first quarter of 2012 is related to the purchase of Arboretum and Eagle Village properties on or after March 31, 2011. In addition, more depreciation expense was reported attributable to depreciation on newly capitalized assets of existing MF Properties and Consolidated VIEs.
Interest expense. The increase in interest expense during the first quarter of 2012 compared to the first quarter of 2011 was due to a number of factors. The Company's borrowing cost increased to approximately 2.6% per annum in 2012 from approximately 2.2% in the first quarter of 2011 resulting in an approximate increase of $271,000 when comparing first quarter of 2012 to the first quarter of 2011. An additional increase of approximately $106,000 resulted from the higher average principal of outstanding debt. The remaining increase was the result of the mark to market adjustment of the Company's derivatives. These interest rate derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting and, accordingly, they are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value included in current period earnings within interest expense.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased due mainly to increased administration fees paid to AFCA2 as a result of new investments and increased professional fees when comparing the first quarter of 2011 and the first quarter of 2012.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Tax-exempt interest earned on the tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds, including those financing properties held by Consolidated VIEs and the Ohio properties, represents the Partnership's principal source of cash flow. The Partnership may also receive interest payments on its taxable mortgage loans, earnings on temporary investments and cash distributions from equity interests held in MF Properties. Tax-exempt interest is primarily comprised of base interest payments received on the Partnership’s tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds. Certain of the tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds may also generate payments of contingent interest to the Partnership from time to time when the underlying apartment properties generate excess cash flow. Because base interest on each of the Partnership’s mortgage revenue bonds is fixed, the Partnership’s cash receipts tend to be fairly constant period to period unless the Partnership acquires or disposes of its investments in tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds. Changes in the economic performance of the properties financed by tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds with a contingent interest provision will affect the amount of contingent interest, if any, paid to the Partnership. Similarly, the economic performance of MF Properties will affect the amount of cash distributions, if any, received by the Partnership from its ownership of these properties. The economic performance of a multifamily apartment property depends on the rental and occupancy rates of the property and on the level of operating expenses. Occupancy rates and rents are directly affected by the supply of, and demand for, apartments in the market area in which a property is located. This, in turn, is affected by several factors such as local or national economic conditions, the amount of new apartment construction and the affordability of single-family homes. In addition, factors such as government regulation (such as zoning laws), inflation, real estate and other taxes, labor problems and natural disasters can affect the economic operations of an apartment property. The primary uses of cash by apartment properties are the payment of operating expenses and debt service.
Other sources of cash available to the Partnership include debt financing, mortgages, and the sale of additional Beneficial Unit Certificates ("BUCs"). The Company currently has outstanding debt financing of $112.5 million under separate credit facilities.
In July 2011, the Company closed a $10.0 million financing utilizing a Tender Option Bond ("TOB") structure with the Deutsche Bank ("DB"). The first TOB was structured as a securitization of the Company's $13.4 million Autumn Pines Apartments tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond. In December 2011, the Company closed a second TOB financing structure in the amount of $7.8 million with DB. The second TOB was structured as a securitization of the Company's $15.6 million GMF-Warren/Tulane Apartments and GMF-Madison apartments tax-exempt mortgage revenue and taxable mortgage revenue bonds. Under the TOB structure, the Company transferred the bonds to a custodian and trustee that provide these services on behalf of DB. The TOB trustee then issued senior floating-rate participation interests ("SPEARS"), and residual participation interests, ("LIFERS"). The SPEARS and LIFERS represent beneficial interests in the securitized asset held by the TOB trustee. The SPEARS were credit-enhanced by DB and sold through a placement agent to unaffiliated investors. The gross proceeds from the sale of the SPEARS were remitted to the Company. The LIFERS were retained by the Company and are pledged to DB to secure certain reimbursement obligations.
As a result, the TOB trusts provide the Company with a secured variable rate debt facility at interest rates that reflect the prevailing short-term tax-exempt rates paid by the TOB trusts on the SPEARS. Payments made to the holders of the SPEARS and the amount of trust fees represent the Company's effective cost of borrowing on the net proceeds it received from the sale of the SPEARS. The total fixed trust fees are 1.77% and 2.10% per annum, respectively, and as of March 31, 2012 the rates paid on the TOBs on the SPEARS were 0.28% and 0.26% respectively, resulting in a total cost of borrowing of 2.05% and 2.36%. The Company is accounting for these transactions as secured financing arrangements and the outstanding amount is $17.7 million at March 31, 2012.
As of September 1, 2010 and in connection with the TEBS Financing, the Partnership and its Consolidated Subsidiary ATAX TEBS I, LLC, entered into a number of agreements relating to a new long-term debt financing facility provided through the securitization of 13 tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds owned by the ATAX TEBS I, LLC (the “Sponsor”) . The TEBS Financing essentially provides the Partnership with a long-term variable-rate debt facility at interest rates reflecting prevailing short-term tax-exempt rates.
Effective September 1, 2010, the Partnership transferred bonds to ATAX TEBS I, LLC, a special purpose entity controlled by the Partnership pursuant to the TEBS Financing (see Note 8). The par value of the bonds included in this financing facility as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is $124.5 million and $124.6 million. The total Facility Fees are 1.9%, and, as of March 31, 2012, the SIFMA rate was equal to 0.24% resulting in a total cost of borrowing of 2.14% on the outstanding balance on the TEBS Financing facility of $94.8 million.
In addition to the debt facilities, the Company has six outstanding mortgage loans collaterized by five MF Properties. The total outstanding mortgage loan principal is approximately $41.8 million. These mortgages carry current interest rates ranging from 2.8% to 5.9% with maturity dates ranging from May 2012 to July 2015. An extension request to the mortgage which comes due in May 2012, as allowed in the loan documents, has been formally submitted and we expect to obtain formal extension approval before the end of May.
The Partnership is authorized to issue additional BUCs to raise additional equity capital to fund investment opportunities. In April 2010, a Registration Statement on Form S-3 was declared effective by SEC under which the Partnership may offer up to $200.0 million of additional BUCs from time to time. In April 2010, the Partnership issued an additional 8,280,000 BUCs through an underwritten public offering at a public offering price of $5.37 per BUC pursuant to this new Registration Statement. Net proceeds realized by the Partnership from this issuance of these BUCs were approximately $41.7 million after payment of an underwriter's discount and other offering costs of approximately $2.8 million.
The Partnership’s principal uses of cash are the payment of distributions to unitholders, interest and principal on debt financing, and general and administrative expenses. The Partnership also uses cash to acquire additional investments. Distributions to unitholders may increase or decrease at the determination of the General Partner. The per unit cash available for distributionprimarily depends on the amount of interest and other cash received by the Partnership from its portfolio of tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds and other investments, the amount of the Partnership's outstanding debt and the effective interest rates paid by the Partnership on this debt, the level of operating and other cash expenses incurred by the Partnership and the number of units outstanding. During the quarter ended March 31, 2012, the Partnership generated cash available for distribution of $0.09 per unit. See “Cash Available for Distribution,” on a following page. As a result, the Partnership was required to supplement its cash available for distribution during the first quarter of 2012 with unrestricted cash and expects to continue to do so until the Partnership is able to complete its current investment and financing plans. The General Partner believes that upon completion of its current investment and financing plans, the Partnership will be able meet its liquidity requirements, including the payment of expenses, interest on its debt financing, and cash distributions to unitholders at the current level of $0.50 per unit per year without the use of unrestricted cash. However, if actual results vary from current projections and the actual CAD generated is less than the new regular distribution, such distribution amount may need to be reduced.
The Partnership's operating policy is to use securitizations or other forms of leverage to maintain a level of debt financing between 40% and 60% of the total par value of the Partnership's tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond portfolio. At March 31, 2012, the Partnership had outstanding debt financing of approximately $112.5 million secured by 16 tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds. The total par value of the Partnership's tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds is $153.4 million. When the par value of the two tax exempt mortgage revenue bonds secured by the Ohio properties which are not reported as tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds in the Partnership balance sheet plus approximately $7.3 million in restricted cash are included, the total amount leveraged is approximately $195.7 million. Dividing that amount by the $112.5 million of debt financing results in a leverage ratio of approximately 57% at March 31, 2012. Additionally, the MF Properties are encumbered by mortgage loans with an aggregate principal balance of approximately $41.8 million. The total debt financing plus mortgage loans as of March 31, 2012 of approximately $154.3 million results in a leverage ratio to Total Assets of approximately 52%.
The Consolidated VIEs’ and MF Properties' primary source of cash is net rental revenues generated by their real estate investments. Net rental revenues from a multifamily apartment property depend on the rental and occupancy rates of the property and on the level of operating expenses. Occupancy rates and rents are directly affected by the supply of, and demand for, apartments in the market area in which a property is located. This, in turn, is affected by several factors such as local or national economic conditions, the amount of new apartment construction and the affordability of single-family homes. In addition, factors such as government regulation (such as zoning laws), inflation, real estate and other taxes, labor problems and natural disasters can affect the economic operations of an apartment property.
The Consolidated VIEs’ and MF Properties' primary uses of cash are the payment of operating expenses and the payment of debt service.
On a consolidated basis, there was an improvement of approximately $902,000 in cash provided by operating activities for the first quarter of 2012 as compared to first quarter of 2011 due to changes in working capital components. Cash used for investing activities decreased approximately $22.6 million for first quarter of 2012 as compared to first quarter of 2011 due to investing activities which were not replicated in the 2012. The main use of cash in the first quarter of 2011 was the result of acquiring the Arboretum Apartments and the Briarwood Manor bond offset by the release of restricted cash upon foreclosure of the DeCordova and Weatherford properties. The Company had cash used for financing activities of approximately $2.7 million for the first quarter of 2012 compared to cash provided by financing activities of $23.7 million for first quarter of 2011. Financing cash flows in the first quarter of 2011 included $20.8 million of borrowings used to acquire interest in MF Properties which was not replicated in the first quarter of 2012.
Economic Conditions
The disruptions in domestic and international financial markets, and the resulting restrictions on the availability of debt financing that had prevailed since 2008 began to subside in 2010 and continued to recover in 2011 and 2012. While economic trends show signs of a stabilization of the economy and debt availability has increased, overall availability remains limited and the cost of credit may continue to be adversely impacted. These conditions, in our view, will continue to create potential investment opportunities for the Partnership. Many participants in the multifamily housing debt sector either reduced their participation in the market or were forced to liquidate some or all of their existing portfolio investments in order to meet their liquidity needs. We believe this continues to create opportunities to acquire existing tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds from distressed holders at attractive yields. The Partnership continues to evaluate potential investments in bonds which are available on the secondary market. We believe many of these bonds will meet our investment criteria and that we have a unique ability to analyze and close on these opportunities while maintaining our ability and willingness to also participate in primary market transactions.
Current credit and real estate market conditions also create opportunities to acquire quality MF Properties from distressed owners and lenders. Our ability to restructure existing debt together with the ability to improve the operations of the apartment properties through our affiliated property management company can position these MF Properties for an eventual financing with tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds meeting our investment criteria and that will be supported by a valuable and well-run apartment property. We believe we can selectively acquire MF Properties, restructure debt and improve operations in order to create value to our unitholders in the form of a strong tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond investment.
On the other hand, continued economic weakness in some markets may limit our ability to access additional debt financing that the Partnership uses to partially finance its investment portfolio or otherwise meet its liquidity requirements. In addition, the economic conditions including a slow job growth and low home mortgage interest rates have had a negative effect on some of the apartment properties which collateralize our tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond investments and our MF Properties in the form of lower occupancy. While some properties have been negatively affected, overall economic occupancy (which is adjusted to reflect rental concessions, delinquent rents and non-revenue units such as model units and employee units) of the apartment properties that the Partnership has financed with tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds was approximately 86% for first three months of 2012 and approximately 83% for the first three months of 2011. Overall economic occupancy of the MF Properties was approximately 84% for first three months of 2012 compared to approximately 83% during the first three months of 2011.
Cash Available for Distribution
Management utilizes a calculation of Cash Available for Distribution (“CAD”) as a means to determine the Partnership’s ability to make distributions to unitholders. The general partner believes that CAD provides relevant information about its operations and is necessary along with net income for understanding its operating results. To calculate CAD, amortization expense related to debt financing costs and bond reissuance costs, Tier 2 income due to the general partner as defined in the Agreement of Limited Partnership, interest rate derivative expense or income, provision for loan losses, impairments on bonds, and losses related to VIEs including depreciation expense are added back to the Company’s net income (loss) as computed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). There is no generally accepted methodology for computing CAD, and the Company’s computation of CAD may not be comparable to CAD reported by other companies. Although the Company considers CAD to be a useful measure of its operating performance, CAD should not be considered as an alternative to net income or net cash flows from operating activities which are calculated in accordance with GAAP.
During June 2010, the Company completed a sales transaction whereby four of the MF Properties, the Ohio Properties, were sold to three new ownership entities controlled by an unaffiliated not-for-profit entity (see Note 2). The properties will continue to be presented as MF Properties and no gain will be recognized until such time as the transaction can be accounted for as a sale. As the deferred gain on the transaction represents cash paid to the Company and no on-going legal obligations related to the Ohio Properties or potential obligation to repay any amounts exists, the deferred gain is CAD and is shown as an adjustment in the CAD Calculation below. This gain meets the definition of Net Residual Proceeds representing contingent interest (Tier 2 income) and was therefore distributed 75% to the unitholders and 25% to the General Partner.
Distributions
The Partnership continued distributions during the quarter at an annual rate of $0.50 per BUC. Since realized CAD per unit was less than $0.50 per unit, the Partnership has used unrestricted cash to supplement the deficit. The General Partner believes that upon completion of its current investment and financing plans, the Partnership will be able to generate sufficient CAD to maintain cash distributions to unitholders at the current level of $0.50 per unit per year without the use of other available cash. However, there is no assurance that the Partnership will be able to generate CAD at levels in excess of the current annual distribution rate. In that case, the annual distribution rate per unit may need to be reduced.
The following tables show the calculation of CAD for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 | | For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 |
Net income - America First Tax Exempt Investors L.P. | | $ | 630,432 |
| | $ | 1,189,174 |
|
Net loss related to VIEs and eliminations due to consolidation | | 239,859 |
| | 280,129 |
|
Net income before impact of VIE consolidation | | $ | 870,291 |
| | $ | 1,469,303 |
|
Change in fair value of derivatives and interest rate derivative amortization | | 329,340 |
| | 232,554 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense (Partnership only) | | 852,002 |
| | 524,563 |
|
Provision for loss on receivables | | 238,175 |
| | — |
|
Depreciation and amortization related to discontinued operations | | 72,410 |
| | — |
|
Bond purchase discount accretion (net of cash received) | | (75,906 | ) | | (108,956 | ) |
Ohio deferred interest | | 346,405 |
| | 347,514 |
|
CAD | | $ | 2,632,717 |
| | $ | 2,464,978 |
|
Weighted average number of units outstanding, | | | | |
basic and diluted | | 30,122,928 |
| | 30,122,928 |
|
Net income, basic and diluted, per unit | | $ | 0.03 |
| | $ | 0.05 |
|
Total CAD per unit | | $ | 0.09 |
| | $ | 0.08 |
|
Distributions per unit | | $ | 0.125 |
| | $ | 0.125 |
|
Contractual Obligations
As discussed in the Annual report on Form 10-K, the amounts maturing in 2012 consist of the paydowns on the TEBS credit facility with Freddie Mac and payments on the MF Property mortgages.
The Company has the following contractual obligations as of March 31, 2012:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Payments due by period |
| | | Less than | | 1-2 | | More than 2 |
| Total | | 1 year | | years | | years |
Debt financing | $ | 112,537,000 |
| | $ | 18,695,000 |
| | $ | 2,113,000 |
| | $ | 91,729,000 |
|
Mortgages payable | $ | 41,752,135 |
| | $ | 4,294,560 |
| | $ | 31,053,000 |
| | $ | 6,404,575 |
|
Effective interest rate(s) (1) | | | 2.91 | % | | 2.11 | % | | 2.05 | % |
Interest (2) | $ | 14,944,678 |
| | $ | 4,119,736 |
| | $ | 5,680,132 |
| | $ | 5,144,810 |
|
| |
(1) | Interest rates shown are the average effective rates as of March 31, 2012 and include the impact of our interest rate derivatives. |
| |
(2) | Interest shown is estimated based upon current effective interest rates through maturity. |
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11, which contains new disclosure requirements regarding the nature of an entity's rights of offset and related arrangements associated with its financial instruments and derivative instruments. The new disclosure requirements are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and the interim periods therein; retrospective application is required.
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-10, which addresses whether the guidance on real estate sales applies to derecognition events involving subsidiaries that are in-substance real estate. For public entities, the ASU's amendments are effective prospectively for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning on or after June 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is still in the process of assessing the expected impact of ASU 2011-10 when adopted.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
There have been no material changes in market risk, except as discussed below, from the information provided under “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” in Item 7A of the Company’s 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In order to mitigate its exposure to interest rate fluctuations on the variable rate TEBS Financing, the Partnership entered into interest rate cap agreements with Barclays Bank PLC, Bank of New York Mellon and Royal Bank of Canada, each in an initial notional amount of approximately $31.9 million which effectively limits the interest payable by the Company on the TEBS Financing to a fixed rate of 3.0% per annum on the combined notional amounts of the interest rate cap agreements through August 2017. The interest rate cap plus the Facility Fees result in a maximum potential cost of borrowing on the TEBS Financing of 4.9% per annum.
The following table outlines the interest rate caps the Company has in place as of March 31, 2012:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Effective | | Maturity | | Purchase | | |
Date Purchased | | Notional Amount | | Capped Rate | | Date | | Price | | Counterparty |
| | | | | | | | | | |
September 2, 2010 | | 31,936,667 |
| | 3 | % | | September 1, 2017 | | 921,000 |
| | Bank of New York Mellon |
| | | | | | | | | | |
September 2, 2010 | | 31,936,667 |
| | 3 | % | | September 1, 2017 | | 845,600 |
| | Barclays Bank PLC |
| | | | | | | | | | |
September 2, 2010 | | 31,936,667 |
| | 3 | % | | September 1, 2017 | | 928,000 |
| | Royal Bank of Canada |
These interest rate derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting and, accordingly, they are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value included in current period earnings within interest expense. The change in the fair value of these derivative contracts resulted in an increase in interest expense of approximately $329,000 and $233,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. The Partnership's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Partnership's current disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting. The Partnership’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have determined that there were no changes in the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
The risk factors affecting the Company are described in Item 1A “Risk Factors” of the Company’s 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 6. Exhibits.
The following exhibits are filed as required by Item 6 of this report. Exhibit numbers refer to the paragraph numbers under Item 601 of Regulation S-K:
3. Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of America First Fiduciary Corporation Number Five (incorporated herein by reference to Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 2-99997) filed by America First Tax Exempt Mortgage Fund Limited Partnership on August 30, 1985).
4(a) Form of Certificate of Beneficial Unit Certificate (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-50513) filed by the Company on April 17, 1998).
4(b) Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Partnership (incorporated herein by reference to the Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K (No. 000-24843) filed by the Company on June 28, 1999).
4(c) Amended Agreement of Merger, dated June 12, 1998, between the Partnership and America First Tax Exempt Mortgage Fund Limited Partnership (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-50513) filed by the Company on September 14, 1998).
31.1 Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101 The following materials from the Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 are furnished herewith, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Partners' Capital for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, (v) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, and (vi) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
AMERICA FIRST TAX EXEMPT INVESTORS, L.P.
|
| | |
Date: May 9, 2012 | By: | /s/ Mark Hiatt |
| | Mark Hiatt |
| | Chief Executive Officer |
|
| | |
Date: May 9, 2012 | By: | /s/ Timothy Francis |
| | Timothy Francis |
| | Chief Financial Officer |